2008. 01. 30, szerda keltezéssel 13.01-kor Greg Donald ezt írta:
> On Jan 30, 2008 12:15 PM, Zoltán Németh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > It's opinionated software and is certainly not for everyone.
> >
> > ok it's not for everyone, certainly not for me. but what is it from your
> > point of view
2008. 01. 30, szerda keltezéssel 13.33-kor Greg Donald ezt írta:
> On Jan 30, 2008 12:40 PM, Nathan Nobbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > just pointing out that the rails guys dont have much wiggle room.
> > surely, youre familiar w/ this post:
> > http://www.oreillynet.com/ruby/blog/2007/09/7_reaso
Hi all,
The manual says,
XXXVII. File Alteration Monitor Functions
..
..
Note: This extension has been moved to the » PECL repository and is no
longer bundled with PHP as of PHP 5.1.0.
..
..
But i am unable to locate it on PECL either.
Is there any way to use FAM/GAMIN with PHP ?
--
Regards
Anyone have any trouble with this combination? It consistently crashes
for me.
http://pear.php.net
Thanks.
--
Richard Heyes
http://www.websupportsolutions.co.uk
Knowledge Base and Helpdesk software for £299pa hosted for you -
no installation, no maintenance, new features automatic and free
-
Richard Heyes schreef:
Anyone have any trouble with this combination? It consistently crashes
for me.
firefox not an option? or anything else that resembles a proper browser ;-)
http://pear.php.net
Thanks.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://ww
On Jan 30, 2008, at 7:53 PM, Richard Lynch wrote:
On Tue, January 29, 2008 1:39 pm, Jason Pruim wrote:
Okay, so I checked everything I can think of, and it's still
downloading it as an application which means it's downloading the
entire website instead of just the data from the database... Any
2008. 01. 31, csütörtök keltezéssel 08.12-kor Jason Pruim ezt írta:
> On Jan 30, 2008, at 7:53 PM, Richard Lynch wrote:
>
> > On Tue, January 29, 2008 1:39 pm, Jason Pruim wrote:
> >> Okay, so I checked everything I can think of, and it's still
> >> downloading it as an application which means it'
On Jan 31, 2008 7:33 AM, Jochem Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Richard Heyes schreef:
> > Anyone have any trouble with this combination? It consistently crashes
> > for me.
>
> firefox not an option? or anything else that resembles a proper browser ;-)
>
> >
> > http://pear.php.net
> >
> > Thank
On Jan 31, 2008, at 8:19 AM, Zoltán Németh wrote:
I can try :) when I downloaded in clicking on the link, and tried to
open it OS X popped on a message saying that I had downloaded an
applicaiton and it was the first time I had tried to open it, was I
sure that I wanted to, and I could view th
Anup Shukla wrote:
Hi all,
The manual says,
XXXVII. File Alteration Monitor Functions
..
..
Note: This extension has been moved to the » PECL repository and is no
longer bundled with PHP as of PHP 5.1.0.
..
..
But i am unable to locate it on PECL either.
Is there any way to use FAM/GAMIN wi
Eric Butera schreef:
On Jan 31, 2008 7:33 AM, Jochem Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Richard Heyes schreef:
Anyone have any trouble with this combination? It consistently crashes
for me.
firefox not an option? or anything else that resembles a proper browser ;-)
http://pear.php.net
Thanks.
2008. 01. 31, csütörtök keltezéssel 09.41-kor Nathan Nobbe ezt írta:
> On Jan 31, 2008 3:24 AM, Zoltán Németh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I never write the xml for propel. we use DBDesigner (although
> it is not
> a well-written software, and there are problems with running
im curious, greg, what the ruby guys do for code documentation.
for php there is phpDocumentor or doxygen. i like them both.
propel has support for the former so when i generate the code
from a schema.xml file, the next thing i do is generate the
phpDocumentor-based docs for my project which is ju
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 14:35 +, Richard Heyes wrote:
> > firefox not an option?
