On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 21:45:58 +1000, David Tulloh wrote:
> Google Kreme wrote:
>> On 25 Sep 2006, at 06:11 , Sancar Saran wrote:
>> ...
>>
>> If this is generating hundred of K of HTML, use ' instead of "
>>
>> (yes, it's faster).
>>
>
> I've seen this stated several times and at first glance i
On Wed, September 27, 2006 3:37 am, Sancar Saran wrote:
> Thanks for supporting, because of approaching the problem I don't want
> to
> change generate once echo one style.
>
> And I found solution like this,
> I split variable into an array and generate loop for printing, mostly
> fix the
> probl
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: [PHP] Print or Echo takes lots of time
Date: Wednesday 27 September 2006 06:37
From: Børge Holen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wednesday 27 September 2006 01:46, Richard Lynch wrote:
> On Tue, September 26, 200
On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 18:46 -0500, Richard Lynch wrote:
> On Tue, September 26, 2006 6:35 pm, Curt Zirzow wrote:
> >> I wonder what would happen if you put your swap on a RAM disk?
> >
> > I actually have done this, it works like a charm :)
> >
> > you just have to ensure swap doesn't run out... of
On Tue, September 26, 2006 6:35 pm, Curt Zirzow wrote:
>> I wonder what would happen if you put your swap on a RAM disk?
>
> I actually have done this, it works like a charm :)
>
> you just have to ensure swap doesn't run out... of course i'd only
> recomend this on a dedicated machine for like fir
On 9/26/06, Richard Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, September 26, 2006 12:16 pm, Børge Holen wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 September 2006 02:07, Robert Cummings wrote:
>> On Mon, 2006-09-25 at 17:39 -0600, Google Kreme wrote:
>> > I'm sitting here with 4 Gigs of RAM trying to figure out how to
On Tue, September 26, 2006 12:16 pm, Børge Holen wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 September 2006 02:07, Robert Cummings wrote:
>> On Mon, 2006-09-25 at 17:39 -0600, Google Kreme wrote:
>> > I'm sitting here with 4 Gigs of RAM trying to figure out how to
>> use
>> > it all... :-) (Me, in 2005)
>>
>> Not real
On Mon, September 25, 2006 7:11 am, Sancar Saran wrote:
> When I was check the performance of my system I found interesting
> resuts.
>
> My code stores html output into a variable. When page creation
> complete I
> printed out the variable.
>
> Problem was generation html code takes 0.5 second and
On Tuesday 26 September 2006 02:07, Robert Cummings wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-09-25 at 17:39 -0600, Google Kreme wrote:
> > I'm sitting here with 4 Gigs of RAM trying to figure out how to use
> > it all... :-) (Me, in 2005)
>
> Not really related to the post... but I find a good way to eat up 4 gigs
>
Google Kreme wrote:
> On 25 Sep 2006, at 06:11 , Sancar Saran wrote:
> ...
>
> If this is generating hundred of K of HTML, use ' instead of "
>
> (yes, it's faster).
>
I've seen this stated several times and at first glance it seems to make
sense. The double quoted version has all the \n and r
On Mon, 2006-09-25 at 17:39 -0600, Google Kreme wrote:
> I'm sitting here with 4 Gigs of RAM trying to figure out how to use
> it all... :-) (Me, in 2005)
Not really related to the post... but I find a good way to eat up 4 gigs
of RAM is to run several VMWare nodes :) Depending on what these n
On 25 Sep 2006, at 06:11 , Sancar Saran wrote:
$strPage = " yada dayda";
...
$strPage.= " another html tags";
...
$strPage.= getSqlDataAndCreateSomeHtmlCOde();
If this is generating hundred of K of HTML, use ' instead of "
(yes, it's faster).
--
I'm sitting here with 4 Megs of RAM trying to
12 matches
Mail list logo