Re: [PHP] call to a member function select() on a non object.

you already had the answer to this problem. do try to read the error message properly. a 'non object' is quite clear - if in doubt about what something is or something should be use var_dump() or print_r() to output the variable in question (e.g. $DB, which you would have seen was NULL). now fo

Re: [PHP] Need assistance using sendmail or mail()

On 30/01/2008, Per Jessen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > philip wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I need assistance using sendmail or mail() as my web hosting service > > does not allow opening sockets. > > > > This is the code I use: > > Philip, please state what sort of problems you are having.

Re: [PHP] How can I do this -- method chaining

Nathan Nobbe wrote: On Jan 29, 2008 7:27 PM, Stut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Personally I'd use a static method in this instance. thats what i recommended. If you need to create an instance of the class you can do so in the static method and that way it will get destroyed when the function i

Re: [PHP] How can I do this -- method chaining

Stut schreef: Nathan Nobbe wrote: On Jan 29, 2008 7:27 PM, Stut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Personally I'd use a static method in this instance. thats what i recommended. If you need to create an instance of the class you can do so in the static method and that way it will get destroyed whe

Re: [PHP] php embeded in html after first submit html disappear

Janet N schreef: Hi there, I have two forms on the same php page. Both forms has php embeded inside html with it's own submit button. How do I keep the second form from not disappearing when I click submit on the first form? My issue is that when I click the submit button from the first form

Re: [PHP] How can I do this -- method chaining

Jochem Maas wrote: Stut schreef: Nathan Nobbe wrote: On Jan 29, 2008 7:27 PM, Stut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Personally I'd use a static method in this instance. thats what i recommended. If you need to create an instance of the class you can do so in the static method and that way it wi

Re: [PHP] How can I do this -- method chaining

Stut schreef: Jochem Maas wrote: Stut schreef: Nathan Nobbe wrote: On Jan 29, 2008 7:27 PM, Stut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Personally I'd use a static method in this instance. thats what i recommended. If you need to create an instance of the class you can do so in the static method and

Re: [PHP] How can I do this -- method chaining

Nathan Nobbe wrote: Actually, I don't think so. I believe constructors return void, while the 'new' keyword returns a copy of the object. im pretty sure constructors return an object instance: php > class Test { function __construct() {} } php > var_dump(new Test()); object(Test)#1 (0) { }

Re: [PHP] potentially __sleep() bug

Nathan Nobbe wrote: all, i was playing around w/ some object serialization tonight during further exploration of spl and i stumbled on what appears to be a bug in the behavior of the __sleep() magic method. here is the pertinent documentation on the method ..is supposed to return an array w

Re: [PHP] How can I do this -- method chaining

Anup Shukla schreef: Nathan Nobbe wrote: Actually, I don't think so. I believe constructors return void, while the 'new' keyword returns a copy of the object. im pretty sure constructors return an object instance: php > class Test { function __construct() {} } php > var_dump(new Test()); obje

Re: [PHP] Another question about functions...

On Jan 29, 2008, at 4:29 PM, Nathan Nobbe wrote: On Jan 29, 2008 3:53 PM, Jason Pruim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I did as you suggested, and I think I found the reason... I included info for the doctype, and some files that are on all my pages... Once I comment out those lines it works just

Re: [PHP] first php 5 class

On Jan 29, 2008 3:29 PM, Nathan Nobbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 29, 2008 3:19 PM, nihilism machine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Ok, trying to write my first php5 class. This is my first project > > using all OOP PHP5.2.5. > > > > I want to create a config class, which is extended by a

Re: [PHP] How can I do this -- method chaining

On Jan 30, 2008 5:56 AM, Stut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nathan Nobbe wrote: > You posted a singleton pattern. no, what i posted was a simple factory pattern. if you invoke it twice there will be 2 instances of Test in memory, eg. not singleton. $a = Test::getInstance(); $b = Test::getInstance

Re: [PHP] first php 5 class

On Jan 30, 2008 8:40 AM, Eric Butera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 29, 2008 3:29 PM, Nathan Nobbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Still pimping singleton, huh? :) > hell yeah :) i looked at the registry classes you pointed out. you know what funny about the one in solar? they refer to the sam

[PHP] We need PHP/LAMP Developers and Programmers in FL, MD, VA, NY, DC, CA, MA!!!!

