On 5/17/07, Richard Davey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Viruses? God, that old bullshit ladened chestnut*. At least come up
with some kind of valid OS argument, please.
1. The virus and malware protection racket - M$ spent billions of
dollars and several years making Vista and just like normal it'
On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 01:44 +0800, Crayon Shin Chan wrote:
> On Friday 18 May 2007 01:00, Richard Davey wrote:
>
> > Viruses? God, that old bullshit ladened chestnut*. At least come up
> > with some kind of valid OS argument, please. If you'd gone for
> > 'competent use of the CPU', or 'effective
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 13:13 -0400, Jason Pruim wrote:
> On May 17, 2007, at 1:00 PM, Richard Davey wrote:
>
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > Thursday, May 17, 2007, 5:49:45 PM, you wrote:
> >
> >>> Sure, but you're in the minority*, so what do I care? :)
> >
> >> I'm not asking you to care. Windoze still suc
On Friday 18 May 2007 01:00, Richard Davey wrote:
> Viruses? God, that old bullshit ladened chestnut*. At least come up
> with some kind of valid OS argument, please. If you'd gone for
> 'competent use of the CPU', or 'effective memory management', you'd be
> worth taking seriously.
In a roundabo
On 5/17/07, Richard Davey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Greg,
Thursday, May 17, 2007, 5:49:45 PM, you wrote:
>> Sure, but you're in the minority*, so what do I care? :)
> I'm not asking you to care. Windoze still sucks, no matter how many
> idiots use it. The virus protection racket alone i
On May 17, 2007, at 1:00 PM, Richard Davey wrote:
Hi Greg,
Thursday, May 17, 2007, 5:49:45 PM, you wrote:
Sure, but you're in the minority*, so what do I care? :)
I'm not asking you to care. Windoze still sucks, no matter how many
idiots use it. The virus protection racket alone is enou
6 matches
Mail list logo
