Re[2]: [PHP] How to argue with ASP people...

2005-01-04 Thread Ron Clark
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Richard Davey wrote: > Hello John, > > Tuesday, January 4, 2005, 2:52:27 PM, you wrote: > > JN> Standard comment in HTML, but it has another use with Apache, and I > JN> didn't find any reference to this type of syntax for ASP. > > > > and > > > > are both perfectly valid A

Re[2]: [PHP] How to argue with ASP people...

2005-01-04 Thread Richard Davey
Hello Richard, Tuesday, January 4, 2005, 5:28:18 PM, you wrote: RL> You can't do: RL> include "/known/safe/path/$whatever.asp" RL> and have it pull in ASP and evaluate it. Actually, you can. RL> and you don't have enough money to make me use it again. Likewise, I have no intentions of using A

Re[2]: [PHP] How to argue with ASP people...

2005-01-04 Thread Richard Davey
Hello John, Tuesday, January 4, 2005, 4:32:13 PM, you wrote: JN> But, is actually calling the JN> file from the ASP script like include() and require() will do in PHP? Yes. We used to split all of our ASP projects up this way - a class includes for the database abstraction, one for templating,

Re[2]: [PHP] How to argue with ASP people...

2005-01-04 Thread Richard Davey
Hello John, Tuesday, January 4, 2005, 2:52:27 PM, you wrote: JN> Standard comment in HTML, but it has another use with Apache, and I JN> didn't find any reference to this type of syntax for ASP. and are both perfectly valid ASP syntax that will work on **IIS** Obviously you can do the usua

Re[2]: [PHP] How to argue with ASP people...

2004-12-31 Thread Richard Davey
Hello John, Friday, December 31, 2004, 8:14:31 AM, you wrote: JH> This is basic HTTP and ASP has to play by the same rules. If you JH> can have output before Response.Redirect, then ASP is just doing JH> the buffering for you before it sends a Location header. Which is exactly what it does. It w