We need PHP/LAMP Developers and Programmers in FL, MD, VA, NY, DC, CA, MA World NetMedia is a world class leader in the development of multimedia internet sites. We are seeking highly motivated individuals who eat, breath, and love the work they do. If you like working in a fun, laid-back, ye

Re: [PHP] How can I do this -- method chaining

Nathan Nobbe wrote: On Jan 30, 2008 10:46 AM, Stut <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Nathan Nobbe wrote: Actually no, I mean I would *just* use a static method. If there is no reason to instantiate an object, why would you? you realize you a

Re: [PHP] How can I do this -- method chaining

On Jan 30, 2008 10:46 AM, Stut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nathan Nobbe wrote: > > Actually no, I mean I would *just* use a static method. If there is no > reason to instantiate an object, why would you? you realize you are instantiating an class in the code you posted, right

Re: [PHP] first php 5 class

On Jan 30, 2008 9:57 AM, Nathan Nobbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 30, 2008 8:40 AM, Eric Butera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jan 29, 2008 3:29 PM, Nathan Nobbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Still pimping singleton, huh? :) > > > > hell yeah :) > > i looked at the registry cl

Re: [PHP] How can I do this -- method chaining

Nathan Nobbe wrote: It's fairly likely that I'd actually just use a static method here, both your and my code use static methods. it sounds to me like you are using the term 'static method' to mean a static method that has a variable with a reference to an instance of the class that it is

Re: [PHP] How can I do this -- method chaining

Stut wrote: Nathan Nobbe wrote: On Jan 30, 2008 10:53 AM, Stut <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Nathan Nobbe wrote: I never said I wasn't creating an instance in the example I posted. then what exactly did you mean by this? Actually no, I mean I would *just*

Re: [PHP] How can I do this -- method chaining

Nathan Nobbe wrote: On Jan 30, 2008 10:53 AM, Stut <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Nathan Nobbe wrote: I never said I wasn't creating an instance in the example I posted. then what exactly did you mean by this? Actually no, I mean I would *just* use a static

Re: [PHP] first php 5 class

On Jan 30, 2008 10:35 AM, Eric Butera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The only gripe I have about the registry pattern is the lack of code > completion in PDT. ;) heh. does that still blowup when you try to open a file w/ an interface definition? > I love php patterns, but it seems to sort of be

Re: [PHP] How can I do this -- method chaining

On Jan 30, 2008 10:53 AM, Stut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nathan Nobbe wrote: > I never said I wasn't creating > an instance in the example I posted. > then what exactly did you mean by this? Actually no, I mean I would *just* use a static method. If there is no reason to instantiate an object

Re: [PHP] How can I do this -- method chaining

Stut wrote: Nathan Nobbe wrote: On Jan 30, 2008 10:53 AM, Stut <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Nathan Nobbe wrote: I never said I wasn't creating an instance in the example I posted. then what exactly did you mean by this? Actually no, I mean I would *just*

Re: [PHP] How can I do this -- method chaining

On Jan 30, 2008 11:21 AM, Stut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Calling a static method > does not create an instance of the class. there you go again; calling a static method does create an instance of the class if you call new inside of it :P -nathan

Re: [PHP] How can I do this -- method chaining

Jim Lucas wrote: Stut wrote: Nathan Nobbe wrote: On Jan 30, 2008 10:53 AM, Stut <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Nathan Nobbe wrote: I never said I wasn't creating an instance in the example I posted. then what exactly did you mean by this? Actually no, I m

Re: [PHP] first php 5 class

On Jan 30, 2008 10:13 AM, Nathan Nobbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I love php patterns, but it seems to sort of be dead for years now. > > me too; ya, it is sort of dead, sad, but its still worth a look to people > getting > there feet wet w/ patterns, and occasionally as a point of reference fo

Re: [PHP] How can I do this -- method chaining

On Jan 30, 2008 11:31 AM, Stut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "I would *just* use a static method" > > *just* *just* *just* *just* *just* *just* *just* *just* *just* > > No instance. None. Grrr. here is a mod of the code you posted w/ a var_dump() of the local variable $o; _doSomething(); }

Re: [PHP] How can I do this -- method chaining

Nathan Nobbe wrote: On Jan 30, 2008 11:21 AM, Stut <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Calling a static method does not create an instance of the class. there you go again; calling a static method does create an instance of the class if you call new inside of it :P

