> Thank you for replying.
>> Just diff the HTML.
> Unfortunately it is not that easy. Even if the same PHP modules are
> present, if they are written into the page in a different place, they
> show up as differences. The same goes for all the HTML tags and
> everything else, so what I end up wi
> significant (around 46%), it says they only account for 193ms. What
> could account for that much difference between what xdebug calculates
> versus the total elapsed time?
Are you counting "total elapsed time" from the perspective of the web browser?
If so, YSlow might be helpful:
http://devel
> Nope. Basically it connects to a database to load an ACL (which at
> [...]
> I thought xdebug was supposed to be a pretty good profiler. If it
> calculating the time correctly, where are the other ~3.6 seconds
> going?
One night I saw a script wait indefinitely for a response from a tanked
datab
Per Jessen wrote:
> Which is exactly the bug I reported. An application that deliberately
> ignores the locale setting passed from the environment is buggy unless
> it is clearly documented. Why should a developer be forced to be aware
> of the locale when it has already been done for him? That
You can use http://us.php.net/mysql_real_escape_string to escape the
input.
[8<]
You should prep your data for insertion into the data by using a tool
that formats it strictly for the database. In the ops case
mysql_real_escape_string() is the correct tool for the job.
What about using prepa
Jim Lucas wrote:
>> I expected 'no match' but get 'match'.
[8<]
> cut/paste your code and it works for me.
Works for me as well. I get 'no match' from PHP 5.1.2, 5.2.6, and 5.2.8. What
version do you have?
If I might suggest a couple of simplifications that would make it easier to
follow/troubles
> I've been searching php.net for a function to do this:
>
>if page_url('browse.php') {
The $_SERVER global array has this sort of information. The 'PHP_SELF' key
might be what you want:
http://us.php.net/manual/en/reserved.variables.server.php
But where is the code that needs to know? I'm
Ben Dunlap wrote [TWICE]:
> The $_SERVER global array has this sort of information. The 'PHP_SELF' key
[8<]
> Ben
Very sorry for the double-post. Reply-all in Thunderbird News seems a little
overzealous by default.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsub
echo (preg_match($pattern, $test) != false)
>>
>> The " != false " here is redundant.
>
> Understood. But what you think is redundancy is, to me, clarity in
> programming. I happen to think that boolean tests shouldn't ride on
> whether or not an array returned from a function is empty or not
Ben Dunlap wrote:
> have -- "($x != false)" -- will be true whether $x is 0, NULL, an empty
> string,
[8<]
> But "$x !== false" will only be true in the last case.
Sorry, replace "be true" with "be false" above.
-Ben
--
PHP General Mail
Jim Lucas wrote:
> Miller, Terion wrote:
>> I Figured it out using this:
>>
>> if ($_SERVER['SCRIPT_FILENAME'] = "browse.php" ) {
>> $default = "A";
>> } else {
>> $default = "";
>> }
>>
>> $letter = isset($_GET['letter'])? $_GET['letter'] :"$default" ;
>
> unless you are doing more then w
> I don't THINK I need to worry about circular mappings... but I'm not
> sure how to check for it if I did...
>
> Any suggestions? Thanks!
Would the following work? It avoids recursion entirely and also checks for
circular mappings. You can plug in your own code where the comments are to do
whate
> while (isset($FieldMap[$Field]) {
Oops, left out the final close-parenthesis. I always do that with isset() for
some reason.
Ben
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Miller, Terion wrote:
> if ($_SERVER['SCRIPT_FILENAME'] = "browse.php" ) {
You're using the assignment operator above ('=') instead of the comparison
('=='). If that's not simply a typo that entered the code when you composed
your email, then that's the source of your problem.
You might cons
> Sorry... I'm using GET. I have used the code you supplied below,
> but as I mentioned, it gets sent for every itemid in the table. I needs
> to be sent only once, and right after the action. That's where I'm
> stumped.
Hidden form inputs should work with GET or POST -- they're only "hidde
> sorry man, but a good data design keeps only data in a table u can not
> calculate. in ur case that would be only and time.
> refernces to user and project/tasks in other tables.
>
> ur time sheet is definately a job for a report. that type of design limits u
> to nothing. a user can start an
> In my navigation.php include file, I had if ($page = about) echo href
> I changed it to if ($page == about) echo and it suddenly worked! Imagine
> that...
