On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 13:18 -0500, Andrew Ballard wrote:
> Seriously? All e-mail? Sorry - couldn't resist. That is one serious
> disclaimer. I especially like the last line.
>
Holy crap! I had never actually looked at that stupid disclaimer before!
It gets added on the way out of our network, s
At 12:45 PM -0500 2/27/08, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
if i were going to design a system consisting largely of functions, i would
use the same practice i use for designing classes; each function would be
concise. that is, if functions became large, eg over 20 - 30 lines
One of the things I've noticed
On 2/27/08, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> RoR is a framework, not a language.
Really? I had not heard that previously.
--
Greg Donald
http://destiney.com/
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> RoR is a framework, not a language. I also save crapload of typing by
> using my InterJinn framework. Ruby as a language doesn't float my boat.
where were you in the big ruby stand-off a couple weeks back ? :D
-nathan
At 10:56 AM -0800 2/27/08, Richard S. Crawford wrote:
For my own amusement, I'm writing a function that will print out detailed
error messages for an API that I'm creating for a minor project. One of the
pieces of information I'd like to return would be the name of the function
that called the e
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 2:17 PM, tedd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 12:45 PM -0500 2/27/08, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
> >if i were going to design a system consisting largely of functions, i
> would
> >use the same practice i use for designing classes; each function would be
> >concise. that is, if f
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Greg Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/27/08, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > RoR is a framework, not a language.
>
> Really? I had not heard that previously.
ya; rob; greg is like the new dude on the witty block;
better pack something good
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 13:18 -0500, Andrew Ballard wrote:
>
> > Seriously? All e-mail? Sorry - couldn't resist. That is one serious
> > disclaimer. I especially like the last line.
> >
>
> Holy crap! I had never actually
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Philip Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> The PHP manual FAQ has not received much attention over these past
> few years, so it's outdated. This needs to be fixed.
>
> If you would like to add questions (and ideally, with answers) to the
> FA
OK. I just went through about 10 minutes' worth of cachegrinds,
including several httperf tests on that empty php file (which had the
usual poor results). According to the cachegrind files, nothing
(including the other active web pages) took more than 15ms and the
empty php file never excee
Nathan Nobbe wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
RoR is a framework, not a language. I also save crapload of typing by
using my InterJinn framework. Ruby as a language doesn't float my boat.
where were you in the big ruby stand-off a couple week
On 2/27/08, Nathan Nobbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ya; rob; greg is like the new dude on the witty block;
> better pack something good for a comeback :O
> my heads still smoking while i try to think up something
> moderately so ~:(
I'm not gonna just sit here and watch someone "*lol*" comparin
Psh, if you're going to talk about RoR, might as well talk about PoP...
Python on Planes!
http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/04/01/176239
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Nathan Nobbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Greg Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
On 2/27/08, Matty Sarro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Psh, if you're going to talk about RoR, might as well talk about PoP...
> Python on Planes!
> http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/04/01/176239
Yeah, I love me some good April Fool's jokes, especially the 4 year old variety.
--
Gr
Greetings all!
I am still relatively new to any kind of web design or php programming, I'll
be completely honest. I am used to working with C, Perl, Java, and a splash
of C++. PHP and web application development are kind of a new bag for me and
I'm still trying to get my bearings. I see that design
Well, I just spent more time messing with httpd's conf and it the
problem seems to have resolved itself by turning off hostname lookups.
I know there's overhead associated with it, but I don't really
understand why it only affected PHP, and so drastically. At any rate,
I guess this issue is
Well, I was going to ignore this comment, but given the smart-alecky nature
I have to comment that the post date is April 1st 2007. Today is February
27th, 2008. Not only is that not 4 years, but its less than 365 days. You
may want to brush up on your math skills my friend. And your humor skills a
On 27 Feb 2008, at 18:36, David Giragosian wrote:
The comparisons are fairly biased against PHP, as expected from the
source, and a number of links are broken, particularly the one
offering 5 full applications with source code. But I do have an
install of the full Visual Studio .NET, and althou
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 14:19 -0500, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > RoR is a framework, not a language. I also save crapload of typing by
> > using my InterJinn framework. Ruby as a language doesn't float my boat.