Re: [PHP] first php 5 class

On Jan 30, 2008 11:38 AM, Greg Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If list traffic is any sign, PHP is indeed slowing down from the "new > peeps wanting to learn it" perspective: > > http://marc.info/?l=php-general&w=2 interesting.. I would assume it's becau

Re: [PHP] How can I do this -- method chaining

Nathan Nobbe wrote: On Jan 30, 2008 11:31 AM, Stut <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: "I would *just* use a static method" *just* *just* *just* *just* *just* *just* *just* *just* *just* No instance. None. Grrr. here is a mod of the code you posted w/ a var_du

Re: [PHP] first php 5 class

On Jan 30, 2008 11:43 AM, Nathan Nobbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 30, 2008 11:38 AM, Greg Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > If list traffic is any sign, PHP is indeed slowing down from the "new > > peeps wanting to learn it" perspective: > > > > http://marc.info/?l=php-general&w=2 >

[PHP] php spanish character problem

hello everyone, This is important,I am trying to post some spanish characters from a form on a page and i am comparing those spanish characters to the same letters on the same page but on strcmp the return is not zero.I don't know what is wrong some problem with the post method i guess or strcmp

Re: [PHP] php spanish character problem

On Jan 30, 2008 12:07 PM, greenCountry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > hello everyone, > > This is important,I am trying to post some spanish characters from a form on > a page and i am comparing those spanish characters to the same letters on > the same page but on strcmp the return is not zero.I d

Re: [PHP] How can I do this -- method chaining

On Jan 30, 2008 11:58 AM, Stut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, I'm going to have to assume you really are as stupid as you seem. If > I need to provide an example to demonstrate what I meant I will, but I > feel I made it quite clear that my comment regarding what *I* would do > did not in any wa

Re: [PHP] first php 5 class

On Jan 30, 2008 11:13 AM, Nathan Nobbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i dont think Registry::getInstance() is really that much overhead; In my initial tests I found that static methods accessing $GLOBALS directly was much faster than using an instance and working on it tucked away in a static variab

Re: [PHP] How can I do this -- method chaining

Stut wrote: Nathan Nobbe wrote: On Jan 30, 2008 11:31 AM, Stut <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: "I would *just* use a static method" *just* *just* *just* *just* *just* *just* *just* *just* *just* No instance. None. Grrr. here is a mod of the code you poste

Re: [PHP] How can I do this -- method chaining

Nathan Nobbe wrote: On Jan 30, 2008 11:58 AM, Stut <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Ok, I'm going to have to assume you really are as stupid as you seem. If I need to provide an example to demonstrate what I meant I will, but I feel I made it quite clear that my

Re: [PHP] How can I do this -- method chaining

> > Indeed. Now, the place where you sleep... is it guarded? well it is, but.. i probly misunderstood some implication in the directions of my virtual fortress and therefore, probly not as well a i suspect ;) -nathan

Re: [PHP] first php 5 class

On Jan 30, 2008 10:43 AM, Nathan Nobbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I would assume it's because there are much more interesting advances > > in web development technology to focus on elsewhere. > > such as ? Ruby 1.9, Ruby on Rails 2, Perl6/Parrot. Parrot is particularly interesting, especially

Re: [PHP] first php 5 class

2008. 01. 30, szerda keltezéssel 11.45-kor Greg Donald ezt írta: > On Jan 30, 2008 10:43 AM, Nathan Nobbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I would assume it's because there are much more interesting advances > > > in web development technology to focus on elsewhere. > > > > such as ? > > Ruby 1.9,

Re: [PHP] first php 5 class

On Jan 30, 2008 12:45 PM, Greg Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 30, 2008 10:43 AM, Nathan Nobbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I would assume it's because there are much more interesting advances > > > in web development technology to focus on elsewhere. > > > > such as ? > > Ruby 1.9,

Re: [PHP] How can I do this -- method chaining

Jim Lucas wrote: Stut wrote: Nathan Nobbe wrote: On Jan 30, 2008 11:31 AM, Stut <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: "I would *just* use a static method" *just* *just* *just* *just* *just* *just* *just* *just* *just* No instance. None. Grrr. here is a mod of

Re: [PHP] first php 5 class

On Jan 30, 2008 11:52 AM, Zoltán Németh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > oh the Ruby and Rails stuff here it comes again... I really don't see > why is it a 'more interesting advance in web development technology'... > and what's more important for me, I really don't like it ;) It's opinionated softwa