>
> Nope.
>
> > or anything else that resembles a proper browser ;-)
>
> Strange, IE has been working fine for me for the last eight years...
I can see your point. If all you know is subpar then subpar works fi
On Jan 31, 2008 3:24 AM, Zoltán Németh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I never write the xml for propel. we use DBDesigner (although it is not
> a well-written software, and there are problems with running it on
> linux) and convert its xml files automatically to propel format. what's
> more we have
firefox not an option?
Nope.
> or anything else that resembles a proper browser ;-)
Strange, IE has been working fine for me for the last eight years...
--
Richard Heyes
http://www.websupportsolutions.co.uk
Knowledge Base and Helpdesk software for £299pa hosted for you -
no installation, no
On Jan 31, 2008 9:27 AM, Jochem Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eric Butera schreef:
>
> > On Jan 31, 2008 7:33 AM, Jochem Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Richard Heyes schreef:
> >>> Anyone have any trouble with this combination? It consistently crashes
> >>> for me.
> >> firefox not an opt
I have been using:
$nextSaturday= date("m/d/Y",strtotime("next saturday"));
For months long time now with out problems, but in the last two days, it
went kind of funky. It is now returning:
02/09/2008 instead of the expected 02/02/2008. I have tried the same code
on another server and differen
On Jan 31, 2008 9:47 AM, Zoltán Németh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you mean you have a schema in a db with a bunch of tables? there is a
> symfony task for that. symfony propel-build-schema
>
> or if you use propel alone:
>
> http://propel.phpdb.org/trac/wiki/Users/Documentation/1.3/HowTos/Existi
Ya - the other server is 4.4.7
However - this does not seem to be the problem necessarily:
print date("m/d/Y",strtotime("next saturday"));
02/09/2008
print date("m/d/Y",strtotime("next sunday"));
02/10/2008
print date("m/d/Y",strtotime("next monday"));
02/11/2008
print date("m/d/Y",strtotime("
Mike Morton wrote:
I have been using:
$nextSaturday= date("m/d/Y",strtotime("next saturday"));
For months long time now with out problems, but in the last two days, it
went kind of funky. It is now returning:
02/09/2008 instead of the expected 02/02/2008. I have tried the same code
on anothe
Richard Heyes schreef:
firefox not an option?
Nope.
> or anything else that resembles a proper browser ;-)
Strange, IE has been working fine for me for the last eight years...
that's the kind of thing people say just after they hear they have prostrate
cancer ;-)
seriously though - why i
Eric Butera schreef:
On Jan 31, 2008 9:27 AM, Jochem Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eric Butera schreef:
On Jan 31, 2008 7:33 AM, Jochem Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Richard Heyes schreef:
Anyone have any trouble with this combination? It consistently crashes
for me.
firefox not an opti
On 31/01/2008, Mike Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have been using:
>
> $nextSaturday= date("m/d/Y",strtotime("next saturday"));
>
> For months long time now with out problems, but in the last two days, it
> went kind of funky. It is now returning:
>
> 02/09/2008 instead of the expected 0
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 17:14 +0100, Jochem Maas wrote:
let's not forget that nobody outside of IT actually uses Opera
Please back up that st-ass-tistic please. Methinks you reached around
and pulled it out of your lightless nether regions.
I wouldn't say nobody, but cer
On 31/01/2008, Mike Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ya - the other server is 4.4.7
>
> However - this does not seem to be the problem necessarily:
>
> print date("m/d/Y",strtotime("next saturday"));
> 02/09/2008
>
> print date("m/d/Y",strtotime("next sunday"));
> 02/10/2008
>
> print date("m/
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 17:14 +0100, Jochem Maas wrote:
> let's not forget that nobody outside of IT actually uses Opera
Please back up that st-ass-tistic please. Methinks you reached around
and pulled it out of your lightless nether regions.
Cheers,
Rob.
