Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 12:21 -0400, Micheleh Davis wrote:
>
>> Please help. My form validation worked fine until I added the terms check
>> at the bottom. Any ideas?
>>
>>
>>
>> //form validation step one
>>
>> function validateStep1(myForm){
>>
>> //
'Twas brillig, and Jay Blanchard at 12/08/09 17:32 did gyre and gimble:
[snip]
I'm interested to know why you consider this to be very flexible and how
this leaves the selection in the database's hands?
[/snip]
Flexible because I can connect to more than one database on a server
using one conne
Hi Ralph.
If u want to understand the Martin's job u need to read about
design patterns. A good place to start? Wikipedia (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Design_Patterns).
The use of Design patterns is an advanced programming method.
It helps us to improve our object oriented programation.
I hope
[snip]
So perhaps it depends on your view point and preconceptions and we're
both coming at the "flexible" and "offloading" arguments with different
starting views.
Anyway, I only asked out of curiosity which I think has been satisfied
(i.e. ultimately I don't fully agree with you! :p).
[/snip]
Hi,
I downloaded PHP 5.3.0, and since then I can't use fbird_connect. When I
inspected the installed files, I realized that php_interbase.dll is not there!
Where is it? Or where can I get it?
SanTa
just for example's sake, say i were doing something like
$ch = curl_init();
curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_URL, 'ftp://user:p...@server/dir/filename');
curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_UPLOAD, true);
curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_FILE, $outfileh);
curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_INFILE, $infileh);
curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_
Hi all.
Is this going to save me anything?
something() )
return true;
something() )
return true;
--
Martin Scotta
Thanks Jaime,
very nice, but I'm a programmer since 1982 and into OOP since 1988 with the
outcome if IBM's C++ compiler on the OS2 platform.
Don't u think it could be reasonable to ask if such an overhead IN PHP is
necessary?
does anybody agree that PHP might be the wrong language to accomplish
I dont think so, because PHP is an interpreter, the string 'something' has
to be extracted and then be put in memory after that the code will compare
the two memory locations. doesnt give me any benefit.
however, comparing strings with the '==' does involve case sensitivity and
also leading or tra
Hi,
Is there a way (other than using __LINE__ and __FILE__) to determine
which file & line called a function/method? I would like to add some
debugging information to a method but I don't want to have to go through
to each line that calls it and add the __LINE__ and __FILE__
parameters. Gue
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Matt Giddings wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way (other than using __LINE__ and __FILE__) to determine which
> file & line called a function/method? I would like to add some debugging
> information to a method but I don't want to have to go through to each line
> tha
Matt Giddings wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way (other than using __LINE__ and __FILE__) to determine
which file & line called a function/method? I would like to add some
debugging information to a method but I don't want to have to go through
to each line that calls it and add the __LINE__ and __FI
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Ralph Deffke wrote:
> Thanks Jaime,
>
> very nice, but I'm a programmer since 1982 and into OOP since 1988 with the
> outcome if IBM's C++ compiler on the OS2 platform.
>
> Don't u think it could be reasonable to ask if such an overhead IN PHP is
> necessary?
>
>
Thanks for the pointers!
Matt
Robert Cummings wrote:
Matt Giddings wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way (other than using __LINE__ and __FILE__) to determine
which file & line called a function/method? I would like to add some
debugging information to a method but I don't want to have to go
through
Hi Ralph,
Sorry, I haven't understand your question.
Do you think OOP isn't usefull for PHP? The PHP
task is just to output a text file but the process might involve
a lot of work: database access, communication with web services, etc.
Do you think duplicate code is better than use more memory?
funny then that I see here serious people discussing the benefit of
shortening code and cutting out commends.
maby thats a general problem of our society that everybody think higher
cheaper faster. this will have a limit guys !!! u can not go smaler then an
atom.
funny as well that I make my main
I use a combination of procedural and OOP for my scripts. Mainly
because I have a lot of old code I wrote before I understood OOP. Now
that I do it makes my life so much easier because of the
organizational and reusability benefits. In today's world I will
gladly trade a little overhead
NO NO NO
OOP is the best ever inventet !
see my comments on this list, I will also come up with an pure oop
opensource OMS very soon.
I just think a dam big pattern catalog like this one is like an elephant
chacing mice. I mean I can think of customers asking for a documentation of
course of
Sándor Tamás (HostWare Kft.) wrote:
Hi,
I downloaded PHP 5.3.0, and since then I can't use fbird_connect. When I
inspected the installed files, I realized that php_interbase.dll is not there!
Where is it? Or where can I get it?
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/firebird-php/files/
The discus
Ralph Deffke napsal(a):
NO NO NO
OOP is the best ever inventet !
see my comments on this list, I will also come up with an pure oop
opensource OMS very soon.
I just think a dam big pattern catalog like this one is like an elephant
chacing mice. I mean I can think of customers asking for a
Ralph Deffke wrote:
funny then that I see here serious people discussing the benefit of
shortening code and cutting out commends.
maby thats a general problem of our society that everybody think higher
cheaper faster. this will have a limit guys !!! u can not go smaler then an
atom.
funny as
Martin Zvarík wrote:
Ralph Deffke napsal(a):
NO NO NO
OOP is the best ever inventet !
see my comments on this list, I will also come up with an pure oop
opensource OMS very soon.