>
>
> wh
On 27 Feb 2008, at 19:50, Matty Sarro wrote:
I am still relatively new to any kind of web design or php
programming, I'll
be completely honest. I am used to working with C, Perl, Java, and a
splash
of C++. PHP and web application development are kind of a new bag
for me and
I'm still trying
On 2/27/08, Stut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 27 Feb 2008, at 18:36, David Giragosian wrote:
> > The comparisons are fairly biased against PHP, as expected from the
> > source, and a number of links are broken, particularly the one
> > offering 5 full applications with source code. But I do ha
Well, let's see.. IMO you should try:
[1] HTML: Before anything, you should study the fundamental tags (html,
table, div) and some about DOM (this helps w/ XML also).
[2] PHP: Using php to build the results for html, embedding php in html,
forms, etc
[3] SQL: Storing data is essential, try using P
Hello!
Just a quick question... can anyone recommend a php app like digg _that you
have used or know of well_?
Does not seem too hard to make but if theres something like that already out
there, wouldnt mind modifying it to my needs.
TIA
Cheers!
Ryan
_
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Adriano Manocchia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK. I just went through about 10 minutes' worth of cachegrinds,
> including several httperf tests on that empty php file (which had the
> usual poor results). According to the cachegrind files, nothing
> (including t
To the extent of my knowledge ASP is simply the server-side scripting
engine, and most of the programming is actually done in visual basic, or any
other scripting language you decide to use so long as its somehow putting
money in microsoft's pocket. Think along the lines of Perl (the interpreter)
v
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Richard S. Crawford
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For my own amusement, I'm writing a function that will print out detailed
> error messages for an API that I'm creating for a minor project. One of the
> pieces of information I'd like to return would be the name o
> I thought ASP was the language and .NET was the framework.
I was under this impression as well.. I always equated .NET to ASP the same
way I would ZEND to PHP...
--
Stephen Johnson c | eh
The Lone Coder
http://www.thelonecoder.com
continuing the struggle against bad code
http://www.forthelo
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 3:06 PM, Ryan A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Just a quick question... can anyone recommend a php app like digg _that you
> have used or know of well_?
> Does not seem too hard to make but if theres something like that already out
> there, wouldnt mind modifyin
On 2/27/08, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So is ASP really a framework? Did I get that wrong... I'm not always
> right you know, especially about MS crap.
>
>From the first mentioned article:
ASP.NET is part of the Microsoft .NET Framework. The .NET Framework is
a feature of Wind
On 2/27/08, Matty Sarro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, I was going to ignore this comment, but given the smart-alecky nature
> I have to comment that the post date is April 1st 2007. Today is February
> 27th, 2008. Not only is that not 4 years, but its less than 365 days. You
> may want to brus
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Adriano Manocchia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, I just spent more time messing with httpd's conf and it the
> problem seems to have resolved itself by turning off hostname lookups.
> I know there's overhead associated with it, but I don't really
> understand
[snip]
> I thought ASP was the language and .NET was the framework.
I was under this impression as well.. I always equated .NET to ASP the
same
way I would ZEND to PHP...
[/snip]
Think of ASP like you would JBoss or Tomcat - it is an application
server. Most folks used VBScript as the language b
On 2/27/08, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So is ASP really a framework?
.Net has upwards of 70K classes. If that's not a framework then I
dunno what is.
--
Greg Donald
http://destiney.com/
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Stut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe it's just me but I usually end up rewriting everything I write
> at least twice. That's just a fact of life and I've found that I end
> up with far better code that way than I do by trying to get it right
> first time. It
At 10:03 AM -0800 2/27/08, Dare Williams wrote:
Dear Developers,
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa479002.aspx
I read an Article on the above Microsoft website stating the
reason why to Migrate from PHP to ASP.NET. So can you please justify
this proofs from Microsoft and let every
I understand and agree completely, and I really appreciate the help. My goal
isn't so much to keep from re-writing code, but to have a pretty firm
foundation to stand on before I really begin. I mean, with c++ or c, all I
needed was the language, and that was pretty much it. I could do everything
f
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 14:29 -0600, Greg Donald wrote:
> On 2/27/08, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So is ASP really a framework?
