On 12/12/2012 5:25 PM, Marco Behnke wrote:
Am 12.12.12 15:58, schrieb Jim Giner:
On 12/12/2012 8:08 AM, ma...@behnke.biz wrote:
Jim Giner hat am 12. Dezember 2012 um
02:53
geschrieben:
On 12/11/2012 7:27 PM, Marco Behnke wrote:
Am 08.12.12 19:08, schrieb Jim Giner:
All my debugging messag
Thanks for the input gentlemen. Two opposing viewpoints!
I understand the concept of using files for the docs and a table to
locate them and id them. But I am of the opinion that modern dbs are
capable of handling very large objects (of which these docs are NOT!)
much easier than years ago,
Am 13.12.12 14:49, schrieb Jim Giner:
>
>> Ok, that is a different answer from the previous one where you said "it
>> points to a folder within my main domain's structure"
>>
>> Are you running on error_reporting(E_ALL) and ini_set('display_errors',
>> 'On')?
>> Just to be sure that there are no hi
On 12/13/2012 9:16 AM, Marco Behnke wrote:
Am 13.12.12 14:49, schrieb Jim Giner:
Ok, that is a different answer from the previous one where you said "it
points to a folder within my main domain's structure"
Are you running on error_reporting(E_ALL) and ini_set('display_errors',
'On')?
Just to
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Jim Giner wrote:
> Thanks for the input gentlemen. Two opposing viewpoints!
>
> I understand the concept of using files for the docs and a table to locate
> them and id them. But I am of the opinion that modern dbs are capable of
> handling very large objects (of
On 12/13/2012 9:19 AM, Matijn Woudt wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Jim Giner wrote:
I'm not sure if there's much difference between large text fields and
blobs, but I had a database (MySQL) with rows that had one blob each of
5-10 mb. At around 200-300 rows the database was pretty s
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Jim Giner wrote:
> On 12/13/2012 9:19 AM, Matijn Woudt wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Jim Giner
>> **wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> I'm not sure if there's much difference between large text fields and
>> blobs, but I had a database (MySQL) with rows that had
Bastien Koert
On 2012-12-13, at 9:10 AM, Jim Giner wrote:
> Thanks for the input gentlemen. Two opposing viewpoints!
>
> I understand the concept of using files for the docs and a table to locate
> them and id them. But I am of the opinion that modern dbs are capable of
> handling very la
On 12/13/2012 10:56 AM, Bastien wrote:
Bastien Koert
On 2012-12-13, at 9:10 AM, Jim Giner wrote:
Thanks for the input gentlemen. Two opposing viewpoints!
I understand the concept of using files for the docs and a table to locate them
and id them. But I am of the opinion that modern dbs
Ah ha. Did that ever get ported to Zend 2?
--Larry Garfield
On 12/12/12 12:07 AM, Louis Huppenbauer wrote:
There's Zend_Search_Lucene, part of the Zend framework. I think it should
be possible to use it without the whole framework though.
http://framework.zend.com/manual/1.12/de/zend.search.l
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Jim Giner wrote:
> On 12/13/2012 10:56 AM, Bastien wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Bastien Koert
>>
>> On 2012-12-13, at 9:10 AM, Jim Giner
>> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the input gentlemen. Two opposing viewpoints!
>>>
>>> I understand the concept of using files for the docs an
On Thu, 2012-12-13 at 18:41 +0100, Matijn Woudt wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Jim Giner
> wrote:
>
> > On 12/13/2012 10:56 AM, Bastien wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Bastien Koert
> >>
> >> On 2012-12-13, at 9:10 AM, Jim Giner
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks for the input gentlemen. Two o
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Matijn Woudt wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Jim Giner
> wrote:
>
>> On 12/13/2012 10:56 AM, Bastien wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Bastien Koert
>>>
>>> On 2012-12-13, at 9:10 AM, Jim Giner
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks for the input gentlemen. Two opposing view
On 12/13/2012 2:40 PM, Bastien Koert wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Matijn Woudt wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Jim Giner wrote:
On 12/13/2012 10:56 AM, Bastien wrote:
Bastien Koert
On 2012-12-13, at 9:10 AM, Jim Giner
wrote:
Thanks for the input gentlemen. Two op
Thanks for all the posts. After reading and googling all afternoon, I
think the best approach for me is:
Create two macros in Word (done!) to export each of my .doc files to
.txt and .pdf formats.
Create a sql table to hold the .txt contents of my .doc files, along
with a reference to the m
On 12/13/2012 02:49 PM, Jim Giner wrote:
Thanks for all the posts. After reading and googling all afternoon, I
think the best approach for me is:
Create two macros in Word (done!) to export each of my .doc files to
.txt and .pdf formats.
Create a sql table to hold the .txt contents of my .doc f
16 matches
Mail list logo