--
.-
On Jan 31, 2008 11:14 AM, Jochem Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eric Butera schreef:
> > On Jan 31, 2008 9:27 AM, Jochem Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Eric Butera schreef:
> >>
> >>> On Jan 31, 2008 7:33 AM, Jochem Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Richard Heyes schreef:
> > Anyo
On Jan 31, 2008 12:02 PM, Jochem Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Cummings schreef:
> > On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 17:14 +0100, Jochem Maas wrote:
> >> let's not forget that nobody outside of IT actually uses Opera
> >
> > Please back up that st-ass-tistic please. Methinks you reached around
> >
Eric Butera schreef:
On Jan 31, 2008 11:14 AM, Jochem Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eric Butera schreef:
On Jan 31, 2008 9:27 AM, Jochem Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eric Butera schreef:
On Jan 31, 2008 7:33 AM, Jochem Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Richard Heyes schreef:
Anyone have
Robert Cummings schreef:
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 17:14 +0100, Jochem Maas wrote:
let's not forget that nobody outside of IT actually uses Opera
Please back up that st-ass-tistic please. Methinks you reached around
and pulled it out of your lightless nether regions.
given that you can prove any
Jochem Maas wrote:
Richard Heyes schreef:
firefox not an option?
Nope.
> or anything else that resembles a proper browser ;-)
Strange, IE has been working fine for me for the last eight years...
that's the kind of thing people say just after they hear they have
prostrate cancer ;-)
Lol
Eric Butera schreef:
On Jan 31, 2008 12:02 PM, Jochem Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Robert Cummings schreef:
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 17:14 +0100, Jochem Maas wrote:
let's not forget that nobody outside of IT actually uses Opera
Please back up that st-ass-tistic please. Methinks you reached ar
Richard Heyes schreef:
Jochem Maas wrote:
Richard Heyes schreef:
firefox not an option?
Nope.
> or anything else that resembles a proper browser ;-)
Strange, IE has been working fine for me for the last eight years...
that's the kind of thing people say just after they hear they have
pr
On Jan 31, 2008 12:16 PM, Jochem Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you didn't state anything of the sort until just then.
> and you do realise that Acid2 is not actually a standard AND that there
> are plenty of differences of opinion regarding the minutae of 'proper
> implementation' of some of th
i like opera for 4 reasons,
1. it renders fast
2. when i have 50 tabs open, its still responsive
3. it supports ctrl+z, wicked feature :>
4. when you close and reopen, all the tabs from before are still there; key
however, firefox is the champion for web development.
not only is firebug awesome, b
PHP is a server-side page generator. It has NOTHING to do with the browser.
The PHP programmer determines the content of the resulting HTML and the
browser reacts to THAT. Browsers never see a line of PHP script!
-Original Message-
From: Richard Heyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: T
Nathan Nobbe schreef:
i like opera for 4 reasons,
1. it renders fast
2. when i have 50 tabs open, its still responsive
3. it supports ctrl+z, wicked feature :>
undo? undo what?
4. when you close and reopen, all the tabs from before are still there; key
however, firefox is the champion for we
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 18:02 +0100, Jochem Maas wrote:
> Robert Cummings schreef:
> > On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 17:14 +0100, Jochem Maas wrote:
> >> let's not forget that nobody outside of IT actually uses Opera
> >
> > Please back up that st-ass-tistic please. Methinks you reached around
> > and pull
Nathan Nobbe wrote:
> On Jan 30, 2008 2:47 AM, Per Jessen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Philip, please state what sort of problems you are having. mail() and
>> sendmail are both easy to use from php.
>> And please don't post another 2000 lines of code. No-one is going to
>> read them.