Another good case for putting the variable on the right side of "==":
if ("about" == $page)
Then if you mis-type "==" as "=", PH
> OK, I think I understand most points except the start and stop time.
> Every time sheet I have used, SAP and several other smaller ones, I
> enter a weeks worth of time data like:
>
> Project Sun Mon TuesWed ThurFri Sat
>
> I don't have any data blobs in my database - which makes incremental
> backups easier - I use rsync for files and do a nightly mysql dump.
> Except for the first of the month, the diff of that nights backup
> compared to first of month is saved to flat file for rsync. Binary blobs
> in the databa
> I need some assistance in pattern matching. I want allow the admin user
> to enter a pattern to be matched in my order form editor. When someone
> then places an order I want to do a match based on that pattern.
Will your admin users know how to use regular expressions?
If not, can you reason
> changes to the code or to the files, just one day all of a sudden any
> time someone purchases a DMG, EXE, PDF, etc. they get zero bytes. I've
[8<]
> Has anyone ever heard of something (besides my code and my files) that
> could cause this behavior? You'll be my best friend if you can help.
> Tha
> Very interesting. Excellent debugging advice. It's giving me a 500
> error, probably why the Rackspace techs told me to check my code:
>
> HTTP/1.0 500 Internal Server Error
Did you get that 500 while running curl from a machine outside of Rackspace's
network?
If so, I'd be interested to see w
> > $pattern = '|^.+?display:none.+?$|mi';
[8<]
> I found your use of ? rather... creative... Anyway, just add the
You mean the non-greedy flag? I think that's necessary the way the
regex was originally formulated -- without it, ".+display" would
gobble up all of the list-items until the last one
> But on another site it still works, but gives this error:
> Notice: Undefined index: UserWishesDateRange in
> /home/vs/site/phvs/bl/7solarsecrets/admin/trackingcode.html on line 79
>
> I assume that is because the error display settings are set to a more
> rigorous level in this latter site.
> Is
> $shows = array();
> $show_01 = array();
> $show_01['title'] = 'Van Cliburn Gold Medal Winner';
> $show_01['date'] = 'Tues. 10/13/2009';
> $show_01['time'] = '11am';
> $show_01['price'] = 4.00;
> $show_01['soldout'] = 0; //IF THE SHOW SELLS OUT, CHANGE "0" to "1"
> (without quotations).
> $
> I am using the print function to display my html. I cannot get the line
> return ( \n ) character to actually push the html onto the next line, it
> just gets displayed instead. Should I be using echo?
In the PHP code snippet you pasted above, you're using single-quotes
to delimit your literal s
> # before was $styles = array( 'even', 'odd' );
> # after new requirements it is...
> $styles = array( 'white', 'white', 'gray' );
> foreach($items as $item)
> {
> printf( '%s', current( $styles ), $item );
>
> next( $styles ) or reset( $styles );
> }
>
>
+5000. I think is by far the most readabl
> statements, it becomes unmaintainable very quickly, use a templating
> language, ether with a framework(recomended) or standalone.
But he /is/ using a templating language... PHP. ;-)
Ben
>
> Personally I try to not use double quoted.
> PHP parses single quoted very much faster.
>
> # for this
> echo "Hi, $name, wellcome $home";
>
> # I use
> echo 'Hi, ', $name, ', wellcome ', $home;
>
I'm not sure if this was true in older versions of PHP, but it's not so much
any more, and I wond
> @Adam
> The headers_sent() wasa test to ensure that no other data was creeping
> into the headers before I wanted it to. Keeping it in does no harm, as
> it is basically saying, if there are no headers that have been sent,
> send the correct ones for the image.
But if there are headers that ha
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Ben Dunlap wrote:
>
> @Adam
>> The headers_sent() wasa test to ensure that no other data was creeping
>> into the headers before I wanted it to. Keeping it in does no harm, as
>> it is basically saying, if there are no headers that hav
> # before was $styles = array( 'even', 'odd' );
>>> # after new requirements it is...
>>> $styles = array( 'white', 'white', 'gray' );
>>> foreach($items as $item)
>>> {
>>> printf( '%s', current( $styles ), $item );
>>>
>>> next( $styles ) or reset( $styles );
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>> +5000. I think i
> statements, it becomes unmaintainable very quickly, use a templating
>>> language, ether with a framework(recomended) or standalone.
