plasma apps and screen information

2008-10-19 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
hi.. in a few places in libplasma we still assume that we're dealing with physical screens. this probably isn't correct, because of the whole "we're not making a desktop" thing. ;) something that occurred to me is that we could probably change the convention from talking about "screens" to som

Re: Review Request: Improved extender theming

2008-10-19 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Sunday 19 October 2008, Rob Scheepmaker wrote: > On Saturday 18 October 2008 22:40:31 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > + ? ? ? ?enum Appearance { > > > > is there any use for an AllBorders? > > Maybe... In what situation would you want to use that? that's what i was asking you ;) it does make it "comp

Re: Review Request: big visual drop target when dropping applets on panel

2008-10-19 Thread Aaron Seigo
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard.vidsolbach.de/r/227/#review224 --- should this be in plasma/shells/desktop/panelview.cpp? because the

Re: Review Request: Improved extender theming

2008-10-19 Thread Rob Scheepmaker
On Saturday 18 October 2008 22:40:31 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > that could possibly be because the minimumSize being set is larger than the > maximumSize? > > (yes, it should probably bump up the max size in that case, but iirc it > doesn't) It doesn't look like that's the case, but thanks for the su

Re: 4.2 feature targets

2008-10-19 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Sunday 19 October 2008, Aike J Sommer wrote: > What about the planned feature list? yes, it really should have been on there already to make the freeze. we're lucky in that it was only an oversight that we didn't add it there. > Under which category?? kdebase, i guess. -- Aaron J. Seigo hu

Re: 4.2: the binary compatible release

2008-10-19 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Sunday 19 October 2008, Kevin Ottens wrote: > Le Saturday 18 October 2008, Aaron J. Seigo a écrit : > > * Known issues > > * Service additions > > Hm, last time I looked at it, it was ok. Did it got much changes I > overlooked lately? no, but i'll be adding hooks to "remote" a Service o

Re: 4.2 feature targets

2008-10-19 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Sunday 19 October 2008, Guillaume Pothier wrote: > Just a quick note: parts of plasmalibs currently use QDesktopWidget > for screen management and should be ported to Kephal if the rest of > plasma uses Kephal i think there are some places that we use QDesktopWidget there that aren't probably

Re: Review Request: Improved extender theming

2008-10-19 Thread Rob Scheepmaker
On Sunday 19 October 2008 13:38:24 Marco Martin wrote: > On Saturday 18 October 2008, Nuno Pinheiro wrote: > > > Diff: http://reviewboard.vidsolbach.de/r/222/diff > > > > > > > > > Testing > > > --- > > > > > > Done some testing om kuiserver and clock. > > > > > > > > > Screenshots > > > --

Review Request: maximize button in panel controller

2008-10-19 Thread Marco Martin
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard.vidsolbach.de/r/228/ --- Review request for Plasma. Summary --- trying this after hearing some

Re: 4.2 feature targets

2008-10-19 Thread Aike J Sommer
Am Sonntag 19 Oktober 2008 19:38:14 schrieb Aaron J. Seigo: > On Sunday 19 October 2008, Aike J Sommer wrote: > > So... Should we put it in 4.2?? If so, what do i need to do?? > > i'd like to see it in, yes. but this is more than just plasma. so: > > * move it into kdereview > * email kde-core-deve

Review Request: big visual drop target when dropping applets on panel

2008-10-19 Thread Marco Martin
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard.vidsolbach.de/r/227/ --- Review request for Plasma. Summary --- when dropping an applet from th

Re: 4.2: the binary compatible release

2008-10-19 Thread Kevin Ottens
Le Saturday 18 October 2008, Aaron J. Seigo a écrit : > the second thing we discussed at the meeting today was moving libplasma to > kdelibs and guaranteeing binary compatibility starting with 4.2. > > here are our notes from the meeting: > > Binary Compatibility and kdelibs > * The Plan >

Re: 4.2: the binary compatible release

2008-10-19 Thread Kevin Ottens
Le Sunday 19 October 2008, Sebastian Kügler a écrit : > SvgFrame? I'd say it's the best name proposed in this thread so far. BorderedSvg is probably the second contender. Regards. -- Kévin 'ervin' Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net "Ni le maître sans disciple, Ni le disciple sans maître, Ne font r