>>
On Jan 31, 2008 12:32 PM, Nathan Nobbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i like opera for 4 reasons,
> 1. it renders fast
> 2. when i have 50 tabs open, its still responsive
> 3. it supports ctrl+z, wicked feature :>
> 4. when you close and reopen, all the tabs from before are still there; key
>
> howev
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 18:18 +0100, Jochem Maas wrote:
> Eric Butera schreef:
> > On Jan 31, 2008 12:02 PM, Jochem Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Robert Cummings schreef:
> >>> On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 17:14 +0100, Jochem Maas wrote:
> let's not forget that nobody outside of IT actually use
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 18:42 +0100, Jochem Maas wrote:
> Nathan Nobbe schreef:
> > i like opera for 4 reasons,
> > 1. it renders fast
> > 2. when i have 50 tabs open, its still responsive
> > 3. it supports ctrl+z, wicked feature :>
>
> undo? undo what?
What you just typed into a form, or erased
Mr Webber schreef:
PHP is a server-side page generator. It has NOTHING to do with the browser.
The PHP programmer determines the content of the resulting HTML and the
browser reacts to THAT. Browsers never see a line of PHP script!
yes I think Richard knows that. he was asking whether anybod
Tom Chubb schreef:
I am looking to buy a Mac in a couple of weeks primarily for writing music
using Apple Logic Studio 8 which will run absolutely fine on a MacBook.
However, I am considering installing something like MAMP and using that as
my development server too at which point I'm wondering w
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 12:25 -0500, Eric Butera wrote:
> On Jan 31, 2008 12:16 PM, Jochem Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > you didn't state anything of the sort until just then.
> > and you do realise that Acid2 is not actually a standard AND that there
> > are plenty of differences of opinion r
I am looking to buy a Mac in a couple of weeks primarily for writing music
using Apple Logic Studio 8 which will run absolutely fine on a MacBook.
However, I am considering installing something like MAMP and using that as
my development server too at which point I'm wondering whether I should
inves
On Jan 31, 2008 12:29 PM, Tom Chubb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I guess what I'm asking is, does having Apache, MySQL & PHP installed on
> a Mac use much system resources?
Nope. I used to run it on an old G4 as a desktop just fine. ;)
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To uns
Maybe it's just me, but I've never quite figured out what people mean
when they say "next Saturday"...
Do they mean the next one coming up?
Or do they mean that there's "this Saturday" coming up and "next
Saturday" the one after that?
And if I can't figure it out, why would you expect PHP to fig
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 19:06 +0100, Jochem Maas wrote:
> Robert Cummings schreef:
> > On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 18:02 +0100, Jochem Maas wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > Would you believe me if I said I wasn't in IT? ;) My wife isn't in IT,
> > but she uses Opera regularly, she likes it's speed and the way it z
On Jan 31, 2008 1:03 PM, Jochem Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Cummings schreef:
> > What you just typed into a form, or erased and decide you actually want,
> > etc.
>
> FF does that - at least it does for me, has done for as long as I can
> remember.
it doesnt let you reclaim lost ta
On Jan 31, 2008, at 12:29 PM, Tom Chubb wrote:
I am looking to buy a Mac in a couple of weeks primarily for writing
music
using Apple Logic Studio 8 which will run absolutely fine on a
MacBook.
However, I am considering installing something like MAMP and using
that as
my development server
On Thu, January 31, 2008 11:29 am, Tom Chubb wrote:
> I am looking to buy a Mac in a couple of weeks primarily for writing
> music
> using Apple Logic Studio 8 which will run absolutely fine on a
> MacBook.
> However, I am considering installing something like MAMP and using
> that as
> my developm
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 19:03 +0100, Jochem Maas wrote:
> Robert Cummings schreef:
> > On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 18:42 +0100, Jochem Maas wrote:
> >> Nathan Nobbe schreef:
> >>> i like opera for 4 reasons,
> >>> 1. it renders fast
> >>> 2. when i have 50 tabs open, its still responsive
> >>> 3. it suppo
On 31/01/2008, philip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Nathan Nobbe wrote:
> > On Jan 30, 2008 2:47 AM, Per Jessen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Philip, please state what sort of problems you are having. mail() and
> >> sendmail are both easy to use from php.