>>>
>>
>>
>> But he /is/ using a templating language... PHP. ;-)
>>
>
> Keep telling yourself that... and be sure to pat your own back.
>
I'm sure there are plenty
>
> I have the following code for order_update.php:
>
> [code]
>
> session_start();
> extract($_POST);
> foreach ($_POST as $var => $val) {
> if ($val > 0) {
> $_SESSION[$var] = $val;
> } else {
> unset($var);
>
> }
> header("Location: order_process.php");
> }
>
> [/code]
>
> This is not work
> Thanks all for your patience! I will work on this today and write back with
> any further questions I can't figure out on my own. And if anyone has any
> advice I will be checking my email regularly.
If you've already tried this with no luck, please ignore -- but you
might speed up the whole pro
2009/8/14 João Cândido de Souza Neto :
> I think a good solution is to put the ini file out of your html folder so
> only your scripts can read it.
I agree, and I try to do the same, but I've noticed that most
open-source CMSes I've looked at (Drupal, Joomla, Textpattern, CMS
Made Simple) have a
> 1) Name your ini files .php so, database.ini will be database.php
Actually I was assuming the configuration file to be a PHP script --
as is typical in big open-source CMSes. I took "ini file" earlier in
the thread to be a generic description of any file, whatever the
extension, that contains se
> "Note: If this function is not used to escape data, the query is
> vulnerable to SQL Injection Attacks."
>
> Does that necessarily imply this:
> "If this function is used to escape data, the query is not vulnerable
> to SQL Injection Attacks."?
>
> Logically, it does _not_ mean the same thing.
D
> This is a newbie question...
> Let's say there are 3 php files, page1.php, page2.php and page3.php. Form
> submission from page1.php or page2.php will take user to page3.php.
> I know that we can use parameter that is appended in the action attribute of
> the form (e.g )
> But I think, appending
>> $stmt = $db->prepare("SELECT priv FROM testUsers WHERE
>> username=:username AND password=:password");
>> $stmt->bindParam(':username', $user);
>> $stmt->bindParam(':password', $pass);
>> $stmt->execute();
[8<]
> I haven't followed this thread, so I don't know what you mean by, "I
> do not see h
> That's exactly the case. I have been running my business on a Perl
> cart for the last 5+ years, and I can't switch to a PHP cart just yet. I
> was just hoping to add some functionality with PHP. Perl was much harder
It would probably bomb your performance but you could always call a
s
> We have a server with a site that does some XML calls. After lots of testing
> I have found that the server is losing session variables.
[8<]
> Also the site goes from HTTP to HTTPS at some point but this isn't the issue
> as it loses the sessions as soon as they are set sometimes.
>
> Therefore
> $fName = $_REQUEST['fName'] ;
> $emailid = $_REQUEST['emailid'] ;
> $number = $_REQUEST['number'] ;
> $message = $_REQUEST['message'] ;
>
> mail( "ch...@gmail.com", $number, $message, "From: $emailid" );
> header( "Location: http://www.thankyou.com/thankYouContact.php"; );
> ?>
This is
> ISTR the Royal Air Force has a "Specialist Aircrew" track where the really
> good
> pilots, who wanted to fly planes rather than desks, could be promoted to
> "management" ranks but avoid the management duties.
They had a position like this at the first big company I worked for --
"Member of th
> another change in the email admin best practices discussion. For a short
> while the network became clogged in bounce messages sent to both valid
> and invalid addresses. Some of the invalid addresses even triggered
> infinite loops of error messages. None of the servers I am familiar with
> send
> Semiconductor is one example. But this only seems to work at large
> companies. I think the biggest problem is that HR types don't want to
> acknowledge these types of people exist. It doesn't fit their nice
> little arrangement of pigeon holes.
And perhaps at many smaller companies the payroll
> The second problem is that it still forces the originating SMTP server
> to pass on the 5xx error as a bounce message to the originator.
Yeah, I guess this would be a problem in cases where the originating
server is an open relay that's being exploited by a spammer. I wonder
what proportion of s
> You might try to use the reported IP of the submitter, again unique, but
> that can be forged -- so again anyone can vote more than once.
Can you say more about forging the reported IP? I've always been under
the impression that forging the source IP in a TCP session is a pretty
sophisticated op
> Sort of. Create two tables a login table with user details and a specific
> field for a ROLE.
