On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Sebastian Krebs wrote:
> 2012/11/17 Andrew Ballard
>
>> On Nov 16, 2012 10:24 PM, "tamouse mailing lists"
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Sebastian Krebs
>> wrote:
>> > > Beside this it can be rewritten as
>> > >
>> > > switch ((int) (($cou
2012/11/19 Tim Streater
> On 18 Nov 2012 at 14:44, Jim Giner wrote:
>
> > 2. Using Switch {ALWAYS FIRST CASE!!!}
> >
> > //$boxes = 1;
> > //switch ($count) {
> > //case ($count > 14):
> > //$boxes = 3;
> > //
On 19 Nov 2012, at 19:35, Tim Streater wrote:
> On 18 Nov 2012 at 14:44, Jim Giner wrote:
>
>> 2. Using Switch {ALWAYS FIRST CASE!!!}
>>
>> //$boxes = 1;
>> //switch ($count) {
>> //case ($count > 14):
>> //$boxes = 3;
>>
On 11/16/2012 8:33 PM, Iñigo Medina wrote:
On Fri, 16 Nov 2012, Jim Giner wrote:
On 11/16/2012 12:38 PM, Tim Streater wrote:
On 16 Nov 2012 at 12:10, Omar Muhsin wrote:
Hello,
I was just wondering after writting the code in version 2 here
below, it turns
out in testing that it actually PH
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Sebastian Krebs wrote:
> (Beside: Was "the principle of least surprise" not a ruby-thing? ;))
No, but the Ruby (and Rails) world takes concepts like this and really
runs with them.
Principle of Least Astonishment has been around for quite some time,
with examples
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Sebastian Krebs wrote:
> 2012/11/17 Andrew Ballard
>
>> On Nov 16, 2012 10:24 PM, "tamouse mailing lists"
>> wrote:
>> > Just a tad obscure for someone coming along
>> > later
>>
>> Without knowing the intent of the code, it could be a headache to maintain.
>>
>
2012/11/17 Andrew Ballard
> On Nov 16, 2012 10:24 PM, "tamouse mailing lists"
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Sebastian Krebs
> wrote:
> > > Beside this it can be rewritten as
> > >
> > > switch ((int) (($count-1) / 7) {
> > > case 0: // 1-7
> > > case 1: // 8 - 14
> > >
2012/11/17 Tim Streater
> On 17 Nov 2012 at 01:33, Iñigo Medina wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 16 Nov 2012, Jim Giner wrote:
>
> >> Maybe I'm way out of touch, but when I look at php.net for the syntax
> of the
> >> switch statement I see:
> >> switch($var){
> >> case (value):
> >> (do s
On Nov 16, 2012 10:24 PM, "tamouse mailing lists"
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Sebastian Krebs
wrote:
> > Beside this it can be rewritten as
> >
> > switch ((int) (($count-1) / 7) {
> > case 0: // 1-7
> > case 1: // 8 - 14
> > default: // above 15
> > }
>
> Nice code refacto
On 17 Nov 2012, at 10:53, Tim Streater wrote:
> On 17 Nov 2012 at 01:33, Iñigo Medina wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 16 Nov 2012, Jim Giner wrote:
>
>>> Maybe I'm way out of touch, but when I look at php.net for the syntax of the
>>> switch statement I see:
>>> switch($var){
>>> case (value):
>>>
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Sebastian Krebs wrote:
> Beside this it can be rewritten as
>
> switch ((int) (($count-1) / 7) {
> case 0: // 1-7
> case 1: // 8 - 14
> default: // above 15
> }
Nice code refactoring :) Just a tad obscure for someone coming along
later, perhaps.
--
PHP Ge
On Fri, 16 Nov 2012, Jim Giner wrote:
On 11/16/2012 12:38 PM, Tim Streater wrote:
On 16 Nov 2012 at 12:10, Omar Muhsin wrote:
Hello,
I was just wondering after writting the code in version 2 here below, it
turns
out in testing that it actually PHP is not validating the expressions
instea
2012/11/16 Tim Streater
> On 16 Nov 2012 at 12:10, Omar Muhsin wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I was just wondering after writting the code in version 2 here below, it
> turns
> > out in testing that it actually PHP is not validating the expressions
> instead
> > always I get the first case.
> >
> >
13 matches
Mail list logo