> >> And please don't post ano
On Thu, January 31, 2008 1:19 am, Per Jessen wrote:
> Richard Lynch wrote:
>
>> On Tue, January 29, 2008 12:48 pm, Per Jessen wrote:
>>> Robert Cummings wrote:
>>>
Actually, now you made me think on it... the primary reason I
disable
referrer logging is because it will also pass alon
On 31/01/2008, Richard Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, January 31, 2008 11:29 am, Tom Chubb wrote:
> > I am looking to buy a Mac in a couple of weeks primarily for writing
> > music
> > using Apple Logic Studio 8 which will run absolutely fine on a
> > MacBook.
> > However, I am consid
Robert Cummings schreef:
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 18:42 +0100, Jochem Maas wrote:
Nathan Nobbe schreef:
i like opera for 4 reasons,
1. it renders fast
2. when i have 50 tabs open, its still responsive
3. it supports ctrl+z, wicked feature :>
undo? undo what?
What you just typed into a form, or
On Jan 31, 2008 1:29 PM, Richard Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, January 31, 2008 1:19 am, Per Jessen wrote:
> > Richard Lynch wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, January 29, 2008 12:48 pm, Per Jessen wrote:
> >>> Robert Cummings wrote:
> >>>
> Actually, now you made me think on it... the prima
On Wed, January 30, 2008 9:42 pm, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
> On Jan 30, 2008 7:58 PM, Richard Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I don't use SPL because it makes my head spin to read it, and I
>> never
>> ever try to do something as silly as iterate over a *LARGE* array in
>> end-user pages.
>
> are th
Robert Cummings schreef:
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 18:02 +0100, Jochem Maas wrote:
...
Would you believe me if I said I wasn't in IT? ;) My wife isn't in IT,
but she uses Opera regularly, she likes it's speed and the way it zooms.
My 4 year old son loves Opera, but he doesn't know anything else
PHP is a server-side page generator. It has NOTHING to do with the browser.
The PHP programmer determines the content of the resulting HTML and the
browser reacts to THAT. Browsers never see a line of PHP script!
What's your point?
--
Richard Heyes
http://www.websupportsolutions.co.uk
Knowle
On Jan 31, 2008 1:50 PM, Richard Heyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > PHP is a server-side page generator. It has NOTHING to do with the browser.
> > The PHP programmer determines the content of the resulting HTML and the
> > browser reacts to THAT. Browsers never see a line of PHP script!
>
> Wh
Richard Lynch wrote:
>>> It CANNOT be tied to the IP address, because most users' IP
>>> addresses are not static.
>>
>> I think it is for the duration of the session. Mine certainly is.
>
> Yours might be.
> AOL users are *NOT*.
> In peak periods, an AOL users' IP address with change with every
Eric Butera wrote:
>
> The fact it can be tampered with should be enough to ignore it, right?
>
Well, no. _anything_ can be tampered with given the right amount of
resources. For instance, exactly _when_ an otherwise unbreakable
encryption is borken is _only_ a matter of money. How far you g
Robert Cummings wrote:
> Information leakage is a security issue. IMHO referer logging should
> need to be turned on, not off.
Rob, I appreciate your opinion, but like I said - when Firefox (or MSIE)
switches off REFERER by default, we can talk again.
/Per Jessen, Zürich
--
PHP General Maili
On Jan 31, 2008 2:24 PM, Per Jessen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Richard Lynch wrote:
>
> >>> It CANNOT be tied to the IP address, because most users' IP
> >>> addresses are not static.
> >>
> >> I think it is for the duration of the session. Mine certainly is.
> >
> > Yours might be.
> > AOL users
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 20:24 +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
> Richard Lynch wrote:
>
> >>> It CANNOT be tied to the IP address, because most users' IP
> >>> addresses are not static.