>
> Then create a roles table that lists the various permissions. I store this
[8<]
> This process is significantly simpler when managing users, it's easier to
> adjust permissions on one role than to ed
> Yes, they offer an additional layer of granularity on permissions. The apps
> I write use groups and role to limit acces to certain functionality. The
> roles determine functional access to records, ie what the user can do with
> them. The groups membership determines what records the user can se
> Which format should I used for log file? *.log or *.txt?
Doesn't matter to PHP -- but you do need to provide a local path, not a URL.
> [http://domain.com/log/logfile.*] or
No...
> [C:\some_path\domain.com\log\logfile.*] or just
Yes!
Ben
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
T
I was surprised when no one recommended this:
if ($_SERVER['REQUEST_METHOD'] == 'POST')
So now I'm wondering if there's a pitfall to this method that I'm not
aware of...
Thanks,
Ben
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> Well, as far as I'm aware $_SERVER isn't reliable from server to server.
> That said, I've never had a problem using it.
Thanks -- I just looked it up and the manual says: "There is no
guarantee that every web server will provide any of these; servers may
omit some, or provide others not listed
> 1. Menu of what type of merge you want to do. (Initialize working table)
> 2. Process Data File (Initialize working table and then load in new data)
> 3. Build Email
> 4. Send out Email
How many PHP scripts correspond to these 4 steps? Is it one script (or
more) for each step? For example:
st
> I would set up Wireshark to capture and compare the http sequences from
> each browser. After you capture each stream, use the "Follow TCP Stream"
> option to look at the raw HTTP. If it is the browsers, there should be
> some obvious differences in the sequence of requests from them.
This is a
> Safe mode is a bad idea. :) It's not safe; it may only have the effect
> of making you think you're safe. If you have a particular reason to
> use it then maybe it's OK, but just be aware that it will not exist in
> future versions of PHP and relying on it is not a good idea. Security,
> unfortun
> What I would do for UK PHP events :-(
Something like this perhaps?
http://conference.phpnw.org.uk/phpnw09/
Ben
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> Is there another way to cleanly wrap method calls for timing/logging
> purposes?
I have a possibly-evil idea that gets around type-hinting by
dynamically declaring decorator classes as children of the real
classes that need to be timed. You end up with as many "decorators" as
you have classes th
> code. Instead, just use interfaces. The only real downside is that
> all the classes you want to decorate would need to implement them and
> that would cause a wee bit of ugliness in the code/class declaration.
Can you explain a bit more? As I understood the OP, the challenge was
to take a lar
> Is there is a way to search only for the alphanumeric content of
> field in a db? I have an itemID field that contains item #'s that include
> dashes, forward slashes, etc, and I want people to be able to search for an
> item # even if they don't enter the punctuation exactly.
Not sure i
> Excuse me? Somebody suggested a PHP loop to solve a query problem and you are
> saying that REGEXP should not be used?
> MySQL caches queries and 100 SELECT with a REGEXP will cost zero after the
> first one if nothing changed inside the table.
Even if the REGEXP has to change with every query
> What's wrong with using the wildcards that are built into most SQL
> variants?
>
> SELECT * FROM table WHERE item_id LIKE '%#abcdef'
>
> Will select all records where the item_id field ends in '#abcdef'
That works if you know the user is always going to enter the last 7
characters of the product
> I followed this thread:
> "
> http://spikomoko.wordpress.com/2009/08/19/magento-not-working-on-php-5-3/
> ".
>
> But then, I'm bounched on this error in my webbrowser for visitting my
> magento on my production server desktop:
> "
> .:
> Fatal error: Call to a member function createDirIfNotExists
>
> stripping, stemming, spelling corrections ?
> ... uhm, that's probably why they invented regular expressions, isn't it?
>
> As I said, at the end of the day, this will be a manual slow, potentially
> wrong implementation of what we already have and use on daily basis.
If you've got a regular
> $map = ms_newMapObj($mapfile);
>
> The command creates a new mapscript object.
>
>
And PHP is hanging somewhere inside that constructor? Is this in a web
context or a command-line context? Or both?
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 2:38 PM, jim white wrote:
> It's a web app that draws maps in a browser. Sometime it will generate a
> seg fault. The command should not take long, so if there is some script
> construct that will throw an exception after a few seconds if the command
> has not completed I c
>
> My solution was to add a table to my database, and add an insert job id
> into the table after the line that is causing the problem. When I submit the
> script I use setTimeout to run an AJAX query of the table 5 seconds later.
