Re: setPassivePopup(true) for Battery applet?

2009-01-02 Thread Jamboarder
> From: Aaron J. Seigo > On Wednesday 31 December 2008, Jamboarder wrote: > > Would there be any objection to using > setPassivePopup(true) for the battery > > applet. > > yes, and for the same reason that making kicker a passive > popup would be > inane: they aren't items that you open and then

Re: sorry... too hard

2009-01-02 Thread Loïc Marteau
2009/1/2 Aaron J. Seigo : > On Tuesday 30 December 2008, Loïc Marteau wrote: >> Why not make some virtual packages in some tiers repos for some distro >> (suse, fedora, kubuntu etc), who depends on all the dev-libraries >> packages a dev will eventually need to build all the kde trunk ? >> >> With

Re: setPassivePopup(true) for Battery applet?

2009-01-02 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Wednesday 31 December 2008, Jamboarder wrote: > Would there be any objection to using setPassivePopup(true) for the battery > applet. yes, and for the same reason that making kicker a passive popup would be inane: they aren't items that you open and then do other work with them still open for

Re: sorry... too hard

2009-01-02 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Tuesday 30 December 2008, Loïc Marteau wrote: > Why not make some virtual packages in some tiers repos for some distro > (suse, fedora, kubuntu etc), who depends on all the dev-libraries > packages a dev will eventually need to build all the kde trunk ? > > With this virtual package could come s