> >>
> >> I think it is for the duration of the session. Mine certainly is.
> >
> > Yours might be.
> > AOL users are *NO
On Jan 31, 2008 2:49 PM, Per Jessen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Cummings wrote:
>
> > Information leakage is a security issue. IMHO referer logging should
> > need to be turned on, not off.
>
> Rob, I appreciate your opinion, but like I said - when Firefox (or MSIE)
> switches off REFERER b
Andrew Ballard wrote:
>>> Yours might be.
>>> AOL users are *NOT*.
>>> In peak periods, an AOL users' IP address with change with every
>>> HTTP request.
>>
>> Surely you are joking?? Don't they use DHCP for dishing out
>> addresses? I guess AOL users just have to do without https during
>> peak
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 20:49 +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
> Robert Cummings wrote:
>
> > Information leakage is a security issue. IMHO referer logging should
> > need to be turned on, not off.
>
> Rob, I appreciate your opinion, but like I said - when Firefox (or MSIE)
> switches off REFERER by defau
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 15:10 -0500, Robert Cummings wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 20:49 +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
> > Robert Cummings wrote:
> >
> > > Information leakage is a security issue. IMHO referer logging should
> > > need to be turned on, not off.
> >
> > Rob, I appreciate your opinion,
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 21:32 +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
> Robert Cummings wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 15:10 -0500, Robert Cummings wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 20:49 +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
> >> > Robert Cummings wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Information leakage is a security issue. IMHO refe
Robert Cummings wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 15:10 -0500, Robert Cummings wrote:
>> On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 20:49 +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
>> > Robert Cummings wrote:
>> >
>> > > Information leakage is a security issue. IMHO referer logging
>> > > should need to be turned on, not off.
>> >
>> >
Robert Cummings wrote:
> So at least the spec explicitly recommends allowing the user to set
> whether the referrer is sent. As such, no site should rely on it.
Agreed, in principle it should not be relied upon. But then neither
should MSIE[567] :-)
Besides, today Firefox and Opera both allow
Tom Chubb wrote:
> Thanks for all your responses.
> Rich, I guess you're right! Anyway PHP is only a hobby for personal sites,
> so I shouldn't really worry too much but wanted to get a general feel from
> people.
> The only big advantage for the MBP is that it has Firewire 800 which would
> be bet
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 22:36 +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
> Robert Cummings wrote:
>
> Anyway, thanks for some interesting points, Rob - I like an intelligent
> response. Quoting the HTTP spec to me was good - I'll have to be a
> little wary of you in the future :-)
I was just padding my end of week b
On 31/01/2008, Colin Guthrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Tom Chubb wrote:
> > Thanks for all your responses.
> > Rich, I guess you're right! Anyway PHP is only a hobby for personal
> sites,
> > so I shouldn't really worry too much but wanted to get a general feel
> from
> > people.
> > The only
Mike Morton schreef:
Good point ;)
Except that generally, when am told "next Saturday" - I take that to mean
"the next Saturday" - just one more ambiguity in the english language that
makes it so hard to learn I suppose!
The odd thing about this whole situation it that it seems to have cropped
Good point ;)
Except that generally, when am told "next Saturday" - I take that to mean
"the next Saturday" - just one more ambiguity in the english language that
makes it so hard to learn I suppose!
The odd thing about this whole situation it that it seems to have cropped up
just after we "upgra
On Thu, January 31, 2008 11:44 am, philip wrote:
>
>
> Nathan Nobbe wrote:
>> On Jan 30, 2008 2:47 AM, Per Jessen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Philip, please state what sort of problems you are having. mail()
>>> and
>>> sendmail are both easy to use from php.