Re: 4.2: the binary compatible release

2008-10-19 Thread Marco Martin
On Sunday 19 October 2008, Riccardo Iaconelli wrote: > On Saturday 18 October 2008 21:15:03 Ivan Čukić wrote: > > BorderSvg/BorderedSvg > > Absolutely yes, BorderedSvg is much much better than PanelSvg. > Another suggestion, FramedSvg? > > -Riccardo FrameSvg, i prefer something that describes the t

Re: 4.2 feature targets

2008-10-19 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Sunday 19 October 2008, Aike J Sommer wrote: > So... Should we put it in 4.2?? If so, what do i need to do?? i'd like to see it in, yes. but this is more than just plasma. so: * move it into kdereview * email kde-core-devel explaining what it is, why we need it * be ready with the patches to p

Re: screensaver widgets

2008-10-19 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Saturday 18 October 2008, Chani wrote: > > ...I feel like there should be more than that. :) maybe there are things > > I lost and forgot, maybe I really am that close to being done. > > turns out there is more. > -in some cases the toolbox buttons are still in the wrong place when the > toolbox

Re: 4.2 feature targets

2008-10-19 Thread Guillaume Pothier
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 7:15 AM, Aike J Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would still love to get kephal in... I've hacking on it a little more and it > is now in a state where: > - it's a kded-module > - it defaults to "external" configuration now, that is, it wont mess with > existing layouts

Re: 4.2: the binary compatible release

2008-10-19 Thread Ivan Čukić
On Sunday, 19. October 2008. 17.08:36 Riccardo Iaconelli wrote: > On Saturday 18 October 2008 21:15:03 Ivan Čukić wrote: > > BorderSvg/BorderedSvg > > Absolutely yes, BorderedSvg is much much better than PanelSvg. I suggested the Border(something) because of Qt's Style Sheets. They have the border

Re: 4.2: the binary compatible release

2008-10-19 Thread Riccardo Iaconelli
On Saturday 18 October 2008 21:15:03 Ivan Čukić wrote: > or BorderSvg/BorderedSvg Yet another one, StretchableSvg? -Riccardo -- GPG key: 3D0F6376 When encrypting, please encrypt also for this subkey: 9EBD7FE1 - Pace Peace Paix Paz Frieden Pax Pokój Friður Fred Béke 和平 Hasiti Lapé Hetep Malu

Re: 4.2: the binary compatible release

2008-10-19 Thread Riccardo Iaconelli
On Saturday 18 October 2008 21:15:03 Ivan Čukić wrote: > BorderSvg/BorderedSvg Absolutely yes, BorderedSvg is much much better than PanelSvg. Another suggestion, FramedSvg? -Riccardo -- GPG key: 3D0F6376 When encrypting, please encrypt also for this subkey: 9EBD7FE1 - Pace Peace Paix Paz Fri

Re: Review Request: Improved extender theming

2008-10-19 Thread Marco Martin
On Saturday 18 October 2008, Nuno Pinheiro wrote: > > Diff: http://reviewboard.vidsolbach.de/r/222/diff > > > > > > Testing > > --- > > > > Done some testing om kuiserver and clock. > > > > > > Screenshots > > --- > > > > Screenshot of new extender theming > > http://reviewboard.vidso

Re: 4.2 feature targets

2008-10-19 Thread Aike J Sommer
Am Samstag 18 Oktober 2008 20:33:21 schrieb Aaron J. Seigo: > Hello =) > > the third thing we discussed at the meeting today was feature targets for > 4.2. these are all things that are doable by November 17th and must be in. > feel free to add to this thread, of course, and everything here should

Re: 4.2: the binary compatible release

2008-10-19 Thread Alex Merry
On Saturday 18 October 2008 20:15:03 Ivan Čukić wrote: > or BorderSvg/BorderedSvg +1 Alex -- Proud KDE hacker: http://www.kde.org Get KDE 4.1 - out now! signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Plasma-devel mailing l

Re: panel sizing of applets

2008-10-19 Thread Marco Martin
2008/10/19 Sebastian Kügler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > In the great tradition of "dive into code before reading all your emails > (because it's more fun)", here my issue of the day. > > Right now, the applets in the panel only grow smaller, but not bigger. Try > making the panel smaller, then bigger ag

Re: 4.2: the binary compatible release

2008-10-19 Thread Marco Martin
2008/10/19 Sebastian Kügler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Saturday 18 October 2008 21:50:10 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: >> > or BorderSvg/BorderedSvg >> >> this is closer to the reality. >> >> personally i don't have a problem with PanelSvg, as i don't think there is >> a "good" name for it. it's an odd duck