> If the line has failed the job id will not be in the table and I
> The object only exists for that instance of the script, so when the user
> navigates to the next page, the object is freed up from the memory.
> There are a couple of ways you could get round this:
>
> * don't navigate away from the page, and use AJAX calls to update
> parts of the pa
> I thought this code:
>
> $enc=mcrypt_ecb(MCRYPT_RIJNDAEL_256,"salt123","encrypt_me",MCRYPT_ENCRYPT);
> $dec=mcrypt_ecb(MCRYPT_RIJNDAEL_256,"salt123",$enc,MCRYPT_DECRYPT);
> echo $dec;
>
> would yield "encrypt_me". The actual result is
> "encrypt_me.." (bunch of extra dots).
>
> echo gethostbyname('www.google.de')."\n";
> print_r(dns_get_record('www.google.de', DNS_A))."\n";
> ?>
[8<]
> I don't understand why the first lookup fails, but the second one succeeds.
> Unfortunately thinks like fsockopen() seem to use the same technique as
> gethostbyname(), so they don't wor
> I was under the impression that sqlite2 was supported widely by PHP,
> but sqlite3 seems only to be enabled on php 5.3.0 by default.
>
> My concern now is actually that users may find that their hosting
> service providers don't provide sqlite3 out of the box.
PDO seems to support both versions:
> $dbh = new PDO('sqlite:$db_file');
[8<]
> $dbh = new PDO('sqlite2:$db_file');
But with double-quotes, not single-quotes. ;-)
Ben
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
I have a php cli script that listens on a UDP socket and, when data is
[8<]
>> So I think the the MSG_WAITALL is causing it to block until incoming
>> data connection is closed (it never reaches the 512 byte mark before
[8<]
> your "clients" are not maintaining an open connection to the socket
> So I'm trying to set up a small website that includes a store (
> www.rareintaglio.com), i have all of my HTML hammed out and now I'm working
> on creating an admin login for the sites owner to input data from a back
I would really strongly advise against building your own
authentication system.
> several packages available to provide it. But I believe that telling
> someone to adopt a complete portal system like CI just to get basic
> authentication is gross overkill. There has to be a better way to
> provide this core functionality without installing a monster package
> that will be 95%
> I would recommend this to anyone looking to build any sort of web app.
> Could be that nothing out there will end up serving your purposes, but
... and, on further investigation, it looks like CI, surprisingly
enough, doesn't actually have pre-built authentication and access
control (although it
> I assume that I can get increment value/sequence from db (I used harcoded
> increment value in the code above (generate_id(1))),
> but I don't know how I can get this incremental value from db.I use mysql
> 5.0.
If you're thinking of retrieving the newest value of an AUTO_INCREMENT
column, imm
> Moreover, I'm using CI right now, and as far as I know, it does *no*
> user authentication. I had to write my own routines, using their session
> class to save the user data.
Yeah, I realized that too (hence my last post to this thread) -- so,
scratch CI for the present purpose.
Ben
--
PHP Ge
> Examine this:
>
> http://webbytedd.com/a/ajax-site/js/a.js
>
> Now, where can something go wrong?
I suppose slave.php could fail with a 4xx or 5xx response. Then, most
likely, the user would be left clicking on a link that does nothing.
In an edge case the body of the error-response might includ
> Honestly, whipping up a security scheme the way I have done it is a
> couple of days' work (including login and management screens). I'm not
> sure why people seem to be averse to it. You just work up your screens,
I suppose it does depend on the use case. If you're building a system
for interna
> 1. user A insert into table (get id = 1 from auto increment value)
> 2. user B insert into table (get id = 2 from auto increment value)
> 3. user A get value from $id = LAST_INSERT_ID() (id = 2)
> 4. user B get value from $id = LAST_INSERT_ID() (id =2)
[8<]
> How can we make sure that those 3 pro
> upload keys, and any keys created via apc_add(). This listing includes a
> Timeout value, which is "none" for the apc_add keys and 3600 for the upload
> keys. Somewhat suspicious, I'd say, since the keys stop being working after
> 1 hour of use.
>
> APC lets you set a number of timeout values: ap
> have IE 6 for whatever reason. If you block them then you are blocking
> possible clients. There is still a large percentage that still use it.