[PHP] Help looking for inventory software

Hello, I am sorry if this is appropriate but does anyone know php based, open source solution that would enable me to put a system handling inventory (books, booklets). I work for a charity and we are archiving our old products by making a digital archive. So far we have been doing it in Excel but

Re: [PHP] first php 5 class

2008. 01. 30, szerda keltezéssel 12.03-kor Greg Donald ezt írta: > On Jan 30, 2008 11:52 AM, Zoltán Németh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > oh the Ruby and Rails stuff here it comes again... I really don't see > > why is it a 'more interesting advance in web development technology'... > > and what's

Re: [PHP] first php 5 class

On Jan 30, 2008 11:56 AM, Nathan Nobbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i love how the ruby crew has 1 framework, whereas php has scads. Ruby has 7 frameworks that I know of: Nitro, IOWA, Ramaze, Cerise, Ruby on Rails, Merb and Camping. http://www.nitroproject.org/ http://enigo.com/projects/iowa/ htt

Re: [PHP] first php 5 class

On Jan 30, 2008 12:15 PM, Zoltán Németh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It's opinionated software and is certainly not for everyone. > > ok it's not for everyone, certainly not for me. but what is it from your > point of view that makes it a 'more interesting advance'? 1) Test driven development is

RE: [PHP] Help looking for inventory software

check for code / systems on www.hotscripts.com http://sourceforge.net hth bastien> Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:14:57 +0100> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: php-general@lists.php.net> Subject: [PHP] Help looking for inventory software> > Hello,> > I am sorry if this is appropriate but does anyon

Re: [PHP] first php 5 class

On Jan 30, 2008 1:29 PM, Greg Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ruby has 7 frameworks that I know of: Nitro, IOWA, Ramaze, Cerise, > Ruby on Rails, Merb and Camping. > http://www.nitroproject.org/ > http://enigo.com/projects/iowa/ > http://ramaze.net/ > http://cerise.rubyforge.org/ > http://www.r

Re: [PHP] first php 5 class

On Jan 30, 2008 12:40 PM, Nathan Nobbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > just pointing out that the rails guys dont have much wiggle room. > surely, youre familiar w/ this post: > http://www.oreillynet.com/ruby/blog/2007/09/7_reasons_i_switched_back_to_p_1.html One article from one developer means what

Re: [PHP] first php 5 class

On Jan 30, 2008 2:38 PM, Greg Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you like Java then stick with PHP as that's where the syntax is > clearly headed: > > http://www.php.net/~helly/php/ext/spl/ ive been studying spl a lot recently. actually, last night i was benching it against foreach over stand

Re: [PHP] first php 5 class

On Jan 30, 2008 1:36 PM, Eric Butera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for your post. Competition is a good thing. I agree. PHP is the reason we're not all still working out of a cgi-bin. > Have you looked at the PHPUnit code coverage reports? Of course it > isn't built in like you say, whic

Re: [PHP] first php 5 class

On Jan 30, 2008 2:33 PM, Greg Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 30, 2008 12:40 PM, Nathan Nobbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > just pointing out that the rails guys dont have much wiggle room. > > surely, youre familiar w/ this post: > > http://www.oreillynet.com/ruby/blog/2007/09/7_reason

Re: [PHP] first php 5 class

On Jan 30, 2008 12:40 PM, Nathan Nobbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > java is awesome, it just hasnt worked out for me career wise. If you like Java then stick with PHP as that's where the syntax is clearly headed: http://www.php.net/~helly/php/ext/spl/ -- Greg Donald http://destiney.com/ -- P

Re: [PHP] first php 5 class

On Jan 30, 2008 2:01 PM, Greg Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 30, 2008 12:15 PM, Zoltán Németh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > It's opinionated software and is certainly not for everyone. > > > > ok it's not for everyone, certainly not for me. but what is it from your > > point of view

Re: [PHP] first php 5 class

On Jan 30, 2008 2:55 PM, Greg Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you only need to test data integrity then it seems good enough. I > would argue that being able to test xhr requests is a basic > requirement at this stage in web development. how exactly do you test an xhr request? my suspicion

Re: [PHP] first php 5 class

On 1/30/08, Nathan Nobbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 30, 2008 2:38 PM, Greg Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If you like Java then stick with PHP as that's where the syntax is > > clearly headed: > > > > http://www.php.net/~helly/php/ext/spl/ > > ive been studying spl a lot recently.