>>> And please don't post anothe
On Thu, January 31, 2008 1:40 am, Per Jessen wrote:
> Richard Lynch wrote:
>
>> On Mon, January 28, 2008 2:52 pm, Per Jessen wrote:
>>> True again. However, I was commenting on your assertion that
>>> "Process
>>> forking has EVERYTHING to do with thread safety", which I will stay
>>> is
>>> wron
> -Original Message-
> From: Jochem Maas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 8:19 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: PHP General List
> Subject: Re: [PHP] PEAR website and MSIE 6
>
> Richard Heyes schreef:
> >> firefox not an option?
> >
> > Nope.
> >
> > > or
On Thu, January 31, 2008 3:29 pm, Mike Morton wrote:
> Except that generally, when am told "next Saturday" - I take that to
> mean
> "the next Saturday" - just one more ambiguity in the english language
> that
> makes it so hard to learn I suppose!
strtotime has always seemed to me like it's borde
On Thu, January 31, 2008 4:30 pm, Daevid Vincent wrote:
> Please stop with the browser wars. They're boring and tired and serve
> no
> purpose.
+1
> IE6 is fast and launches in 1 second. FF takes many seconds.
E.
Isn't that because IE6 pre-loads everything during the BOOT process,
slowing t
On Thu, January 31, 2008 12:50 pm, Richard Heyes wrote:
>> PHP is a server-side page generator. It has NOTHING to do with the
>> browser.
>> The PHP programmer determines the content of the resulting HTML and
>> the
>> browser reacts to THAT. Browsers never see a line of PHP script!
>
> What's yo
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Lynch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > IE6 is fast and launches in 1 second. FF takes many seconds.
>
> Isn't that because IE6 pre-loads everything during the BOOT process,
> slowing that down quite a bit?...
I guess. I leave my XP box on all the ti
> > I don't use a mac myself but a colleague does. He seems to have apache
> > and PHP installed on the machine but he generally uses the Xampp
> > package. I don't know if this is the official home page or but but start
> > here: http://www.apachefriends.org/en/xampp-macosx.html
> Thanks Colin,
>
On Jan 30, 2008 7:21 PM, Jochem Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greg's my hero of the day - even if he has been banging the Ruby drum on
> the PHP Stage half the night ;-)
PHP is a great language. I don't plan to stop using it anytime soon.
--
Greg Donald
http://destiney.com/
--
PHP Genera
Daevid Vincent schreef:
-Original Message-
From: Jochem Maas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 8:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: PHP General List
Subject: Re: [PHP] PEAR website and MSIE 6
Richard Heyes schreef:
firefox not an option?
Nope.
> or anything
Go to windowsupdate. There was an update for IE6 for websites randomly
crashing. I know, because I was affected. Some update broke IE6 and
then you had to update a second time.
Make sure you're all up to date (and restart, sigh) - and it should be good.
On 1/31/08, Richard Heyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Per Jessen schreef:
Richard Lynch wrote:
OK, what is a 'geometry column' and what is a 'spatial index' ?
Imagine a single column combining both longitude and latitude.
Now imagine an index that "knows" about long/lat, and keeps
geographically "close" objects sorted in the index for you.
Incl
all,
as ive been researching SPL lately ive read several times that spl will
store only the current element of the underlying collection in memory
during iteration. articles that mention this will say that using these
iterators should afford savings when traversing large collections. well
having
On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 03:40 +0100, Jochem Maas wrote:
> I for one would really like to see a concrete example of this kind of
> use of geometry columns and spacial indexes as an alternative to the stand
> integer based primary keys.
On one of my local postGIS tables:
CREATE INDEX k1
ON kanag
The next major release of the Chisimba PHP5 framework is now available.
Major enhancements included in this release are:
- Remote downloads of modules through web interface
- Upgrades of modules via package server in modulecatalogue
- Skin downloads via remote package server
- Updates to mod
Hello,
Has anyone tried to use this function? Does php actually support mysql
embedded server or is this just a stub for future use? I'm trying to convert
a mysql-based web app to a desktop app and rather than refactor everything
to use sqlite, It would be interesting if I could use mysql embedded
96 matches
Mail list logo
