Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am 2008-05-28 08:40:09, schrieb Philip Thompson:
> > It's amazing how someone so involved in security would provide any of
> > this information. Name, job, location, phone numbers, Internet
> > contact. You might as well have given the name o
What a endless boring off topic thread...
I'm wondering if some day this one will finish and we will talk about
serious and relevant stuffs.
Some of you will tell me to simply don't read the thread... but what is
making me seek is the fact of this message always appear on top my email
list!
Ok, tha
At 11:01 AM -0400 5/13/08, Daniel Brown wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Shawn McKenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
My main pet peeve is when my wife leaves empty clothes hangers on door
knobs throughout the house.
Mine is when the pre-wife leaves her clothes on. So we're pre
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Shawn McKenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> My main pet peeve is when my wife leaves empty clothes hangers on door
> knobs throughout the house.
Mine is when the pre-wife leaves her clothes on. So we're pretty similar.
--
Dedicated Servers - Intel 2.4
Stut wrote:
On 12 May 2008, at 09:39, Peter Ford wrote:
tedd wrote:
Hi gang:
This is what I did this morning:
http://webbytedd.com/bb/tribute/
It speaks for itself.
Cheers,
tedd
tedd,
Nothing to do with the subject matter, but I noticed because it is one
of your more simple pages: I get a J
At 9:04 AM +0100 5/13/08, Peter Ford wrote:
I don't expect anyone to second-guess pet peeves :)
Why not? That's the way things change.
I still haven't had anyone address the concerns I posted. Instead, I
feel like a kid watching two others play a game of "keep-a-way" with
me in the middle.
2008/5/13 Stut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On 13 May 2008, at 10:32, Robin Vickery wrote:
>
> > 2008/5/13 Stut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > On 13 May 2008, at 09:04, Peter Ford wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > I think the onus is on the coders of Urchin to document how to avoid
> > > >
> > > errors when J
On 13 May 2008, at 10:32, Robin Vickery wrote:
2008/5/13 Stut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 13 May 2008, at 09:04, Peter Ford wrote:
I think the onus is on the coders of Urchin to document how to avoid
errors when Javascript is disabled, not the site developer who uses
it.
Just to repeat a poi
2008/5/13 Stut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 13 May 2008, at 09:04, Peter Ford wrote:
>
> > I think the onus is on the coders of Urchin to document how to avoid
> errors when Javascript is disabled, not the site developer who uses it.
> >
>
> Just to repeat a point I made yesterday which was clearly e
On 13 May 2008, at 09:04, Peter Ford wrote:
I think the onus is on the coders of Urchin to document how to avoid
errors when Javascript is disabled, not the site developer who uses
it.
Just to repeat a point I made yesterday which was clearly either
misunderstood or ignored... Urchin *will
tedd wrote:
At 3:11 PM -0400 5/12/08, Eric Butera wrote:
NoScript is a FireFox extension to protect users from malicious
scripts.
NoScript is also a tag for browsers to read and react to IF they do not
accept javascript.
http://www.w3schools.com/TAGS/tag_noscript.asp
That's an unfortunate
At 3:11 PM -0400 5/12/08, Eric Butera wrote:
NoScript is a FireFox extension to protect users from malicious
scripts.
NoScript is also a tag for browsers to read and react to IF they do
not accept javascript.
http://www.w3schools.com/TAGS/tag_noscript.asp
That's an unfortunate naming conve
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 2:57 PM, tedd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gentlemen:
>
> First, my apologies for publishing the page without checking it first for
> pet-peeves.
>
> Second, please educate me as to the statement that "NoScript" is blocking
> UrchinTracker. Where do I have declared NoScrip
Gentlemen:
First, my apologies for publishing the page without checking it first
for pet-peeves.
Second, please educate me as to the statement that "NoScript" is
blocking UrchinTracker. Where do I have declared NoScript and why
would I want it? I have numerous sites and they all generate the
This is a bit off-topic, but since Peter appears to have missed the
point of my post I feel I must reply. It may also be interesting to
the list.
On 12 May 2008, at 14:43, Peter Ford wrote:
Stut wrote:
On 12 May 2008, at 09:39, Peter Ford wrote:
tedd wrote:
Hi gang:
This is what I did thi
Stut wrote:
On 12 May 2008, at 09:39, Peter Ford wrote:
tedd wrote:
Hi gang:
This is what I did this morning:
http://webbytedd.com/bb/tribute/
It speaks for itself.
Cheers,
tedd
tedd,
Nothing to do with the subject matter, but I noticed because it is one
of your more simple pages: I get a J
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 6:31 AM, Stut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12 May 2008, at 09:39, Peter Ford wrote:
>
> > tedd wrote:
> >
> > > Hi gang:
> > > This is what I did this morning:
> > > http://webbytedd.com/bb/tribute/
> > > It speaks for itself.
> > > Cheers,
> > > tedd
> > >
> >
> > tedd,
On 12 May 2008, at 09:39, Peter Ford wrote:
tedd wrote:
Hi gang:
This is what I did this morning:
http://webbytedd.com/bb/tribute/
It speaks for itself.
Cheers,
tedd
tedd,
Nothing to do with the subject matter, but I noticed because it is
one of your more simple pages: I get a JS "urchinTra
18 matches
Mail list logo