>
> .Net has upwards of 70K classes. If that's not a framework then I
> dunno what is.
No need to keep confusing me... I got better answers form othe
Completely off subject, but man I miss quickbasic... that was such a fun
language to program in way back-in-the-day. So simple!
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 3:39 PM, tedd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 10:03 AM -0800 2/27/08, Dare Williams wrote:
> >Dear Developers,
> >
> > http://msdn2.microsoft.c
Matty Sarro wrote:
I understand and agree completely, and I really appreciate the help. My goal
isn't so much to keep from re-writing code, but to have a pretty firm
foundation to stand on before I really begin. I mean, with c++ or c, all I
needed was the language, and that was pretty much it. I
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 13:41 -0600, Greg Donald wrote:
> On 2/27/08, Nathan Nobbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ya; rob; greg is like the new dude on the witty block;
> > better pack something good for a comeback :O
> > my heads still smoking while i try to think up something
> > moderately so ~:
Adriano Manocchia wrote:
> Well, I just spent more time messing with httpd's conf and it the
> problem seems to have resolved itself by turning off hostname lookups. I
> know there's overhead associated with it, but I don't really understand
> why it only affected PHP, and so drastically. At any ra
Richard S. Crawford wrote:
> For my own amusement, I'm writing a function that will print out detailed
> error messages for an API that I'm creating for a minor project. One of the
> pieces of information I'd like to return would be the name of the function
> that called the error function. For ex
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Matty Sarro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I understand and agree completely, and I really appreciate the help. My goal
> isn't so much to keep from re-writing code, but to have a pretty firm
> foundation to stand on before I really begin. I mean, with c++ or c, all I
At 3:32 PM -0500 2/27/08, Daniel Brown wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Stut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Maybe it's just me but I usually end up rewriting everything I write
at least twice. That's just a fact of life and I've found that I end
up with far better code that way than I d
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Daniel Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote a lot of crap.
P.S. - Sorry for the rant. ;-P
--
Daniel P. Brown
Senior Unix Geek
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 15:59 -0500, Daniel Brown wrote:
>
> * Shell scripting (BASh, tcl, Expect, AppleScript, Korn, and so forth)
Do many people still use Expect? I thought I might be a dying breed.
Cheers,
Rob.
--
..
| InterJin
Matty Sarro wrote:
I understand and agree completely, and I really appreciate the help. My goal
isn't so much to keep from re-writing code, but to have a pretty firm
foundation to stand on before I really begin. I mean, with c++ or c, all I
needed was the language, and that was pretty much it. I
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 4:04 PM, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 15:59 -0500, Daniel Brown wrote:
> >
> > * Shell scripting (BASh, tcl, Expect, AppleScript, Korn, and so
> forth)
>
> Do many people still use Expect? I thought I might be a dying breed.
At 3:46 PM -0500 2/27/08, Matty Sarro wrote:
Completely off subject, but man I miss quickbasic... that was such a
fun language to program in way back-in-the-day. So simple!
Well, the subject line did ask for "Truthful" and when it comes to
M$, what I had to say was directed at M$'s credibility
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Matty Sarro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Completely off subject, but man I miss quickbasic... that was such a fun
> language to program in way back-in-the-day. So simple!
Not to mention the ability to add (at the time) decent graphics to
an application as oppo
I'm sure this is really easy to accomplish, but I just can't seem to figure
it out. I have the following:
$str = "
mary had a little lamb
it's fleece was white as snow
and everywhere that mary went
the lamb was sure to go";
Using ucfirst($str) will only capitalize the first letter of the string
Richard Heyes schreef:
What design patterns do you usually use?
Whatever solves the problem. Factory is quite a common one. MVC is another.
anyone considered that 'function' and 'class' (given that we seem to
be flogging the old OOP v. Functions horse) are both design patterns if you
look at
Daniel Brown schreef:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 12:10 PM, tedd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sure, I understand that if you want to swap databases (MySQL to
whatever) having a abstract layer makes it easier. But, it don't make
it easier for me in the short term.
