Re: Re[2]: [PHP] Re: php security books

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED](Richard Davey) wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > Wednesday, July 4, 2007, 4:23:38 PM, you wrote: > Avoid the O'Reilly one as it is flawed. >>>In what way? >> Its written by Chris Shiflett, isn't that enough reason? > No, not really. T

Re[2]: [PHP] Re: php security books

Hi Andrew, Wednesday, July 4, 2007, 4:23:38 PM, you wrote: >>> Avoid the O'Reilly one as it is flawed. >> In what way? > Its written by Chris Shiflett, isn't that enough reason? No, not really. The errata are clearly published online, and while you could argue that some of them shouldn't ha