Hello guys,
It seems most of you very tallended programmers.
Could you generate someting like
php--
withouth OO just namespaces ?
and make 95% of php programmers very happy...
this Object Orgy going to blow that language
which makes us productive programmers.
and
My vote goes to Tony...
question: Would anybody else like to see, or feel the need for, *optional*
type hinting of variables and class properties in PHP?
This would all be under the assumption and proviso that an implementation
would not break bc, have any markable perfomance hit, or in any other way
effect existing
Stuart wrote:
Also, PHP is procedural with OO capabilities due to its history
never understood this comment more - wish I'd given it more thought when
it stuck out the first time. - cheers stut
time4work!
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.ph
On 19.01.2009, at 00:00, Nathan Rixham wrote:
Jochem Maas wrote:
Nathan Rixham schreef:
Hi All,
preface: Having discussed at great length previously and probably
completely misnaming and thus misleading the conversation here
goes again.
question: Would anybody else like to see, or feel t
On Sun, 2009-01-18 at 18:10 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> Jochem Maas wrote:
> > Per Jessen schreef:
> >> Nathan Rixham wrote:
> >>
> >>> Per Jessen wrote:
> Nathan Rixham wrote:
>
> >> You can't have your cake and eat it. You can't/shouldn't have
> >> strong
> >> and loose t
On Sun, 2009-01-18 at 23:09 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> Török Alpár wrote:
> > I see a problem with this. Scalars are automatically casted by PHP based on
> > a set of rules. In case of a scalar type hint, would jo issue an error, or
> > make the automatic type cast? both approaches have ther
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
> I think that's at best an example of someone having chosen the wrong
> tool. I can easily appreciate the frustration. My own rule-of-thumb -
> scripts are for small things and rapid prototyping. Once when a script
> (regardless of language) gr
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 12:28 AM, shahrzad khorrami
wrote:
> I tested with port 25, but it didn't work.
> I confuse, I don't know what problem is
> it works well with gmail...
>
> thanks for reply :)
>
http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=13287
--
PHP General Mailing L
I have been looking but can't find which PHP list is best to post info
regarding a new PHP tool. I have seen new product/service announcements on
this list, but thought there might be a better list. Any suggestions?
Thanks in advance.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To uns
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:33 AM, wrote:
> I have been looking but can't find which PHP list is best to post info
> regarding a new PHP tool. I have seen new product/service announcements on
> this list, but thought there might be a better list. Any suggestions?
>
> Thanks in advance.
Try it and
shahrzad khorrami wrote:
hi all,
I want to send email using SMTP Authentication with PHPMailer,
I searched more and more but I can't find anything of my problem
///
include_once('class.phpmailer.php');
include("class.smtp.php
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Eric Butera wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:33 AM, wrote:
> > I have been looking but can't find which PHP list is best to post info
> > regarding a new PHP tool. I have seen new product/service announcements
> on
> > this list, but thought there might be a
Eric Butera wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
>> I think that's at best an example of someone having chosen the wrong
>> tool. I can easily appreciate the frustration. My own rule-of-thumb
>> - scripts are for small things and rapid prototyping. Once when a
>> script (
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:33, wrote:
> I have been looking but can't find which PHP list is best to post info
> regarding a new PHP tool. I have seen new product/service announcements on
> this list, but thought there might be a better list. Any suggestions?
As long as it's an announcement
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 12:25 -0500, Daniel Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:33, wrote:
> > I have been looking but can't find which PHP list is best to post info
> > regarding a new PHP tool. I have seen new product/service announcements on
> > this list, but thought there might be a bett
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Robert Cummings wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 12:25 -0500, Daniel Brown wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:33, wrote:
>> > I have been looking but can't find which PHP list is best to post info
>> > regarding a new PHP tool. I have seen new product/service an
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 12:42:31PM -0500, Robert Cummings wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 12:25 -0500, Daniel Brown wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:33, wrote:
> > > I have been looking but can't find which PHP list is best to post info
> > > regarding a new PHP tool. I have seen new product
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:36, Tony Marston
wrote:
>
> Really? In 2007 I single-handedly designed and built an ERP system with 130
> database tables, 230 relationships and 1000 screens, all with PHP and
> without an ORM and static typing. This took me 6 months. If you can't equal
> that then eithe
Daniel Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:33, wrote:
>> I have been looking but can't find which PHP list is best to post info
>> regarding a new PHP tool. I have seen new product/service announcements on
>> this list, but thought there might be a better list. Any suggestions?