I just think a dam big pattern catalog like this one is like an elephant
chacing mice. I mean I can think of
Robert Cummings wrote:
>
>
> Martin Zvarík wrote:
>> Ralph Deffke napsal(a):
>>> NO NO NO
>>>
>>> OOP is the best ever inventet !
>>>
>>> see my comments on this list, I will also come up with an pure oop
>>> opensource OMS very soon.
>>>
>>> I just think a dam big pattern catalog like this o
but what Im asking is that the reality?
go and talk to accountant and tell them after spending soansomuch for the
new site hes has to buy a new server ! what will acountant say, what u
think.
another more important point is in reality u take a project on on a specific
hardware base. lets say it a
Greg I completly aggree, but dont miss the point that I'M adigted to OOP
WHY NOT A FRAMEWORK CLOSER TO THE REAL POINT CALLED DOM
design pattern for HTML XHTML XML SVG Database conection and retrieving.
WHY CLASSES FOR CALLERS AND RECEIVERS AND INTERPRETERS.
a is it a caller? a receiver?
why t
[snip]
u can not go smaler then an atom.
[/snip]
Neutrons, electrons, gluons, protons particles all smaller than an
atom. There are others if you want to get into a discussion of quantum
physics and mechanics, but we should probably take that discussion
offline.
Many folks here are building
Ralph Deffke wrote:
but what Im asking is that the reality?
go and talk to accountant and tell them after spending soansomuch for the
new site hes has to buy a new server ! what will acountant say, what u
think.
another more important point is in reality u take a project on on a specific
hardwa
At 12:32 PM -0400 8/13/09, Robert Cummings wrote:
With respect to why you see "shortening of code and cutting out
comments", perhaps you are referring to the recent Calendar thread,
where a bunch of us were just having some good old optimization fun.
I for one enjoy the occasional diversion of
for those of u not being a physician
semiconductors are of pretty big atoms, but this is not the main problem,
the problem is that u have to cut out structures off these semiconductors
in order to build faster computers this matters.
many physicians believe that we are pretty close to a ultimate
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Ralph Deffke wrote:
> for those of u not being a physician
>
> semiconductors are of pretty big atoms, but this is not the main problem,
> the problem is that u have to cut out structures off these semiconductors
> in order to build faster computers this matters.
so guys
why u don't discuss Martins outcome?
is there no advice, idears?
isn't there a need for it?
nobody want to use it?
I WANT TO LEARN
ralph_def...@yahoo.de
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Ralph Deffke wrote:
so guys
why u don't discuss Martins outcome?
is there no advice, idears?
isn't there a need for it?
nobody want to use it?
I WANT TO LEARN
Maybe it's your grasp of the English language, maybe not. But I detect
an air of aggression to your posts.
ARE YOU JUST TROLLING?
Ralph Deffke wrote:
> for those of u not being a physician
>
> semiconductors are of pretty big atoms, but this is not the main problem,
> the problem is that u have to cut out structures off these semiconductors
> in order to build faster computers this matters.
>
> many physicians believe that
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Ralph Deffke wrote:
> so guys
>
> why u don't discuss Martins outcome?
> is there no advice, idears?
> isn't there a need for it?
> nobody want to use it?
>
> I WANT TO LEARN
>
> ralph_def...@yahoo.de
>
>
>
> --
> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> T
well u got to know me personal, however may be u mix it with sarcasm?
may be I can't express that as good as I want in english.
if u follow the posts didn't some put me in the stupid corner?
I think its legal to ask why the question of Martin are not discussed.
and I still think, my question what
Hi Martin,
thanks for ur efforts, this is a lot of good work.
for my opinion the start is a bit too much theoretical and valid for all
type of application. In simple words, u are too close to the book.
I would love to have something closer to the purpose of PHP
and its applications.
if u have a
[snip]. Cryptic crap does
> not mean that you're a clever programmer, it only shows that you don't know
> any better.
[/snip]
I know people like this
--
Bastien
Cat, the other other white meat
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.
I am asking a similar question to one I asked yesterday (which received no
answers) with more information in the hopes someone will be kind enough to
guide me.
I have an order form populated with an array (as opposed to a database
table). The user can enter quantities, and the form posts all the
i
>
> I have the following code for order_update.php:
>
> [code]
>
> session_start();
> extract($_POST);
> foreach ($_POST as $var => $val) {
> if ($val > 0) {
> $_SESSION[$var] = $val;
> } else {
> unset($var);
>
> }
> header("Location: order_process.php");
> }
>
> [/code]
>
> This is not work
I have reported this problem in http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=49238. It
would appear that this option, which was first made available in PHP 4.2.0,
has been silently dropped. Apparently the decision was made in order to fix
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=43227, but nothing was explicitly stated
Ben,
First of all, I thank you for your time and help.
My ai with using unset($var) in update_order.php is to set the SESSION
variable for an item to ' ' (empty) so that it would not show up on the
order summary (because my writeResultRow() function will only write a row if
that variable is great
41 matches
Mail list logo
