On Saturday 02 May 2009 19:32:28 David Nolden wrote:
> Am Sonntag 03 Mai 2009 00:20:13 schrieb Martin Gräßlin:
> > I very much doubt that any Linux distribution including KDE 4.3 will not
> > provide at least XRender compositing with any hardware. If you own such a
> > hardware you should report a
FWIW, I don't have composite on (waiting for gallium drivers to save me) and I
still regularly find myself thinking "damn, KDE really does look awesome these
days".
--
This message brought to you by eevil bananas and the number 3.
www.chani3.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
Am Sonntag 03 Mai 2009 00:20:13 schrieb Martin Gräßlin:
> I very much doubt that any Linux distribution including KDE 4.3 will not
> provide at least XRender compositing with *any* hardware. If you own such a
> hardware you should report a bug report to X developers requesting support.
Intel GMA 95
On Sunday 03 May 2009 01:08:31 David Nolden wrote:
> Am Samstag 02 Mai 2009 17:37:00 schrieb Marco Martin:
> > > Composition is simply not an option. And for some users, it never will.
> >
> > if it never will, linux desktop has simply blatantly failed, because it
> > means it reached the maximum i
Am Samstag 02 Mai 2009 17:37:00 schrieb Marco Martin:
> > Composition is simply not an option. And for some users, it never will.
>
> if it never will, linux desktop has simply blatantly failed, because it
> means it reached the maximum it can do nd no further evolution is possible,
> so in the nex
On Saturday 02 May 2009 18:17:56 Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
> On Saturday 02 May 2009 17:48:13 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > On Friday 01 May 2009 18:40:00 Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
> > > These are the main issues I encountered. Please try the systray from
> > > trunk some time and give your feedback on the
Hey, this is a mail to get/put an update on Plasmate. As I remember, we had
distributed the work among 4 people including me, but unfortunately I forgot
all of your nicks. So, please reply to this mail with them, and yes, I've
started looking into the editor part, noticed a Text Editor is already
i
>
> > we're supposed to have some kind of logging facility, right? ideally I'd
> > expect that notifications that stopped doing anything more than 5 minutes
> > ago would get sent away somewhere so that I'd have to explicitly click
> > some sort of "history" button or something to show them. I migh
Some of you may or may not remember that I've also been working on
interruptions and notifications; however as part of a uni project rather than
for an open source project.
Part of the project is for designing an empirical experiment to explore
different features in notifications. I would like
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/649/
---
(Updated 2009-05-02 11:19:15.254137)
Review request for Plasma and Aaron Seigo.
On Saturday 02 May 2009 17:48:13 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> On Friday 01 May 2009 18:40:00 Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
> > These are the main issues I encountered. Please try the systray from
> > trunk some time and give your feedback on these issues or provide your
> > own points.
>
> I've been seeing a
On Friday 01 May 2009 19:06:09 David Nolden wrote:
> When a theme designer makes a theme transparent, then he wants something to
> show through the theme.
Air actually does this. No fake translucency though.
I concur with Aaron and Zack on the other points. Fix (or help fixing) the
offending dri
On Friday 01 May 2009 18:40:00 Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
> These are the main issues I encountered. Please try the systray from trunk
> some time and give your feedback on these issues or provide your own
> points.
I've been seeing a logic issue for some time, I'll use this poke to finally
tell you
On Saturday 02 May 2009, David Nolden wrote:
> >On Friday 01 May 2009, David Nolden wrote:
> >> This already looks quite nice. But since many plasma themes have a
> >> glassy look, they highly profit from something more shining through
> >> them, since that's the only way they can retain that look.
On Friday 01 May 2009, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Friday 01 May 2009, Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
> > * Auto hiding after the dialog with jobs and notifications get's
> > automatically shown because one get's added. Currently this is hardcoded
> > to 6 seconds, but there are quite some requests for havi
On Saturday 02 May 2009, Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
> On Friday 01 May 2009 20:39:43 Marco Martin wrote:
> > On Friday 01 May 2009, Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
> > > * Auto hiding after the dialog with jobs and notifications get's
> > > automatically shown because one get's added. Currently this is
> > > ha
On Friday 01 May 2009 21:53:04 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Friday 01 May 2009, Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
> > * Auto hiding after the dialog with jobs and notifications get's
> > automatically shown because one get's added. Currently this is hardcoded
> > to 6 seconds, but there are quite some requests
On Friday 01 May 2009 20:39:43 Marco Martin wrote:
> On Friday 01 May 2009, Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
> > * Auto hiding after the dialog with jobs and notifications get's
> > automatically shown because one get's added. Currently this is hardcoded
> > to 6 seconds, but there are quite some requests fo
On Friday 01 May 2009 20:37:48 Chani wrote:
> hrrm. you say some prefer no-autohide, then suggest a way to configure the
> autohide *time*. can we just offer an autohide checkbox and hardcode the
> time to something reasonable? (6 seconds seems ok so far)
Probably better yes.
> > * I don't like h
19 matches
Mail list logo