>
> As
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Daniel Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:36, Tony Marston
> wrote:
> >
> > Really? In 2007 I single-handedly designed and built an ERP system with
> 130
> > database tables, 230 relationships and 1000 screens, all with PHP and
> > without an ORM and stat
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 12:13, Per Jessen wrote:
>
> Yes, I am serious, and no, I don't write php extensions etc. I don't
> write many web apps anyway. I do use PHP quite a bit for command line
> stuff, in fact for >95% of my scripts.
Same her, Per. I actually use PHP for more command-line
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 13:09 -0500, Paul M Foster wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 12:42:31PM -0500, Robert Cummings wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 12:25 -0500, Daniel Brown wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:33, wrote:
> > > > I have been looking but can't find which PHP list is best to
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 12:55 -0500, Eric Butera wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Robert Cummings
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 12:25 -0500, Daniel Brown wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:33, wrote:
> >> > I have been looking but can't find which PHP list is best to post info
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Daniel Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 12:13, Per Jessen wrote:
> >
> > Yes, I am serious, and no, I don't write php extensions etc. I don't
> > write many web apps anyway. I do use PHP quite a bit for command line
> > stuff, in fact for >95% of my scri
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 13:15, Jim Lucas wrote:
>
> Hey, are those Brownie Points calculated by "your" software? Isn't that a
> little weighted to your favor?
It's not what I initially intended when I first posted that
message, but once I read Rob's reply, I knew it was going to come up
eve
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 13:22, Kyle Terry wrote:
>>
> Aside from a few perl scripts, I have rewritten all my bash scripts in PHP.
> It's just easier to manage for me.
/me nods.
In 2001, I started rewriting a library of Perl scripts I'd been
building since 1995 (5.0.0.1), which meant rewr
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Daniel Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 13:22, Kyle Terry wrote:
> >>
> > Aside from a few perl scripts, I have rewritten all my bash scripts in
> PHP.
> > It's just easier to manage for me.
>
> /me nods.
>
>In 2001, I started rewriting a library o
""Daniel Brown"" wrote in message
news:ab5568160901191010u2d4073aas33789f0c81183...@mail.gmail.com...
> On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:36, Tony Marston
> wrote:
>>
>> Really? In 2007 I single-handedly designed and built an ERP system with
>> 130
>> database tables, 230 relationships and 1000 scree
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 10:50 -0800, Kyle Terry wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Daniel Brown wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 13:22, Kyle Terry wrote:
> > >>
> > > Aside from a few perl scripts, I have rewritten all my bash scripts in
> > PHP.
> > > It's just easier to manage for me
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Robert Cummings wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 10:50 -0800, Kyle Terry wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Daniel Brown wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 13:22, Kyle Terry wrote:
> > > >>
> > > > Aside from a few perl scripts, I have rewritten al
So sometimes I end up with issues that are so simple I should be able
to fix it but for some reason I end up asking a stupid question to
the list... So... Here goes :)
Here is the error:
Notice: Undefined index: 2 in /home/raosetc/public_html/purl/p.php on
line 19
and here is Line 19:
$
Hello,
I need that every time someone access one image file in my server, then
redirect to a php file.
I make this well with:
Redirect 301 imagefile.jpg scriptfile.php
But i need that the file scriptfile.php can only be accessed by this
redirect command.
If someone try to access directly from
After posting to this list to see if it is appropriate and getting good
feedback, I'm posting an announcement I think is very relative to this list
as I have been using PHP ever since it was a Perl script (PHP/FI) and have
been heavily influenced by it's concept and evolution when creating what
> Notice: Undefined index: 2 in /home/raosetc/public_html/purl/p.php on line
> 19
>
> and here is Line 19:
>
> $data = explode("/", $_SERVER['REQUEST_URI']);
Hi,
Are you sure it's an array? Use print_r() or var_dump() on
$_SERVER['REQUEST_URI'] on the preceding line. Just for testing, you
could d
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:28 AM, R B wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I need that every time someone access one image file in my server, then
> redirect to a php file.
