Jochem Maas wrote:
Colin Guthrie schreef:
Lester Caine wrote:
Jochem - You not had the problem of M$ changing default font sizes in
different versions of windows? IT departments have enough problems
with INSTALLING an upgrade without asking them to CHANGE the font
size as well :)
The complain
Colin Guthrie schreef:
Lester Caine wrote:
Jochem - You not had the problem of M$ changing default font sizes in
different versions of windows? IT departments have enough problems
with INSTALLING an upgrade without asking them to CHANGE the font size
as well :)
The complaint from THIS site was
Colin Guthrie wrote:
Micah Gersten wrote:
In the Microsoft world, you only support the latest couple of OSs, so
IE7 won't run on Win2k.
What about FF, Opera, Chrome, Safari? Do *any* of those work? If not,
then it wouldn't take long to get one of them working if IE had a sunset
date in it. T
In the Microsoft world, you only support the latest couple of OSs, so
IE7 won't run on Win2k.
ank you,
Micah Gersten
onShore Networks
Internal Developer
http://www.onshore.com
Colin Guthrie wrote:
> Why do they need to upgrade the whole OS just to upgrade a browser
> who's sunset date has been
On Sep 11, 2008, at 8:53 AM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
Lester Caine wrote:
MOST of my council customers only have IE6 on their networks
although I was asked the question 'Does it run on IE7' only
recently. To which the answer is 'Yes - but all the font sizes are
too big!' Since the cost of rep
Lester Caine schreef:
Luke wrote:
yeah, make an official no-support date. That would be great- it would
help
with the whole IE6 problem.
It needs to be phased out, yet I know many companies that still haven't
upgraded to IE7 yet!
That's a big security problem as well as being a headache for a
Luke wrote:
yeah, make an official no-support date. That would be great- it would help
with the whole IE6 problem.
It needs to be phased out, yet I know many companies that still haven't
upgraded to IE7 yet!
That's a big security problem as well as being a headache for all of us...
MOST of my
yeah, make an official no-support date. That would be great- it would help
with the whole IE6 problem.
It needs to be phased out, yet I know many companies that still haven't
upgraded to IE7 yet!
That's a big security problem as well as being a headache for all of us...
2008/9/11 Colin Guthrie <
Michael McGlothlin wrote:
>[...] I think web developers
>should look into a class action case against Microsoft for failing to
>make their browser standards compliant - it sure costs us a lot extra in
>development time. :p
Let me know where the PayPal donate button is... DW & I are fed up with
I run VMWare Fusion on my iMac. I run Windows 2000 w/ IE6 and XP w/ IE7
in their own virtual machines. I haven't bothered with IE8 yet but will
probably try it in another copy of my XP virtual machine.
I'm sure as hell not going to pay Microsoft any more in licensing fees
to make stuff work in
Jochem Maas wrote:
>how do you handle licensing/activation in these VMs?
>I have parallels on my Mac and a 'proper' bootcamp install of WinXP
>which I need for work ... and I'm not about to screw with that install
>for the sake of testing another POS version of IE.
You need a license for each in
Ross McKay schreef:
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 13:03:18 +0100, "Richard Heyes" wrote:
I really don't want to install a beta (though I did install Chrome, so
maybe that should be "an MS beta") but I am interested in how it
performs.
That's what God invented the virtual machine for. Load up Windows XP
On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 11:48 +0100, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> Richard Heyes wrote:
> > Anyone using it?
>
> Do you mean Firefox, Chrome or Safari? All of these are Internet
> Explorer beaters
You forgot Opera you insensitive clod... it beats all 4!
Cheers,
Rob.
--
http://www.interjinn.com
Appl
> God
Who?
--
Richard Heyes
HTML5 Graphing for IE7, FF, Chrome, Opera and Safari:
http://www.phpguru.org/RGraph
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 13:03:18 +0100, "Richard Heyes" wrote:
>I really don't want to install a beta (though I did install Chrome, so
>maybe that should be "an MS beta") but I am interested in how it
>performs.
That's what God invented the virtual machine for. Load up Windows XP in
KVM, QEMU, Virtual
Sorry, but sarcasm doesn't quite come across email very effectively.
2008/9/8 Richard Heyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
>> I think he is asking whether people are using Internet Explore 8 Beta 2
>
> I am. That would be an obscure sense of humour.
>
>> No I'm not using it, I still haven't ugraded
Hi,
> I think he is asking whether people are using Internet Explore 8 Beta 2
I am. That would be an obscure sense of humour.
> No I'm not using it, I still haven't ugraded to IE7 yet, and probably
> won't while I use Firefox 3, and am quite happy with FF3.
I really don't want to install a beta
I think he is asking whether people are using Internet Explore 8 Beta 2
No I'm not using it, I still haven't ugraded to IE7 yet, and probably
won't while I use Firefox 3, and am quite happy with FF3.
Andrew
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php
18 matches
Mail list logo