Re: [PHP] first php 5 class

On 1/30/08, Nathan Nobbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 30, 2008 2:55 PM, Greg Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If you only need to test data integrity then it seems good enough. I > > would argue that being able to test xhr requests is a basic > > requirement at this stage in web develo

Re: [PHP] first php 5 class

On Jan 30, 2008 3:11 PM, Greg Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think your perception is correct. But Perl is very powerful too, > and not so many people use it for new web development either.. with > list serve traffic being my reference. > > SPL's main drawback for me personally is carpal tu

Re: [PHP] first php 5 class

On Jan 30, 2008 3:22 PM, Greg Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > An xhr request needs to be tested to see if your javascript fired when > expected and equally important what was sent back, and did what was > sent back land in the DOM where you expected it to. Rails provides > that and much more.

Re: [PHP] first php 5 class

On Jan 30, 2008 3:34 PM, Greg Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1/30/08, Nathan Nobbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > what id like to know, since you seem to know so much about the ruby on > > rails framework, > > is, what sort of debugging support is there? this is a weak spot in > > php to b

Re: [PHP] first php 5 class

On Jan 30, 2008 4:08 PM, Greg Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1/30/08, Nathan Nobbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > php has an interactive shell; php -a. > > therein you have access to anything in the language your > > include path, or the local disc. > > You obviously have a very different u

Re: [PHP] first php 5 class

On 1/30/08, Nathan Nobbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > what id like to know, since you seem to know so much about the ruby on > rails framework, > is, what sort of debugging support is there? this is a weak spot in > php to be sure. ive > tried multiple clients w/ xdebug w/ marginal success at thi

Re: [PHP] first php 5 class

On 1/30/08, Nathan Nobbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > php has an interactive shell; php -a. > therein you have access to anything in the language your > include path, or the local disc. You obviously have a very different understanding of the word "interactive". `php -a` seems pretty broken to me

Re: [PHP] first php 5 class

On 1/30/08, Nathan Nobbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > up arrow works just fine. history is gone if it crashes, but > if you exit gracefully, eg. with quit, then the history will be there. > maybe youre using debian or some other silly os; i run gentoo Gentoo is a damn fun distro I must admit.. b

[PHP] first php 5 class

On 2008-01-30 18:29:57 Greg Donald wrote: -snip- > > http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/gp4/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=all > That benchmark doesn't include Ruby 1.9. Now that the benchmarks game homepage http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/ includes an A to Z list of language implementations you s

Re: [PHP] Sum of results

On Wed, January 30, 2008 12:58 am, Dax Solomon Umaming wrote: > Hi; > > I've tried Googling this out but failed to search for an answer to > this, so > I'm posting to this list. I'd like to know if there's a way to get the > sum > this results: > > // Results > Individual Daily Consumption > //Ac

Re: [PHP] We need PHP/LAMP Developers and Programmers in FL, MD, VA,NY, DC, CA, MA!!!!

Hello, on 01/30/2008 01:52 PM PHP Employer said the following: > We need PHP/LAMP Developers and Programmers in FL, MD, VA, NY, DC, CA, MA > > World NetMedia is a world class leader in the development of multimedia > internet sites. We are seeking highly motivated individuals who eat, breath,

Re: [PHP] first php 5 class

On Wed, January 30, 2008 10:43 am, Nathan Nobbe wrote: > On Jan 30, 2008 11:38 AM, Greg Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> If list traffic is any sign, PHP is indeed slowing down from the >> "new >> peeps wanting to learn it" perspective: >> >> http://marc.info/?l=php-general&w=2 > > > interest

Re: [PHP] How can I do this -- method chaining

On Wed, January 30, 2008 9:53 am, Stut wrote: > The "forcing it out of scope" was the crux of my point. However, if > Jochem is right then it's kinda pointless with the current > implementation of the GC, but may become relevant in the new GC. I dunno about the OOP instances getting GC'ed, but PHP

Re: [PHP] Timeout while waiting for a server->client transfer to start (large files)

On Tue, January 29, 2008 12:45 pm, Barney Tramble wrote: > I have a script that I am trying to figure out to allow a remote file > to > be sent to a client's browser. It works ok for small files, but it > keeps > timing out for large files. I don't think it should even take as long > as > it does (

Re: [PHP] How can I do this -- method chaining

I dunno about the OOP instances getting GC'ed, but PHP *definitely* reclaims memory from arrays and strings as they go out of scope, usually. Does anyone else find that funny? :) It definitely does it ... usually ;) -- Postgresql & php tutorials http://www.designmagick.com/ -- PHP General