>
> I make this well with:
>
> Redirect 301 imagefile.jpg scriptfile.php
>
> But i need that the file scriptfile.php can only be accessed by
Why are you guys Burning your egos here? Its not the right place.
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Kyle Terry wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Robert Cummings >wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 10:50 -0800, Kyle Terry wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Daniel Brown
>
> ...
This may be of some help. It's from the Apache website and only allows
access if the Referer header is sent by the browser and is
www.yourdomain.com, ie. Direct access is not permitted:
###
SetEnvIf Referer "^http://www.yourdomain.com"; local_referal
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Richard Heyes wrote:
> > ...
>
> This may be of some help. It's from the Apache website and only allows
> access if the Referer header is sent by the browser and is
> www.yourdomain.com, ie. Direct access is not permitted:
>
>
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 11:37 -0800, VamVan wrote:
> Why are you guys Burning your egos here? Its not the right place.
Could you explain "burning our egos"?
Cheers,
Rob.
--
http://www.interjinn.com
Application and Templating Framework for PHP
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Robert Cummings wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 11:37 -0800, VamVan wrote:
> > Why are you guys Burning your egos here? Its not the right place.
>
> Could you explain "burning our egos"?
>
> Cheers,
> Rob.
> --
> http://www.interjinn.com
> Application and Templatin
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 14:37, VamVan wrote:
> Why are you guys Burning your egos here? Its not the right place.
It's a PHP-related general discussion, Vam. Perhaps not entirely
in good manners, but it's 100% relevant. Indeed, this is the right
place.
That aside, as intelligent folks,
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 14:50 -0500, Daniel Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 14:37, VamVan wrote:
> > Why are you guys Burning your egos here? Its not the right place.
>
> It's a PHP-related general discussion, Vam. Perhaps not entirely
> in good manners, but it's 100% relevant. Indeed,
Ok, you just hijacked a thread (I think (I don't have threading
enabled)) and you top posted. You've probably burned through your
goodwill in one shot :/
Cheers,
Rob.
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 14:32 -0500, c...@wizzyweb.com wrote:
> After posting to this list to see if it is appropriate and getting
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 2:37 PM, VamVan wrote:
> Why are you guys Burning your egos here? Its not the right place.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Kyle Terry wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Robert Cummings > >wrote:
>>
>> > On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 10:50 -0800, Kyle Terry wro
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Robert Cummings wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 14:50 -0500, Daniel Brown wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 14:37, VamVan wrote:
> > > Why are you guys Burning your egos here? Its not the right place.
> >
> > It's a PHP-related general discussion, Vam. Perha
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Robert Cummings wrote:
> Ok, you just hijacked a thread (I think (I don't have threading
> enabled)) and you top posted. You've probably burned through your
> goodwill in one shot :/
>
> Cheers,
> Rob.
>
>
>
> On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 14:32 -0500, c...@wizzyweb.com wr
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Daniel Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 14:37, VamVan wrote:
> > Why are you guys Burning your egos here? Its not the right place.
>
> It's a PHP-related general discussion, Vam. Perhaps not entirely
> in good manners, but it's 100% relevant. Indeed,
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 12:05 PM, VamVan wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Daniel Brown wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 14:37, VamVan wrote:
>> > Why are you guys Burning your egos here? Its not the right place.
>>
>> It's a PHP-related general discussion, Vam. Perhaps not ent
Right, I just replied to the thread which started from my post. Glad I
didn't hijack or top-post, but thanks for the potential heads-up just the
same.
Best,
Brian
- Original Message -
From: "Eric Butera"
To: "Robert Cummings"
Cc: ; "Daniel Brown" ;
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009
Hi all,
Appologies if this is the wrong list - please direct me in the right
direction should this be the case.
I am running PHP 5.2.8 on freebsd 7.0 and am getting a Seg fault when
running one of my new programs. We run a couple of other sites of this
server (only one upgraded to 5.2.8) and they
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 12:11 PM, wrote:
> Right, I just replied to the thread which started from my post. Glad I
> didn't hijack or top-post, but thanks for the potential heads-up just the
> same.
