Hello,
I m sure I will not be in OSCON, but if there is a possibily for you to go to
International PHP Conf, you will make certainly a very good session there, not lost
your job and certainly see me ;)).
International PHP Conference 2002 call for papers :
http://www.phpconference.de/2002/kt/i
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002 09:35:37 -0700
"Lazor, Ed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are benefits to this making the performance hit worthwhile in some
> instances.
Sure, the exceptions rules :).
I am not sure about your answer. The article where you pointed me does not go against
what we said, a
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002 11:24:31 -0700
"Lazor, Ed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aren't you saying that storing files on the local file system is generally
> faster than using database blobs?
In most cases I meet (mysql, pgsql and oracle), the filesystem methods were faster on
Linux and Solaris syst
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002 14:17:53 +0200
"andy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I am wondering if anybody has experiance in saving images to blob in mysql.
>
> I do save images with 1 K and 4 KB to blob fields while I used to save them
> to file. It seams to me that this is much slower acce
On Tue, 2 Jul 2002 05:45:40 +0200
"Andy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> is the increase of the network traffic noticable? The query is pretty small
> just text. Do u really think this might increase the traffic?
Try to heavely charge a DB with images inside it.
Do the same without DB, that depends
On Thu, 24 Jan 2002 15:45:34 -0800
Mike Eheler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I disagree based simply on two points:
>
> a) Ideally, the $HTTP_POST/GET and $_POST/$_GET vars should be treated
> as "read only".
I tell more : MUST be treated as readonly, as for every env/server or whatever
you want
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 14:20:36 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Greg Beaver) wrote:
> Edin Kadribasic wrote:
> > Windows binaries are now available at:
> >
> > PHP 5.0.4RC1
> > http://downloads.php.net/edink/php-5.0.4RC1-Win32.zip
> >
> > PHP 4.3.11RC1
> > http://downloads.php.net/edink/php-4.3.11RC1-Win3
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 10:26:09 +0100
"rush" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you see any other way to 'cache' some content?
Take a look at pear::cache or pear::cache_lite and pearweb. pearweb use
cache_lite to cache whole pages (when possible). To cache part of a page
(or whatever). pear::cache is m
8 matches
Mail list logo
