On Thu, October 27, 2005 9:56 pm, Chris wrote:
> Though I suppose you could make an argument for using expressions that
> consist of only constant values.
Actually...
One could argue that so long as the programmer was willing to accept
the consequences, there could be many legitimate circumstance
Dragan Stanojevic - Nevidljivi wrote:
Jasper Bryant-Greene wrote:
On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 01:02 +0200, Dragan Stanojevic - Nevidljivi wrote:
[snip]
and it works fine, I cannot define a constant by expression, like:
class Foo {
const AAA = 1 << 0;
const BBB = 1 << 1;
const CCC = 1 <
Jasper Bryant-Greene wrote:
On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 01:02 +0200, Dragan Stanojevic - Nevidljivi wrote:
[snip]
and it works fine, I cannot define a constant by expression, like:
class Foo {
const AAA = 1 << 0;
const BBB = 1 << 1;
const CCC = 1 << 2;
const DDD = 1 << 3;
}
Well now,
On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 01:02 +0200, Dragan Stanojevic - Nevidljivi wrote:
[snip]
> and it works fine, I cannot define a constant by expression, like:
>
> class Foo {
> const AAA = 1 << 0;
> const BBB = 1 << 1;
> const CCC = 1 << 2;
> const DDD =1 << 3;
> }
>
> Well now, is this a b
4 matches
Mail list logo