>
> Best,
>
> Brian
> - Original Message - From: "Eric Butera"
> To: "Robert Cummings"
>
I think it means Rob has to bake us all some brownies and ship 'em out to us...
:-)
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Thanks to all. The problem is caused by a server restriction.
SourceForge.net does not allow to send emails from PHP.
Bye!
2009/1/17 Morris :
> If you are using apache + php, check php.in your server is able to support
> the mail() function and you have correctly set up the send and return
> addr
I doubt that you can use re-direct and do what you want, since a re-direct does
just that:
re-direct the USER to the URL.
What you *could* do is get rid of the re-direct and just
include('scriptfile.php'); by using ForceType on imagefile.jpg to be
application/x-httpd-php
Then scriptfile.
Zoran Bogdanov wrote:
1.When the user is successfully authenticated the login.php sends the
header, but the AJAX XMLHttpRequest call is still in progress waiting for a
PHP response. So when PHP using the header function redirects to another
page that page is outputed to the login form...
you
On Jan 19, 2009, at 2:32 PM, Richard Heyes wrote:
Notice: Undefined index: 2 in /home/raosetc/public_html/purl/p.php
on line
19
and here is Line 19:
$data = explode("/", $_SERVER['REQUEST_URI']);
Hi,
Are you sure it's an array? Use print_r() or var_dump() on
$_SERVER['REQUEST_URI'] on th
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 14:32, Richard Heyes wrote:
>> Notice: Undefined index: 2 in /home/raosetc/public_html/purl/p.php on line
>> 19
>>
>> and here is Line 19:
>>
>> $data = explode("/", $_SERVER['REQUEST_URI']);
When I view that file, on line 19, I see:
echo << Are you sure it's an array
There is no reference to index '2' in that line 19.
What is the next line?
Something which expects at least 3 elements in the URI, perhaps?...
[Hint, hint]
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Михаил Гаврилов wrote:
How serialize DOMDocument object?
describe: "serialize — Generates a storable representation of a value"
note: "It is not possible to serialize PHP built-in objects."
see: http://uk2.php.net/serialize
solve:
$s = DOMDocument->saveXML(); // serialized
DOMDocument->loadXML
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 15:19, wrote:
>
> I think it means Rob has to bake us all some brownies and ship 'em out to
> us...
> :-)
Except that it also means we know by pattern that we can't count
on him to break away from the computer long enough to do that. ;-P
--
daniel.br...@parasane.
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 15:08, Kyle Terry wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 12:05 PM, VamVan wrote:
>> I believe in Community building. My only concern was the kind of language
>> used is very intimidating , that's all.
>
> Are you referring to bad language?
An unintended pun. Nice. ;-P
--
On Jan 19, 2009, at 3:28 PM, Daniel Brown wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 14:32, Richard Heyes wrote:
Notice: Undefined index: 2 in /home/raosetc/public_html/purl/p.php
on line
19
and here is Line 19:
$data = explode("/", $_SERVER['REQUEST_URI']);
When I view that file, on line 19, I
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 15:12, Ian wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Appologies if this is the wrong list - please direct me in the right
> direction should this be the case.
>
> I am running PHP 5.2.8 on freebsd 7.0 and am getting a Seg fault when
> running one of my new programs. We run a couple of other sit
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 15:11 -0500, c...@wizzyweb.com wrote:
> Right, I just replied to the thread which started from my post. Glad I
> didn't hijack or top-post, but thanks for the potential heads-up just the
> same.
Doh, 40 lashes for me...
... and a bottle of rum to nurse!
:)
Cheers,
Rob.
-
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 20:19 +, c...@l-i-e.com wrote:
> I think it means Rob has to bake us all some brownies and ship 'em out to
> us...
> :-)
My deale^H^H^H^H^H^H^H I can't get any ingredients.
Cheers,
Rob.
--
http://www.interjinn.com
Application and Templating Framework for PHP
--
PHP
Hello,
I am interested in hearing opinions about if there
are reasons to stay with a 32bit php/apache if there
is 64bit options available. What are the pros/cons
in running in the different architectures?