Or create a simple non-OOP db
> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:28:30 -0600> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL
> PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: php-general@lists.php.net> Subject: RE:
> [PHP] Are these Truthful Proof about PHP ??> > [snip]> > I thought ASP was
> the language and .NET was the framework.> > I was under this i
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Keikonium <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip!]
> I was thinking something like splitting each new line into a separate
> string, capitalizing the first letter with ucfirst(), and then merging the
> string back together might work, but I am not sure how to find a ne
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 16:13 -0500, Keikonium wrote:
> I'm sure this is really easy to accomplish, but I just can't seem to figure
> it out. I have the following:
>
> $str = "
> mary had a little lamb
> it's fleece was white as snow
> and everywhere that mary went
> the lamb was sure to go";
C
Its not bleeding edge unless it's web2.0 ;)
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 4:22 PM, Bastien Koert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> > Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:28:30 -0600> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC:
> php-general@lists.php.net> Subject: RE: [PHP] Are these Tru
Nah, I try to keep the 2.0 subtle, where its just cool...some others here use
it as a shotgun to kill the fly...just to say the product does it...
bastien
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:26:01 -0500From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL
PROTECTED]: Re: [PHP] Are these Truthful Proof about PHP ??CC: [EMAI
On Feb 27, 2008, at 4:26 PM, Matty Sarro wrote:
Its not bleeding edge unless it's web2.0 ;)
I actually just found out the other day from tedd that he's already
writing in web3.0... So it's time to catch up!
--
Jason Pruim
Raoset Inc.
Technology Manager
MQC Specialist
3251 132nd ave
Holl
Whoa. No need to get snippy. I was being sincere in my gratitude for
the suggestions. If nothing else, I'm sure I'll be making more use of
Xdebug in the future.
On Feb 27, 2008, at 3:55 PM, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
Adriano Manocchia wrote:
Well, I just spent more time messing with httpd's con
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Jochem Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Daniel Brown schreef:
> > Most of my code is like public school on a Sunday or that one
> > uncle that no one in the family likes to acknowledge: no class.
>
> that explains your taste in dresses :-)
Bite my shiny
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 16:24 -0500, Robert Cummings wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 16:13 -0500, Keikonium wrote:
> > I'm sure this is really easy to accomplish, but I just can't seem to figure
> > it out. I have the following:
> >
> > $str = "
> > mary had a little lamb
> > it's fleece was white
This is AWESOME!... I am so saving this post for my next Review...
Couldn't have said it better Dan...
--
Stephen Johnson c | eh
The Lone Coder
http://www.thelonecoder.com
continuing the struggle against bad code
http://www.fortheloveofgeeks.com
I¹m a geek and I¹m OK!
--
> From: Daniel Brown
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Jason Pruim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Feb 27, 2008, at 4:26 PM, Matty Sarro wrote:
>
> > Its not bleeding edge unless it's web2.0 ;)
>
> I actually just found out the other day from tedd that he's already
> writing in web3.0... So it's time to catch up!
Daniel Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Matty Sarro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Completely off subject, but man I miss quickbasic... that was such a fun
>> language to program in way back-in-the-day. So simple!
>
> Not to mention the ability to add (at the time) decent graphi
At 3:59 PM -0500 2/27/08, Daniel Brown wrote:
It is. And in my opinion, web developers - specifically
PHP-on-*nix developers - are cream-of-the-crop programmers. Not to
toot my own horn.
Blattt... fllit.
We know - and are not afraid to use - the following technologies,
and employ
On 27 Feb 2008, at 20:59, Daniel Brown wrote:
So let this be at least a basic retort to those who don't consider
web development "real programming." Because you'd be surprised how
much I hear, "oh, you work with web stuff, I thought you meant you
were a real programmer."
Well, I'm not. I
Thank you again Robert, and thank you too Daniel. I have gotten both methods
to work flawlessly so far :). I am slowly learning by trial and error here,
but sometimes a little push in the right direction does some good ^_^.
