> ...I feel like there should be more than that. :) maybe there are things I
> lost and forgot, maybe I really am that close to being done.
>
turns out there is more.
-in some cases the toolbox buttons are still in the wrong place when the
toolbox is first shown (I'm seeing it in setup mode righ
Hi!
2008/10/18 Sebastian Kügler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Comments?
The same happens here only when I have the battery applet in the
panel. It happens on 2 other different machines too. As you said, it
looks like that if the panel gets bigger, everything else should get
bigger too...
Cheers!
--
Alex Merry wrote:
> On Saturday 18 October 2008 03:59:54 Dennis Kasprzyk wrote:
>> - Use XComposite to redirect the content of the normal systray icon (The
>> window will still be there and get input but won't display anything) -
>> Use QT/XRender to display the icon pixmap (this should even work
On Saturday 18 October 2008 21:50:10 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > or BorderSvg/BorderedSvg
>
> this is closer to the reality.
>
> personally i don't have a problem with PanelSvg, as i don't think there is
> a "good" name for it. it's an odd duck, and it'll have an odd duck name
> because of that.
>
>
2008/10/18 Aaron J. Seigo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Saturday 18 October 2008, Ivan Čukić wrote:
>> > StandardSvg (It is pretty much the default..)
>>
>> -1 confusing like the present one
>
> -1 here as well, for same reason
>
>> > BackgroundSvg (I don't believe its used anywhere for foreground stuf
In the great tradition of "dive into code before reading all your emails
(because it's more fun)", here my issue of the day.
Right now, the applets in the panel only grow smaller, but not bigger. Try
making the panel smaller, then bigger again, and you'll get a blank area at
the bottom (I and a
On Saturday 18 October 2008, Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
> > > - Added a virtual enabledBorderForItem(ExtenderItem*) to Extender.
> > > Depending on the setting of appearance, and the position of the item,
> > > this returns which background borders to enable.
> >
> > why is it virtual?
>
> So that subc
On Saturday 18 October 2008 21:33:03 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Saturday 18 October 2008, Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
> > ---
> > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> > http://reviewboard.vidsolbach.de/r/222/
> > --
A Saturday 18 October 2008 21:05:45, Rob Scheepmaker escreveu:
> On Saturday 18 October 2008 21:32:38 Nuno Pinheiro wrote:
> > Beter beter but still some visual glitches (like the un AA corners)
> > and the bar under is not needed its just shown if the extender is actulay
> > detached...
>
> Ye
On Saturday 18 October 2008 21:32:38 Nuno Pinheiro wrote:
> Beter beter but still some visual glitches (like the un AA corners) and
> the bar under is not needed its just shown if the extender is actulay
> detached...
Yes, it still needs some minor tweaks, but this is a good starting point, I
A Saturday 18 October 2008 19:26:59, Rob Scheepmaker escreveu:
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviewboard.vidsolbach.de/r/222/
> ---
>
> Revi
On Saturday 18 October 2008, Ivan Čukić wrote:
> > StandardSvg (It is pretty much the default..)
>
> -1 confusing like the present one
-1 here as well, for same reason
> > BackgroundSvg (I don't believe its used anywhere for foreground stuffs?)
>
> +1
it's really not about backgrounds, though. i
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.vidsolbach.de/r/226/#review223
---
the tooltip information is nice, but the view should still popup a
On Saturday 18 October 2008, Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviewboard.vidsolbach.de/r/222/
> ---
the diff on review
> StandardSvg (It is pretty much the default..)
-1 confusing like the present one
> BackgroundSvg (I don't believe its used anywhere for foreground stuffs?)
+1
or BorderSvg/BorderedSvg
Cheerio
--
There is a better way of life and it's not so hard to find
If you live and let the people in your
2008/10/18 Aaron J. Seigo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello =)
>
> the second thing we discussed at the meeting today was moving libplasma to
> kdelibs and guaranteeing binary compatibility starting with 4.2.
>
> here are our notes from the meeting:
>
> Binary Compatibility and kdelibs
>* The Plan
>
Hello =)
the third thing we discussed at the meeting today was feature targets for 4.2.
these are all things that are doable by November 17th and must be in. feel
free to add to this thread, of course, and everything here should be on the
feature plan.
* Core features
* libplasma
J
Hello =)
the second thing we discussed at the meeting today was moving libplasma to
kdelibs and guaranteeing binary compatibility starting with 4.2.
here are our notes from the meeting:
Binary Compatibility and kdelibs
* The Plan
* libplasma, in its entirety, in kdelibs for 4.2
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.vidsolbach.de/r/222/
---
Review request for Plasma.
Summary
---
This is an attempt to make the
Hello =)
the first thing we discussed at the meeting today was artwork targets for 4.2.
the list that follows is what we arrived at. it's already fairly large, and
the artists are working on other things as well for 4.2 so i'd like to not add
t much to this, but if there are glaring things
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.vidsolbach.de/r/226/
---
Review request for Plasma.
Summary
---
This is the first part of Devic
On Saturday 18 October 2008, Sven Burmeister wrote:
> Am Freitag, 17. Oktober 2008 20:10:50 schrieb Aaron J. Seigo:
> > On Friday 17 October 2008, Alexis Ménard wrote:
> > > yes but what about the time that it stay displayed?
> >
> > as anyone actually complained about that?
>
> If they can change
2008/10/18 Alessandro Diaferia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviewboard.vidsolbach.de/r/225/
> ---
>
> Review reques
Am Freitag, 17. Oktober 2008 20:10:50 schrieb Aaron J. Seigo:
> On Friday 17 October 2008, Alexis Ménard wrote:
> > yes but what about the time that it stay displayed?
>
> as anyone actually complained about that?
If they can change it, why should they complain?
Sven
_
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.vidsolbach.de/r/225/
---
Review request for Plasma.
Summary
---
This is the first part of Devic
On Saturday 18 October 2008 03:59:54 Dennis Kasprzyk wrote:
> - Use XComposite to redirect the content of the normal systray icon (The
> window will still be there and get input but won't display anything) - Use
> QT/XRender to display the icon pixmap (this should even work with the
> autohide anim
26 matches
Mail list logo