(Fat Binary apache2, *nix platform)
Thanks,
Donovan
--
=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 15:39, Jason Pruim wrote:
>
> Only when you log into certain accounts and view the file after I had made
> changes :P
I figured you had already changed it, but when you're root, you
don't have to log in to other accounts. ;-P
> What I'm really going for is given this
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 15:56, dbrooke wrote:
> Hello,
> I am interested in hearing opinions about if there
> are reasons to stay with a 32bit php/apache if there
> is 64bit options available. What are the pros/cons
> in running in the different architectures?
Like running PHP/64 on CentOS5/3
I like this apache solution, but if i put
SetEnvIf Referer "^http://www.yourdomain.com"; local_referal
Then i can access the file putting this path in the URL:
http://www.yourdomain.com/xyz/scriptfile.php
And i don´t want the script to be access by the url. That is the main
problem.
Thanks
O
On Sun, 2009-01-18 at 23:03 -0500, Ron Piggott wrote:
> Is there a way to specify an already existing file to use as the
> background, instead of a specific color, such as what
> http://ca.php.net/manual/en/function.imagefill.php illustrates? Ron
Yes. But what do you want to do with it? Do you wan
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 14:56 -0600, dbrooke wrote:
> Hello,
> I am interested in hearing opinions about if there
> are reasons to stay with a 32bit php/apache if there
> is 64bit options available. What are the pros/cons
> in running in the different architectures?
>
> (Fat Binary apache2, *nix pla
On Sun, 2009-01-18 at 22:50 -0700, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
> Larry Garfield wrote:
> > http://us3.php.net/manual/en/ini.core.php#ini.register-long-arrays
> >
> Bingo. That's what I needed.
>
> > Although you should probably take the time to upgrade the app anyway, as
> > those
> > var
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 14:56 -0600, dbrooke wrote:
Hello,
I am interested in hearing opinions about if there
are reasons to stay with a 32bit php/apache if there
is 64bit options available. What are the pros/cons
in running in the different architectures?
(Fat Binary apach
well just for the hell of it; and because I'm feeling worn..
anybody else find the following true when you're a developer?
- frequent bursts of side-tracking onto more interesting subjects
- vast amount of inhuman focus, followed by inability to remain focussed
- general tendancy to keep taking
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 15:18 -0600, dbrooke wrote:
> Robert Cummings wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 14:56 -0600, dbrooke wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >> I am interested in hearing opinions about if there
> >> are reasons to stay with a 32bit php/apache if there
> >> is 64bit options available. What are th
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 15:18 -0600, dbrooke wrote:
> Robert Cummings wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 14:56 -0600, dbrooke wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >> I am interested in hearing opinions about if there
> >> are reasons to stay with a 32bit php/apache if there
> >> is 64bit options available. What are th
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> well just for the hell of it; and because I'm feeling worn..
>
> anybody else find the following true when you're a developer?
>
> - frequent bursts of side-tracking onto more interesting subjects
> - vast amount of inhuman focus, followed b
Hey,
I'm thinking about implementing Subversion to an existing php project for
obvious reasons.
But I have some trouble when thinking about the usage.
Situation is:
There are already 2 servers. One running the "live/productive" version and
one for developing new features. Until now it works like:
Sergio Jovani wrote:
Thanks to all. The problem is caused by a server restriction.
SourceForge.net does not allow to send emails from PHP.
Bye!
2009/1/17 Morris :
If you are using apache + php, check php.in your server is able to support
the mail() function and you have correctly set up the
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:28 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> well just for the hell of it; and because I'm feeling worn..
>
> anybody else find the following true when you're a developer?
>
> - frequent bursts of side-tracking onto more interesting subjects
> - vast amount of inhuman focus, followed
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:28 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> well just for the hell of it; and because I'm feeling worn..
>
> anybody else find the following true when you're a developer?
>
> - frequent bursts of side-tracking onto more interesting subjects
yes, but it tends to be side-tracking to w
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Kyle Terry wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Nathan Rixham wrote:
well just for the hell of it; and because I'm feeling worn..
anybody else find the following true when you're a developer?
