> > Having all the function bodies in the same file would cause php to have
> > to parse all
> > of that code, probably about 3-4000 lines causing awful slowdowns. And
> > the reason to define all of
> > the functions in one file, is so that we can include that file, and all
> > the functions are
Hi Richard!
On Thu, 05 Jul 2001, Richard Heyes wrote:
> > If you are talking about speed, opening a file is expensive
> > because it is a kernel call, a directory search and all that.
> > Your "some big code" in-line will beat it every time...
>
> Not in my experience. I have a file which define
> But, my friend, if you include that file, PHP _still_ has
> to parse it. You just didn't benchmark. No matter what
Actually, I did do benchmarks, you simply didn't understand correctly.
Not all of the functions are used on every page. So if I were to include
all the functions in one file, rou
Nick Davies wrote:
>
> surely the include function only "pastes" the contents of the included
> file into the point where the include statement occours. Php still has to
> parse it all.
---
Right, and so no matter what, you still have the extra cost
of the file operation, something almost a magn
But, my friend, if you include that file, PHP _still_ has
to parse it. You just didn't benchmark. No matter what
will beat
because of the addition of the call to the kernel. You
cannot get around this.
Richard Heyes wrote:
>
> > If you are talking about speed, opening a file is expensi
surely the include function only "pastes" the contents of the included
file into the point where the include statement occours. Php still has to
parse it all.
On Thu, 5 Jul 2001, Richard Heyes wrote:
> > If you are talking about speed, opening a file is expensive
> > because it is a kernel cal
> If you are talking about speed, opening a file is expensive
> because it is a kernel call, a directory search and all that.
> Your "some big code" in-line will beat it every time...
Not in my experience. I have a file which defines ~40 functions, with
the bodies
included when the function is ca
This depends upon what you mean by "effective". For administration
purposes, it may be that you want to include some "commen" code,
and therefore not rewrite reusable bits.
If you are talking about speed, opening a file is expensive
because it is a kernel call, a directory search and all that.
Y
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 02:29:12PM +0300, Adrian Ciutureanu wrote:
> Is any of the versions below more effective?
>
> /** Version 1 **/
> if($condition) {
> // some big code
> } else {
> // other big code
> }
> ?>
>
> /** Version 2 **/
> if($condition) {
>
9 matches
Mail list logo