Re: [PHP] first php 5 class

On Wed, January 30, 2008 1:33 pm, Greg Donald wrote: > On Jan 30, 2008 12:40 PM, Nathan Nobbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> just pointing out that the rails guys dont have much wiggle room. >> surely, youre familiar w/ this post: >> http://www.oreillynet.com/ruby/blog/2007/09/7_reasons_i_switched_b

Re: [PHP] How can I do this -- method chaining

I believe the constructor returns the object created, with no chance in userland code of altering that fact, over-riding the return value, or any other jiggery-pokery to that effect. New causes the constructor to be called in the first place, and that's about it. The assignment to a variable is d

Re: [PHP] How can I do this -- method chaining

On Wed, January 30, 2008 6:19 pm, Chris wrote: > >> I dunno about the OOP instances getting GC'ed, but PHP *definitely* >> reclaims memory from arrays and strings as they go out of scope, >> usually. > > Does anyone else find that funny? :) > > It definitely does it ... usually ;) Ah well. It d

Re: [PHP] How can I do this -- method chaining

Richard Lynch wrote: On Wed, January 30, 2008 6:19 pm, Chris wrote: I dunno about the OOP instances getting GC'ed, but PHP *definitely* reclaims memory from arrays and strings as they go out of scope, usually. Does anyone else find that funny? :) It definitely does it ... usually ;) Ah well

Re: [PHP] How can I do this -- method chaining

Richard Lynch schreef: I believe the constructor returns the object created, with no chance in userland code of altering that fact, over-riding the return value, or any other jiggery-pokery to that effect. New causes the constructor to be called in the first place, and that's about it. The assi

Re: [PHP] Another question about functions...

On Tue, January 29, 2008 1:39 pm, Jason Pruim wrote: > Okay, so I checked everything I can think of, and it's still > downloading it as an application which means it's downloading the > entire website instead of just the data from the database... Anyone > have any idea what to check? Can you expla

Re: [PHP] first php 5 class

On Wed, January 30, 2008 1:44 pm, Nathan Nobbe wrote: > when you said earlier that people arent interested in learning > php, this is something i immediately thought of. primarily > because spl debuted in php 5.0 and practically nobody is > using it (which could just be my skewed perception) when

Re: [PHP] Handle time-outs and errors with file()

On Tue, January 29, 2008 9:58 am, John Papas wrote: > I'm using file() to get the contents of a remote page in my script but > I cannot find any information regarding how I could *gracefully* > handle a broken network connection or even a time-out (slow > connection). > > Is there a way? > > ---

Re: [PHP] Framed & Linked Content

On Tue, January 29, 2008 9:21 am, Mike Potter wrote: > There is JavaScript out there, to make a page break out of frames if > someone else has your page in a frame of theirs. > Is it possible to do this with PHP or is that the wrong side of > Server/Client-side operations? PHP is the wrong side of

Re: [PHP] Framed & Linked Content

On Tue, January 29, 2008 10:32 am, Per Jessen wrote: > Robert Cummings wrote: > >> The only remedy agaonst remote linking is to embed some kind of >> expiration in the link that accesses the document. > > Wouldn't a check of the REFERER field be enough to disable most remote > links? (I know it

Re: [PHP] Framed & Linked Content

The only remedy agaonst remote linking is to embed some kind of expiration in the link that accesses the document. Wouldn't a check of the REFERER field be enough to disable most remote links? (I know it is easily forged.) Normal users also use browsers which choose not to send i

Re: [PHP] first php 5 class

Greg Donald schreef: On Jan 30, 2008 1:36 PM, Eric Butera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks for your post. Competition is a good thing. I agree. PHP is the reason we're not all still working out of a cgi-bin. Have you looked at the PHPUnit code coverage reports? Of course it isn't built i

Re: [PHP] curl timeout vs socket timeout

On Mon, January 28, 2008 3:56 pm, Ravi Menon wrote: > 1) curl: > > . > . > curl_setopt( $handle, CURLOPT_TIMEOUT, 1 ); > . > . > $resp = curl_exec($handle) > > > 2) sockets: > > stream_set_timeout( $sock, 1); This is only for AFTER you've already opened up the socket. If you want a timeout on the