I think that percentage depends on the target audience. There was a
kerfuffle several months back (maybe a year ago now?) when 37signals
announced that
> I was afraid it was a bug. I have generally just used whatever is at
> whatever host, until this project, and didn't really think something so
> glaring could be in there. WTF!
I wonder if massive uploads, like the ones you're coding for, really
aren't that common. I can imagine hard-coding that
> I bought a Windows XP PC about three years ago with IE6 on it (I
> normally do all my work in Linux). I haven't upgraded it, and I can't
> imagine why the average user would. If it ain't broke (and most users
> wouldn't consider IE6 broken), don't fix it.
I agree in general, but eventually Micro
> if ... you have
> output_buffering option enabled in the php configuration.
Which is probably the case on the OP's local machine, and would
explain why the code doesn't fail for him there.
Ben
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.ph
> The fundamental idea was to fill in a contact forum , submit it and then go
> to an upload page.
By "upload", do you mean "transmit the information that the user
entered into the contact form"? Or is the upload page supposed to do
something separate from the contact form?
Ben
--
PHP General
Sounds like you have 64-bit LDAP libraries installed on your system.
Do you also have 32-bit libraries installed, but PHP is ignoring them?
The --with-ldap configure option tells PHP where to look for ldap.h
and libldap.a -- but not directly. Here's the relevant bit from
php-src/trunk/ext/ldap/con
> I will look into getting from one page to the next page after a Submit
If it's any help, I've got a light-weight contact-form code on github,
that's meant to be dropped into an otherwise-static site with minimal
fuss: http://github.com/bdunlap/Drop-in-Widgets/tree/master/contactform/
It uses a
> $file = 'invoicetable_bottom.php';
> fopen("http://yoursite.com/folder/$file","r";);
>
> http://tr.php.net/function.fopen
>
> worth trying. Easier than output buffering
Easier in what sense? It would end up requiring more code than
output-buffering because you'd have to read from the file after
> I attempted to use the same functions as FPDI/FPDF, but they did not
> work in TCPDF.
Which functions did you use in FPDF?
Ben
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> php not but perhaps the client its not clear and commonly defined what
> clients do with cookies on reconnect and stuff or long idle times.
Maybe not, but I'd be really surprised. An HTTP client is supposed to
decide whether to send a cookie by looking at the domain name and path
of the URL it's
> Suppose I have a variable $i = 0 or 1 or 2
> and I have variables $item0, $item1 and $item2
> how do I print the variable $item0 using a combination of variable $item and
> variable $i?
> or with this code it gives me an error:
> $i = 0;
> $item0 = "test";
> echo $item$i; #how do I properly use t
>>> \r\n should be between double quotes: "\r\n"
I think you'll still see the literal ""s in your final email,
though because htmlspecialchars() is converting the angle-brackets in
the tag to their respective HTML entities ("<" for "<" and ">"
for ">").
A bit of a thorny problem because you proba
> to make sure the user has properly filled out this form. So I have to
> validate it. That's done in the background on the server, naturally. But
> once the validating is done, it's time to send the user off to the
> secure site with a payload of POST variables. At that point, the user
> will ente
> $line = fgets($handle);
>
> list($col1, $col2, $col3) = $line;
[8<]
> echo "c1 is $col1 and c2 is $col2 and c3 is $col3".''; // this shows
> just 1st char of each field
That's odd, I would have expected $col1, $col2, and $col3 to be NULL.
That's what I get when I try to assign a string to list()
> Yes. But since I don't want to display a success information + form fields,
> but only the success information,
> I believe the only way we have to do this is by either use javascript and
> update a div or similar, or using only php, by redirecting to another page.
>
> Is this correct?
Whether o
> Can someone PLEASE explain why the developers of PHP chose this seemingly
> whacky logic?
It mimicks C.
Ben
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> My issue is that I see no reason to do the ASSIGNMENT FIRST and THEN
> INCREMENT.
>
> That's just counter intuitive. In the case of $foo = $num++, everything to
> the right of the = should be computed FIRST and THEN handed off to the left
> side. This particular expression (and I'm unaware of any
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Ben Dunlap wrote:
>> My issue is that I see no reason to do the ASSIGNMENT FIRST and THEN
>> INCREMENT.
>>
>> That's just counter intuitive. In the case of $foo = $num++, everything to
>> the right of the = should be computed FI
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
