Zeev,
If you find that GUI tools are not overwhelmingly better for C++, Java product
development, that does weaken the case for php studios even more. Why so?
1. Conciseness of php
php is a high level application development tool so the code is, or at least,
should mostly consist of highly spe
FYI-
My two cents. I have been running the demo version since a day or two
after it was released. On Windows 2000 it has been solid as a rock. I
have not tried it on my XP laptop yet, but will soon.
Zend Studio is really helping to make PHP 'legitimate' in the
corporate world since it no
> The problems you were having with the server components of the studio
sound
> quite odd - can you elaborate on them? (probably off-list, it's best if
> you could submit a bug report about it through zend.com/store/pickup.php,
> evaluation support).
>
> This is water under the bridge now, but yo
At 19:53 18/02/2002, DL Neil wrote:
>Zeev,
>
>Didn't experience any stability problems with the beta per-se, but using a
>Windows box was an exercise in
>Unix-ification. Has the released version for Win32 seen significant
>alterations to the GUI?
I'm not sure which beta you've seen, but the GUI
ECTED]>
To: "Chris Lott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 18 February 2002 15:57
Subject: Re: [PHP] zend studio 2.0
> Chris,
>
> Stability improved *a lot* since the beta in December. Remember, it *was*
> a beta release, and like most betas, st
At 00:27 18/02/2002, robert janeczek wrote:
>hi
>i write in php about 1.5 years. from the beginning i use macromedia homesite
>and i`m quite content of it. but...debugger, environment not optimized for
>php developers etc. so i wanted to try zend studio, i downloaded it,
>installed (w2k, i already
Chris,
Stability improved *a lot* since the beta in December. Remember, it *was*
a beta release, and like most betas, stability was not perfect. It's quite
good now, and it also got a whole new (well, mostly new) code completion
engine which is really revolutionary for PHP.
I'm not objective
At 05:02 18/02/2002, Peter J. Schoenster wrote:
>Well, as you said, no point in arguing. Just that I think if someone
>really wants to develop they should learn some better tools than a
>GUI but it's a question of balance.
That's quite an arguable point. I don't code PHP but C++ and Java, and I
> Well, as you said, no point in arguing. Just that I think if someone
> really wants to develop they should learn some better tools than a
> GUI but it's a question of balance.
I think a definition of GUI might be in order. Homesite, for instance, is
just a big text editor. It has almost no GUI
On 17 Feb 2002, at 16:12, Chris Lott wrote:
> I hope we aren't going to get another chest-pounding "real coders"
> type of argument going here. Homesite *IS* a text editor. It provides
Yeah, my bad.
> an amazing number of shortcuts to tasks, including mouse-based tasks,
> many of which I guara
I hope we aren't going to get another chest-pounding "real coders" type of
argument going here. Homesite *IS* a text editor. It provides an amazing
number of shortcuts to tasks, including mouse-based tasks, many of which I
guarantee you I can get done faster with a mouse than anyone can typing. It
> Well I was hoping that article was interesting. It wasn't. I should
> have known when I saw the use of homesite as an alternative.
sure, it was just simple look at zend studio, but it made me wonder why the
tool didn`t work on my system :) [yes - i think i know what was wrong, no
need to look f
On at , Unknown wrote:
> i write in php about 1.5 years. from the beginning i use macromedia
> homesite and i`m quite content of it. but...debugger, environment not
> optimized for php developers etc. so i wanted to try zend studio, i
> i`ve read this
> (http://www.byte.com/documents/s=6975/by
13 matches
Mail list logo
