RE: Re: [PHP] PDF Functions

2001-02-15 Thread Mathias Meyer
> -Original Message- > From: Chris Carbaugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 1:39 AM > To: Mike Tuller; Michael Stearne > Cc: php mailing list > Subject: Re: Re: [PHP] PDF Functions > > Redhat's *.0 releases are known to be p

Re: Re: [PHP] PDF Functions

2001-02-14 Thread Chris Carbaugh
ller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Michael Stearne > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Cc: php mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: Re: [PHP] PDF Functions > > > > > > Well, first let me say that I'm kind of surprised I'm the only one > > try

Re: Re: [PHP] PDF Functions

2001-02-14 Thread Chris Carbaugh
Well, first let me say that I'm kind of surprised I'm the only one trying to help you guys out. It seems not many folk are into PHP/PDF? Any how, Redhat's *.0 releases are known to be problematic. They are usually pretty much bleading edge, meaning they're buggy. The last time I compiled PHP

Re: Re: [PHP] PDF Functions

2001-02-14 Thread Chris Carbaugh
Here's the steps I would take: ditch all those configure options except the ones needed to keep PDF functions working. Maybe even just ./configure --with-pdflib=/usr/local/lib, and test it out as a stand alone exec. If that fails, ditch the RPMs. Get the source for apache, php, pdflib, and wh