On Tuesday 24 February 2009 19:50:32 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> hi all ..
>
> some users seem disturbed that plasma "looks different". while i think they
> are rather completely missing the point (which is "yes, the shell is meant
> to look different") it did get me thinking about things ...
>
> when
On Freitag 27 Februar 2009 12:47:12 Artur Souza(MoRpHeUz) wrote:
> On Friday 27 February 2009 08:32:31 Matthias Fuchs wrote:
> > I tried QSizePolicy::Preferred, updateGeometry() on the layout,
> > invalidate and adjustSize on both the labels and the layout. Maybe the
> > order in which I called the
On Thursday 26 February 2009, Artur de Souza (MoRpHeUz) wrote:
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/195/#review287
> ---
>
>
On Friday 27 February 2009 08:32:31 Matthias Fuchs wrote:
> I tried QSizePolicy::Preferred, updateGeometry() on the layout, invalidate
> and adjustSize on both the labels and the layout. Maybe the order in which
> I called these methods was wrong or maybe I'm doing something stupid, it
> did not wo
Hello,
I'm having problems with QGraphicsLayout.
In my case I have a QGraphicsLinearLayout filled with a Plasma::Label, a
Strech and another Plasma::Label.
Often the Label-Text is changed after that I recreate the Layout -- as the
Labels might or might not be shown.
The problem I have is that i
On Friday 27 February 2009, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> Richard has transscribed the results from the system tray session at
> TokamakII to techbase, and I've added some things to it to make it more
> clear. It lacks quite a bit of 'real meat' still, which is why we all
> should have a good look at i
On Thursday 26 February 2009, Chani wrote:
> > are you using FrameSvg or a qsvgrenderer? with framesvg the opaque
> > version should be automatically picked when compositing is disabled, but
> > test it with oxygen for now, because air is still not complete and
> > doesn't have the opaque version o