- frequent bursts of side-tracking onto more interesting subjects
- vast
Nathan Rixham wrote:
well just for the hell of it; and because I'm feeling worn..
anybody else find the following true when you're a developer?
- frequent bursts of side-tracking onto more interesting subjects
- vast amount of inhuman focus, followed by inability to remain focussed
- general t
2009/1/19 R B
> I like this apache solution, but if i put
>
> SetEnvIf Referer "^http://www.yourdomain.com"; local_referal
>
> Then i can access the file putting this path in the URL:
>
> http://www.yourdomain.com/xyz/scriptfile.php
> And i don´t want the script to be access by the url. That is
Edmund Hertle wrote:
Hey,
I'm thinking about implementing Subversion to an existing php project for
obvious reasons.
But I have some trouble when thinking about the usage.
there are lots of ways of using svn and I'm sure you'll get different
opinions.. personally I always create a script to d
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Afan Pasalic wrote:
>
> Nathan Rixham wrote:
>
>> well just for the hell of it; and because I'm feeling worn..
>>
>> anybody else find the following true when you're a developer?
>>
>> - frequent bursts of side-tracking onto more interesting subjects
>> - vast amo
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:28 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
well just for the hell of it; and because I'm feeling worn..
anybody else find the following true when you're a developer?
- frequent bursts of side-tracking onto more interesting subjects
- v
I'm not alone then (didn't think so :p)
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:28 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
well just for the hell of it; and because I'm feeling worn..
anybody else find the following true when you're a developer?
- frequent bursts of side-tracking onto more intere
2009/1/19 Ashley Sheridan
> On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:28 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> > well just for the hell of it; and because I'm feeling worn..
> >
> > anybody else find the following true when you're a developer?
> >
> > - frequent bursts of side-tracking onto more interesting subjects
> ye
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:28 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
well just for the hell of it; and because I'm feeling worn..
anybody else find the following true when you're a developer?
- frequent bursts of side-tracking onto more interesting subjects
- vast amount of inhuman f
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:46 +, Luke Slater wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Robert Cummings wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:28 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> >> well just for the hell of it; and because I'm feeling worn..
> >>
> >> anybody else find the following true when you're a developer
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:53 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> Robert Cummings wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:28 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> >> well just for the hell of it; and because I'm feeling worn..
> >>
> >> anybody else find the following true when you're a developer?
> >>
> >> - frequent
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:53 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:28 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
well just for the hell of it; and because I'm feeling worn..
anybody else find the following true when you're a develope
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> well just for the hell of it; and because I'm feeling worn..
>
> anybody else find the following true when you're a developer?
>
> - frequent bursts of side-tracking onto more interesting subjects
of course
>
> - vast amount of inhuman f
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:53 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:28 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
well just for the hell of it; and because I'm feeling worn..
anybody else find the following true when you're a develope
Robert Cummings wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 12:25 -0500, Daniel Brown wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:33, wrote:
>>> I have been looking but can't find which PHP list is best to post info
>>> regarding a new PHP tool. I have seen new product/service announcements on
>>> this list, but tho
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:53 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> Robert Cummings wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:28 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> >> well just for the hell of it; and because I'm feeling worn..
> >>
> >> anybody else find the following true when you're a developer?
> >>
> >> - frequent
Bastien Koert wrote:
always, flex & php at the moment
ahh great to read, flex is amazing, the best product to hit the
developers market in years IMHO, coupled with XMPP (say openfire) it's
great as well - there's something about flex and xmpp.. say if you were
to implement a kind of http ove
c...@l-i-e.com wrote:
ESTJ
Apparently, it's time for me to take on a project manager job and quit coding...
Oddly enough, I've been thinking I might like to do that, though more of an
architect/manager role, really...
didn't you already make that change when you became ceo of an
intergala
2009/1/19 Nathan Rixham
>
> well the idea of svn is that should you find a problem you either rollback
> the file(s) to the good version (not rollback the whole site) or you commit
> updated files with the fix, then redeploy. No need to branch or such like.
>
Well, yes, of course there also will b
1 - 100 of 178 matches
Mail list logo
