On Friday, 5. February 2010. 21.02.37 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On February 5, 2010, Lukas Appelhans wrote:
> > I think we should have a working group (only for a few hours maybe) about
> > how we manage application menus... (especially interesting for Ivan,
> > ruphy, Nuno et moi)
>
> sounds good;
>
> the big requirements we have in plasma is the ability to have a named
> "context" that can be associated with locations, people, documents ...
>
> context+location will likely end up being a pretty important pairing to at
> least some of our users since if i'm doing work related activities,
On February 5, 2010 09:44:14 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On February 4, 2010, Chani wrote:
> > We seem to have two or three definitions of the word "activity" in
> > kdebase now. Oops.
>
> we have precisely one definition.
*you* have precisely one definition, in your head. not so in mine. :) and I
g
Am Freitag 05 Februar 2010 21:02:37 schrieb Aaron J. Seigo:
> On February 5, 2010, Lukas Appelhans wrote:
> > I think we should have a working group (only for a few hours maybe) about
> > how we manage application menus... (especially interesting for Ivan,
> > ruphy, Nuno et moi)
>
> sounds good;
> > So while in theory it makes sense to be able to merge vdesktops with
> >
> > activities, in reality it'd end up feeling awkward and hacky. :(
>
> And not really possible. For example, one might want to have more virtual
> desktops in one activity (when I say 'one' in this case I mean 'at le
On February 5, 2010, Lukas Appelhans wrote:
> I think we should have a working group (only for a few hours maybe) about
> how we manage application menus... (especially interesting for Ivan,
> ruphy, Nuno et moi)
sounds good; let's call it a half-day session? can you add it to the wiki with
you a
On February 5, 2010, Marco Martin wrote:
> On Friday 05 February 2010, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > hi all ...
> >
> > we need to collect a listing of all the breakout groups for Tokamak IV.
> > you
> >
> > can see a start to this on the Tokamak IV organization page here:
> > http://techbase.kde
Hey!
I think we should have a working group (only for a few hours maybe) about how
we manage application menus... (especially interesting for Ivan, ruphy, Nuno
et moi)
We may want to integrate it with Nepomuk, get some thoughts about sharing as
most code as possible and get some enlightenment
On Friday 05 February 2010, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> hi all ...
>
> we need to collect a listing of all the breakout groups for Tokamak IV. you
> can see a start to this on the Tokamak IV organization page here:
>
> http://techbase.kde.org/Projects/Plasma/Tokamak4#Breakout_Groups
>
> to add
hi all ...
we need to collect a listing of all the breakout groups for Tokamak IV. you
can see a start to this on the Tokamak IV organization page here:
http://techbase.kde.org/Projects/Plasma/Tokamak4#Breakout_Groups
to add a new group, please propose it here in this thread and if we a
On February 5, 2010, Sandro Andrade wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Has the arrangement for working groups in T4 already begun ? Or is this
we need to start this. i'll begin a new thread for it.
--
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43
K
Hi all,
Has the arrangement for working groups in T4 already begun ? Or is this
going to be defined in the beginning of sprint ? I'm trying the make a plan
for my contribution during T4 ...
See you,
Sandro
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 11:06 PM, Lukas Appelhans wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 03 Februar 2010 23
On February 4, 2010, Chani wrote:
> We seem to have two or three definitions of the word "activity" in kdebase
> now. Oops.
we have precisely one definition.
> First, there's the original: desktop containments.
> Second, there's the nepomuk activities: they're UIDs that can have an
> associated n
Hi Aaron,
Yes, this is definitely exciting...contests are fun to promote :) I read
through all the info below and don't really have much in the way of feedback
as this looks very well thought out already. I did notice one typo, but
that's about it:
* Each contestant may submit one, and only one
On February 5, 2010, Diego Moya wrote:
> The current problem with VDs and activities is, they are conflicting
> spatial metaphors. They both are using the plane surface in two
> different inconsistent ways. If I'm working with a set of windows and
> go to the right (either with the "rotating cube"
On February 5, 2010, Marco Martin wrote:
> what i see as the "real" one is the nepomuk one, the plasma ones i see more
> as "placeholders" or "visual representations" of activities
> (i would even tempted to ditch that at all and make widgets in the same
> containment behave differently when the ac
On February 5, 2010, Yuen Hoe Lim wrote:
> Anyway, so if I read the conversation right, we have decided to a) release
> alpha1 on the 10th as planned and b) "keep" themes for now? :)
correct.
> Just fixed this btw:
>
> I tried creating a new project "Hello" and changed it to "Hello1" in the
>
Short reply:
Move activities to the third dimension - they should be a
generalization of the plasma dashboard to N layers. Open windows
should adapt to the current selected layer (dashboard = all windows
autohide; other layers = show new background + show attached plasmoids
+ change Nepomuk-enable
> the backtrace wasn't very specific, but i may have fixed it anyways. can
> you
> svn up libplasma and repeat to see if it works better now?
>
>
Agh! I'm still persuading the latest pykde to build :( The crash is trivial
to reproduce though, so if someone has the latest builds at hand maybe you
co
On Friday 05 February 2010, 06:43 Marco Martin wrote:
> what i see as the "real" one is the nepomuk one, the plasma ones i see more
> as "placeholders" or "visual representations" of activities
+1
> in the end the more clear name it could have i think is just "widget set"
+1 again hehe. though i
On Thursday 04 February 2010, 22:06 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> below is a first draft of the text i'm working on for the announcement of a
> javascript plasmoid competition. supporting artwork is underway and some
> details (some prize specifics, judges, etc) are still being filled in.
> feedback is w
On Friday 05 February 2010, Chani wrote:
> hey guys :) this is a bit of a pre-emptive email... ramblurr was saying
> he'd email some questions, and yagami was having ideas in #kwin, and
> there's some possible confusion I'd like to address, so... well, here I
> am.
>
> We seem to have two or three
> We seem to have two or three definitions of the word "activity" in kdebase
> now. Oops.
> First, there's the original: desktop containments.
> Second, there's the nepomuk activities: they're UIDs that can have an
> associated name, and then other arbitrary things can be associated with
> them. T
23 matches
Mail list logo
