Re: [PHP] Just to prove my point (used to be -> Re: [PHP] People's misbehavior on the list)

Tijnema wrote: On 5/19/07, Jim Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jim Lucas wrote: > PHP Developer wrote: >> some people don't remove the "Re:" prefix when answering to the >> questions It opens a new topic on the list and that's not appropriate >> . Thank ya >> >>-

Re: [PHP] Just to prove my point (used to be -> Re: [PHP] People's misbehavior on the list)

Jim Lucas wrote: Mostly what happens to my GMail account, is that it groups messages together, that truly have nothing to do with each other. Now THIS is what I would consider fantastic, loads of fun... Have they trademarked it yet? -- H | It's not a bug - it's an undocumented feature. +-

[PHP] Re: php5 cert

I know someone who easily passed PHP4, but never made it on PHP5, so don't expect the same level of questions. -- itoctopus - http://www.itoctopus.com ""Greg Donald"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Anyone wanna share their insights into the php5 cert test? The ph

Re: [PHP] People's misbehavior on the list

On 5/19/07, Richard S. Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Friday 18 May 2007 15:25:35 Tijnema wrote: > function sighRelief() { > return "Thank fucking God!"; > } > ?> > > Saves you some time, and resources Yeah, but where's the fun in that? Oh yeah, it saves you also the fun. Let me say i

Re: [PHP] Just to prove my point (used to be -> Re: [PHP] People's misbehavior on the list)

On 5/19/07, Jim Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Tijnema wrote: > On 5/19/07, Jim Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Jim Lucas wrote: >> > PHP Developer wrote: >> >> some people don't remove the "Re:" prefix when answering to the >> >> questions It opens a new topic on the list and that's not ap

Re: [PHP] Just to prove my point (used to be -> Re: [PHP] People's misbehavior on the list)

Tijnema wrote: On 5/19/07, Jim Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Tijnema wrote: > On 5/19/07, Jim Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Jim Lucas wrote: >> > PHP Developer wrote: >> >> some people don't remove the "Re:" prefix when answering to the >> >> questions It opens a new topic on the list a

Re: [PHP] Just to prove my point (used to be -> Re: [PHP] People's misbehavior on the list)

On 5/19/07, Jim Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Tijnema wrote: > On 5/19/07, Jim Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Tijnema wrote: >> > On 5/19/07, Jim Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Jim Lucas wrote: >> >> > PHP Developer wrote: >> >> >> some people don't remove the "Re:" prefix when an

Re: [PHP] Security Question, re directory permissions

But, SSH and telnet, etc. require authentication login-in and all the executables you mentioned [and others] require someone who has access to upload a harmful file to start with. Right? Once they are in there, they can do anything they please anyhow. Al. Tijnema ! wrote: On 5/18/07,

Re: [PHP] Security Question, re directory permissions

On 5/19/07, Al <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: But, SSH and telnet, etc. require authentication login-in and all the executables you mentioned [and others] require someone who has access to upload a harmful file to start with. Right? Once they are in there, they can do anything they please anyhow.

Re: [PHP] Security Question, re directory permissions

How can anyone, other than the staff, get into my site? Far as I know, other users can't get out of their own domain space and into mine. Tijnema wrote: On 5/19/07, Al <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: But, SSH and telnet, etc. require authentication login-in and all the executables you mentioned [a

RE: [PHP] People's misbehavior on the list

On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 16:42 -0500, Jay Blanchard wrote: > [snip] > ...some really funny and other not so funny stuff > [/snip] > > It Must Be Friday [tm] We're implementing a new system to help lighten up the list. It's called "Casual Post Fridays" (tm), where posts can be loosely, or quite p

Re: [PHP] Security Question, re directory permissions

On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 20:16 -0400, Al wrote: > How can anyone, other than the staff, get into my site? Far as I know, other > users can't get out of their own domain > space and into mine. Bugs in your code, bugs in third-party code, bugs in PHP itself, sometimes they can be abused to take adva

Re: [PHP] Security Question, re directory permissions

On 5/19/07, Al <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: How can anyone, other than the staff, get into my site? Far as I know, other users can't get out of their own domain space and into mine. That's quite easy, especially when you have SSH access. Of course, it will only work with specific settings, and

Re: [PHP] Security Question, re directory permissions

I guess your comment "The less secure everything else is." is the best answer. I'm developing a CMS where logged-in, selected users can create new directories and pages in them. I'm comfortable that my code is secure. I'm using php's ftp functions, with good security, to mkdir and create

Re: [PHP] Security Question, re directory permissions

I'm genuinely interested to know with whom you're hosting... -- itoctopus - http://www.itoctopus.com "Tijnema" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On 5/19/07, Al <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> How can anyone, other than the staff, get into my site? Far as I know, >> ot

[PHP] Re: PHP5 Static functions called through __call() that don't exist... yet

Hi all, Here is more code, with a test case included. What I would prefer to do is call TypeAssist::$string(), instead of TypeAssist::$a->string(). Or at least __construct() the $a object. $method; } public static function assertStandardTypes($para) { $r = TypeAssert::g

Re: [PHP] php5 cert

This one time, at band camp, "Greg Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anyone wanna share their insights into the php5 cert test? As worthless as the php4 cert. Kevin -- "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote."

<    1   2