Re: [PHP] php embeded in html after first submit html disappear

is it possible to use "input type="hidden" for signkey form and put it in the register form before the submit button? I'm not sure but is it possible to use hidden to make this work? Thanks. On Jan 30, 2008 3:16 AM, Jochem Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Janet N schreef: > > Hi there, > > > >

RE: [PHP] determine file-upload's tmp-filename

Your first line of PHP code does not execute until PHP finishes accepting the whole file... On Mon, January 28, 2008 2:34 pm, Mr Webber wrote: > > This is the info available to upload scripts > > I have not done this, but am inspired to do it now. My design is to > develop > my own meter by compa

Re: [PHP] php embeded in html after first submit html disappear

Janet N schreef: is it possible to use "input type="hidden" for signkey form and put it in the register form before the submit button? I'm not sure but is it possible to use hidden to make this work? what are you trying to do? do you want to have people fill in both forms at once then process

Re: [PHP] Re: disable referer ? (was: Framed & Linked Content)

On Tue, January 29, 2008 10:55 am, Per Jessen wrote: > Robert Cummings wrote: > >> Referer value is completely worthless. Many people completely >> disable >> it-- such as myself :) > > But most people probably don't - 'coz most don't know how to edit e.g. > the firefox config. > > What is the purp

Re: [PHP] Re: disable referer ? (was: Framed & Linked Content)

On Tue, January 29, 2008 12:48 pm, Per Jessen wrote: > Robert Cummings wrote: > >> Actually, now you made me think on it... the primary reason I >> disable >> referrer logging is because it will also pass along lovely >> information >> such as any session ID embedded in the URL. So if you happen to

Re: [PHP] Best Approach

it aint PHP ... but I've just fall in love with this: http://www.capify.org/ which won't help if any of the servers in question are windows boxes unless you can install cygwin on there (I'm guessing that would allow it to work). although from reading your post I gather you have to perform the tas

Re: [PHP] how dod you get to do multiple mysql queries concurrently?

On Mon, January 28, 2008 12:37 pm, Per Jessen wrote: > Richard Lynch wrote: > >> On Sat, January 26, 2008 3:45 am, Per Jessen wrote: >>> Nathan Rixham wrote: >>> Back on the mysql side of things, try using geometry columns rather than numerical primary keys, with spatial indexes.. it's a MA

Re: [PHP] Re: how do you get to do multiple mysql queries concurrently?

On Mon, January 28, 2008 2:52 pm, Per Jessen wrote: > True again. However, I was commenting on your assertion that "Process > forking has EVERYTHING to do with thread safety", which I will stay is > wrong. When you fork another process, you don't need to worry about > whether your code is thread-s

RE: [PHP] We need PHP/LAMP Developers and Programmers in FL, MD, VA,NY, DC, CA, MA!!!!

No, but we will. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Manuel Lemos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 6:44 PM To: PHP Employer Cc: php-general@lists.php.net Subject: Re: [PHP] We need PHP/LAMP Developers and Programmers in FL, MD, VA,NY, DC, CA, MA Hello,

Re: [PHP] php embeded in html after first submit html disappear

Hi Jochem, Thanks for the prompt response. No I do not want people to fill in both forms at once. I actually have a three step process. I simplified it to two because if I can get two steps to work, I should be good to go. Each step depends on the preceding step having completed successfully.

Re: [PHP] first php 5 class

On Jan 30, 2008 8:21 PM, Jochem Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Greg's my hero of the day - even if he has been banging the Ruby drum on > the PHP Stage half the night ;-) greg does seem to know a crap-ton about ruby, and gentoo even ;) > one thing I would offer as a solution to rolling out cod

Re: [PHP] first php 5 class

On Jan 30, 2008 7:58 PM, Richard Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't use SPL because it makes my head spin to read it, and I never > ever try to do something as silly as iterate over a *LARGE* array in > end-user pages. are there pages where you iterate over the same 'small' array more than

Re: [PHP] first php 5 class

Nathan Nobbe schreef: On Jan 30, 2008 8:21 PM, Jochem Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Greg's my hero of the day - even if he has been banging the Ruby drum on the PHP Stage half the night ;-) greg does seem to know a crap-ton about ruby, and gentoo even ;) one thing I would offer as a soluti

Re: [PHP] first php 5 class

On Jan 30, 2008 10:58 PM, Jochem Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > besides being a nightmare, portage doesn't answer the question of rolling out > stuff > to multiple machines simultaneously. portage is one of the most elegant software distribution mechanisms ever created. and you dont have to ha

  1   2   >