Nathan Rixham wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 21:36 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 16:02 -0500, tedd wrote:
True, css does not allow numeric classes (like sessions). But, I
never need them anyway.
As I provided before
"Ashley Sheridan" wrote in message
news:1231796437.3558.62.ca...@localhost.localdomain...
> On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 16:11 -0500, Frank Stanovcak wrote:
>> I posted this once before, and then tried to use it multiple times in a
>> script. As you can guess I got a bunch of func already defined error
At 3:32 PM -0500 1/12/09, Robert Cummings wrote:
One has to wonder about the readability of the case version though since
one may not notice immediately the missing break statement.
Cheers,
Rob.
Yes, but that's because of the way you wrote it -- consider this:
If you group the case's togeth
At 4:17 PM -0500 1/12/09, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 16:02 -0500, tedd wrote:
True, css does not allow numeric classes (like sessions). But, I
never need them anyway.
As I provided before:
http://webbytedd.com/b/color-rows/
this is my solution for alternating row style
At 9:37 PM + 1/12/09, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 16:17 -0500, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 16:02 -0500, tedd wrote:
>
> True, css does not allow numeric classes (like sessions). But, I
> never need them anyway.
>
> As I provided before:
>
> http://we
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 16:54 -0500, tedd wrote:
> At 9:37 PM + 1/12/09, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> >On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 16:17 -0500, Robert Cummings wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 16:02 -0500, tedd wrote:
> >> >
> >> > True, css does not allow numeric classes (like sessions). But, I
> >>
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 16:49 -0500, tedd wrote:
> At 3:32 PM -0500 1/12/09, Robert Cummings wrote:
> >One has to wonder about the readability of the case version though since
> >one may not notice immediately the missing break statement.
> >
> >Cheers,
> >Rob.
>
> Yes, but that's because of the way
tedd wrote:
At 3:32 PM -0500 1/12/09, Robert Cummings wrote:
One has to wonder about the readability of the case version though since
one may not notice immediately the missing break statement.
Cheers,
Rob.
Yes, but that's because of the way you wrote it -- consider this:
I'm sure that was
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 16:51 -0500, tedd wrote:
> At 4:17 PM -0500 1/12/09, Robert Cummings wrote:
> >On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 16:02 -0500, tedd wrote:
> >>
> >> True, css does not allow numeric classes (like sessions). But, I
> >> never need them anyway.
> >>
> >> As I provided before:
> >>
> >> h
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 16:49 -0500, tedd wrote:
> At 3:32 PM -0500 1/12/09, Robert Cummings wrote:
> >One has to wonder about the readability of the case version though since
> >one may not notice immediately the missing break statement.
> >
> >Cheers,
> >Rob.
>
> Yes, but that's because of the way
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 16:54 -0500, tedd wrote:
> At 9:37 PM + 1/12/09, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> >On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 16:17 -0500, Robert Cummings wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 16:02 -0500, tedd wrote:
> >> >
> >> > True, css does not allow numeric classes (like sessions). But, I
> >>
Frank Stanovcak wrote:
I posted this once before, and then tried to use it multiple times in a
script. As you can guess I got a bunch of func already defined errors.
Here is a revision incase anyone decided to use it that will work multiple
times in the same script for variable watching.
--
"Chris" wrote in message
news:496bbd52.2080...@gmail.com...
> Frank Stanovcak wrote:
>> I posted this once before, and then tried to use it multiple times in a
>> script. As you can guess I got a bunch of func already defined errors.
>>
>> Here is a revision incase anyone decided to use it that
At 4:57 PM -0500 1/12/09, Robert Cummings wrote:
No, that's DIFFERENT from what I wrote. Go back and re-read.
:)
I did and reread again -- it looks different. I'm simply talking
about the spacing.
No matter though, it's the same code.
Cheers,
tedd
--
---
http://sperling.com http://
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 17:09 -0500, tedd wrote:
> At 4:57 PM -0500 1/12/09, Robert Cummings wrote:
> >No, that's DIFFERENT from what I wrote. Go back and re-read.
> >
> >:)
>
> I did and reread again -- it looks different. I'm simply talking
> about the spacing.
>
> No matter though, it's the sam
Hello everybody,
I want to upgrade my system and do face some trouble with pdflib.
compile says:
Notice: Following unknown configure options were used:
--enable-gd-imgstrttf
--with-pdflib
I guess the gd functionality is enabled now anyway? How about the
pdflib? Is there another command for t
Merlin Morgenstern wrote:
Hello everybody,
I want to upgrade my system and do face some trouble with pdflib.
compile says:
Notice: Following unknown configure options were used:
--enable-gd-imgstrttf
--with-pdflib
I guess the gd functionality is enabled now anyway? How about the
pdflib? Is
I'm trying to redirect my users to a URL which includes a query string:
$the_url =
$CFG->wwwroot."/DLC/includes/L1_accept_required.php?cid=".$course->id;
//die ("URL = $the_url");
header('Location: '. $the_url);
When I uncomment the die() command, the URL shows properly, e
Hello everybody,
I am trying to update php 5.2.6 to 5.2.8 on a test system. Somehow it
can not find the working mysql installation. With 5.2.6 I everything is
fine.
Here is the configure command that is pretty much the same as in 5.2.6:
'./configure' '--enable-fastcgi' '--with-mysql'
'--pre
Here is the configure command that is pretty much the same as in 5.2.6:
So look at the differences ;)
'./configure' '--enable-fastcgi' '--with-mysql'
'--prefix=/usr/local/php' '--with-apxs2=/usr/local/apache2/bin/apxs'
'--enable-mbstring' '--with-pdo-mysql=/usr/local/mysql/'
'--with-mysql-
No. The with-pdo-mysql command secures compatibility with oder databases
. That workes fine. The yes in the error msg. seams to be normal in this
case. I found loads of such via google. e.g:
http://www.rootforum.de/forum/viewtopic.php?f=158&t=35941&start=0
All point to the fact that there needs
At 5:12 PM -0500 1/12/09, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 17:09 -0500, tedd wrote:
At 4:57 PM -0500 1/12/09, Robert Cummings wrote:
>No, that's DIFFERENT from what I wrote. Go back and re-read.
>
>:)
I did and reread again -- it looks different. I'm simply talking
about the s
I must be retarded or something because I can't figure out in Eclipse
PDT (Linux) how in the heck do I start a new project and have it "point"
to an existing directory tree.
I DO NOT want Eclipse to pull in a copy of the files or do anything
wacky like that. I simply want it to look at a mount poi
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Daevid Vincent wrote:
> I must be retarded or something because I can't figure out in Eclipse
> PDT (Linux) how in the heck do I start a new project and have it "point"
> to an existing directory tree.
>
> I DO NOT want Eclipse to pull in a copy of the files or do
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 09:56:00PM +, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
>
> Here's something for fixing IE with hacks:
>
> http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk/coding_html_comments.php
>
> basically it lets you add in extra IE-only stylesheets using comment
> code only recognised by IE, and you can use !
On Jan 12, 2009, at 2:16 PM, Nathan Rixham wrote:
Jason Pruim wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I know it's not a php question... But I know alot of you use
rewrite rules and regular expressions and so I thought maybe you
would be able to help me.
The site: HTTP://purl.raoset.com/test112
test112 doesn'
Firstly, not really a php question, but generic web stuff, but I feel it's
still better answered here.
Recently a friend came to me asking to create an ecommerce website. In the
past my php work has been primarily a hobby, and as such haven't really
taken much interest or effort into security
101 - 127 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