Thanks again :).
"Robert Cummings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in messag
Doh, sorry... I was jokingly replying to:
"I was going to suggest that it was most likely an Apache or DNS
issue as opposed to PHP, but after I realized I missed that your "php
tests were run on a single-line PHP script that simply echoed 'hi' so
it couldn't get much simpler than that," I figured
Adriano Manocchia wrote:
Whoa. No need to get snippy. I was being sincere in my gratitude for the
suggestions. If nothing else, I'm sure I'll be making more use of Xdebug
in the future.
On Feb 27, 2008, at 3:55 PM, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
Adriano Manocchia wrote:
Well, I just spent more time
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 4:38 PM, Stut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip!]
> If anyone considers themselves a software engineer
> rather than a web developer and would like a job in
> Windsor drop me a note.
Depending on how desperate you get, should you design to nix (no
pun intended) the o
At 4:29 PM -0500 2/27/08, Jason Pruim wrote:
On Feb 27, 2008, at 4:26 PM, Matty Sarro wrote:
Its not bleeding edge unless it's web2.0 ;)
I actually just found out the other day from tedd that he's already
writing in web3.0... So it's time to catch up!
Yeah, but don't follow me down that ro
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 4:34 PM, tedd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would include DOM scripting and understanding what the current buzz
> words mean (i.e., graceful degradation, unobtrusive code, accessible,
> functional, secure, and compliant).
I was going to include "terminology" as a li
@4u skrev:
Hi,
You might consider D-BUS for your application and the D-BUS PHP binding
which is available since some days too. This would allow you to start /
stop your C application in a far more secure way than the suggested one.
Please have a look at my original release annoucement at the D-
Stut wrote:
> On 27 Feb 2008, at 20:59, Daniel Brown wrote:
>>So let this be at least a basic retort to those who don't consider
>> web development "real programming." Because you'd be surprised how
>> much I hear, "oh, you work with web stuff, I thought you meant you
>> were a real programmer
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Adriano Manocchia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Whoa. No need to get snippy. I was being sincere in my gratitude for
> the suggestions. If nothing else, I'm sure I'll be making more use of
> Xdebug in the future.
I'm not being snippy at all. I was admitting m
Shawn McKenzie wrote:
> Stut wrote:
>> On 27 Feb 2008, at 20:59, Daniel Brown wrote:
>>>So let this be at least a basic retort to those who don't consider
>>> web development "real programming." Because you'd be surprised how
>>> much I hear, "oh, you work with web stuff, I thought you meant y
On 27 Feb 2008, at 21:42, Daniel Brown wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 4:38 PM, Stut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip!]
If anyone considers themselves a software engineer
rather than a web developer and would like a job in
Windsor drop me a note.
Depending on how desperate you get, should y
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Shawn McKenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Daniel Brown wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Matty Sarro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Completely off subject, but man I miss quickbasic... that was such a fun
> >> language to program in way back-in-the-
So I was supposed to go home a half hour ago but that didn't happen...
I hate deadlines! :P
Can someone tell me why this code works for setting the table name:
function authentication($user, $pass, $authenticated, $table){
// Keep in mind, PASSW
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thought ASP was the language and .NET was the framework.
Not exactly. .NET is the framework, but ASP is not a language. The
most common languages for .NET development are usually Visual Basic
and C#. However, lots of
Daniel Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Shawn McKenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Daniel Brown wrote:
>> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Matty Sarro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> Completely off subject, but man I miss quickbasic... that was such a fun
>> >> language to p
On Feb 27, 2008, at 4:38 PM, Stut wrote:
On 27 Feb 2008, at 20:59, Daniel Brown wrote:
So let this be at least a basic retort to those who don't consider
web development "real programming." Because you'd be surprised how
much I hear, "oh, you work with web stuff, I thought you meant you
wer
Shawn McKenzie wrote:
> Daniel Brown wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Shawn McKenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Daniel Brown wrote:
>>> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Matty Sarro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> >> Completely off subject, but man I miss quickbasic... that was such
On 27/02/2008, Zoltán Németh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> sorry that's messed up a bit, as I typed it right here in my mailer ;)
>
> preg_replace('/\b([^\s]+)a\b.*/U', '$1A', 'whatever i want that hasa a
> on the end');
>
> greets
>
> Zoltán Németh
>
Thank you very much, Zoltan. Is there a kn
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 16:38 -0500, Keikonium wrote:
> Thank you again Robert, and thank you too Daniel. I have gotten both methods
> to work flawlessly so far :). I am slowly learning by trial and error here,
> but sometimes a little push in the right direction does some good ^_^.
