Hello,
Mark Charette wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Manuel Lemos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Before somebody decides to repress my opinion again,
>
> Hah! That's got to be one of the funniest things I've ever read!
>
> Downloads do not imply usage, only curiosity. I've do
BC was broken, this happens sometimes. The majority of the PHP Dev team
agrees that strtok() should be POSIX compliant, so it is now, and forever
will be.
Not being in NEWS/Changelog was an oversight/error, nobody is perfect.
This not happening in the future is a desire of everyone. Also, it'll
> -Original Message-
> From: Manuel Lemos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Before somebody decides to repress my opinion again,
Hah! That's got to be one of the funniest things I've ever read!
Downloads do not imply usage, only curiosity. I've downloaded a large number
of PHP class libraries
Hello,
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
>
> You call it broken, we call it finally making them POSIX-compliant.
> Whatever floats your boat.
I don't disagree, but the fact is that doesn't help anybody that used
the function and relied on its original behaviour that was there for 4
years.
As for being POS
You call it broken, we call it finally making them POSIX-compliant.
Whatever floats your boat.
-Rasmus
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Manuel Lemos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Alain Samoun wrote:
> >
> > Manuel:
> > What is broken with strtok() since php4.06? So far my code that use it seems
> > to work ok with P
5 matches
Mail list logo