Nothing again
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 4:55 PM, Andrew Ballard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The plus side is that you
> can include modules written in different languages into the same
> project.
that was actually really cool when i first looked at it.
nowadays there are tons of projects where scripting
langua
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 15:48 -0600, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
> Stut wrote:
> > On 27 Feb 2008, at 20:59, Daniel Brown wrote:
> >>So let this be at least a basic retort to those who don't consider
> >> web development "real programming." Because you'd be surprised how
> >> much I hear, "oh, you wo
Jason Pruim wrote:
So I was supposed to go home a half hour ago but that didn't happen... I
hate deadlines! :P
Can someone tell me why this code works for setting the table name:
function authentication($user, $pass, $authenticated, $table){
// Keep in mind, PASSWORD ha
Per Jessen skrev:
David Sveningsson wrote:
Hi, I've written an application in c which I would like to start/stop
as a daemon in gnu/linux.
The application has the argument "--daemon" which forks the process
and exits the parent. Then it setups a SIGQUIT signal handler to
properly cleanup and t
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 4:55 PM, Jason Pruim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I was supposed to go home a half hour ago but that didn't happen...
> I hate deadlines! :P
You whine like a mule.
[snip!]
> function authentication($user, $pass, $authenticated, $table){
>
>
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 4:55 PM, Jason Pruim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I was supposed to go home a half hour ago but that didn't happen...
> I hate deadlines! :P
>
> Can someone tell me why this code works for setting the table name:
>
> function authentication($user, $pass, $authenticated
Talk about a thread hijack... LOL
In my day we had to write basic going up hill in the snow... Both ways...
--
Stephen Johnson c | eh
The Lone Coder
http://www.thelonecoder.com
continuing the struggle against bad code
http://www.fortheloveofgeeks.com
I¹m a geek and I¹m OK!
--
> From: Shaw
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Shawn McKenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually, if I recall correctly, I normally had to start with increments
> of 100.
I always started with 10 and incremented by 10 in both MS and GW
BASIC (and on TI, C64, LASER, etc.), because then I could go back a
On Feb 27, 2008, at 5:12 PM, Daniel Brown wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 4:55 PM, Jason Pruim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
So I was supposed to go home a half hour ago but that didn't
happen...
I hate deadlines! :P
You whine like a mule.
I know... But I get good answers when I do :P
On 27 Feb 2008, at 21:50, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
Shawn McKenzie wrote:
Stut wrote:
I've interviewed more than my fair share of "web developers" who
couldn't reverse an array without using array_reverse if their life
depended on it. Sometimes it really does scare me!
So my experience is that the
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Jason Pruim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I (Dan Brown) wrote this stuff:
> >As soon as a function reaches a `return` statement, it returns
> > that data and exits, so the second `return` is never processed.
>
> so the "return $table;" line doesn't ever get p
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 16:38 -0500, Keikonium wrote:
> > Thank you again Robert, and thank you too Daniel. I have gotten both
> methods
> > to work flawlessly so far :). I am slowly learning by trial and error here,
Jason Pruim wrote:
On Feb 27, 2008, at 5:12 PM, Daniel Brown wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 4:55 PM, Jason Pruim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So I was supposed to go home a half hour ago but that didn't happen...
I hate deadlines! :P
You whine like a mule.
I know... But I get good answer
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Daniel Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Shawn McKenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Actually, if I recall correctly, I normally had to start with
> increments
> > of 100.
>
> I always started with 10 and incremented by 1
101 - 200 of 255 matches
Mail list logo
