On Sat, February 10, 2007 3:19 pm, pub wrote:
> To all PHP experts,
>
> Do any of you also know how to play bridge?
> If yes, which do you think is harder to learn, PHP or bridge?
Bridge is way more harder to learn.
Especially all those weird bidding conventions with no rationale.
--
Some peopl
At 1:19 PM -0800 2/10/07, pub wrote:
To all PHP experts,
Do any of you also know how to play bridge?
I'm sure someone does.
If yes, which do you think is harder to learn, PHP or bridge?
I don't know, I don't play bridge.
tedd
--
---
http://sperling.com http://ancientstones.com http
At 2/10/2007 01:19 PM, pub wrote:
Do any of you also know how to play bridge?
If yes, which do you think is harder to learn, PHP or bridge?
I don't think learning is so generalizable.
In my experience, motivation has a lot to do with how easy things are
to learn. If you're excited or passio
al Message
From: Kenn Murrah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: pub <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: PHP General List
Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2007 3:57:03 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP] PHP or Bridge (card game)
pub wrote:
> which do you think is harder to learn, PHP or bridge?
>
Well, PHP *can* be a
pub wrote:
which do you think is harder to learn, PHP or bridge?
Well, PHP *can* be a lot more complicated, but at least it's more or
less predictable, and I've RARELY had a bridge partner that played the
game predictably and consistently
kennM
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.p
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2007-02-10 13:19:02 -0800:
> Do any of you also know how to play bridge?
> If yes, which do you think is harder to learn, PHP or bridge?
I don't play bridge, but both things are languages. Presumably the one
with bigger grammar is more complicated. But syntax is just one ax
What an odd question
Personally PHP makes much more sense to me then the many variations of
bridge...
http://www.ouradoptionblog.com
Join our journey of adoption
http://www.thelonecoder.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
continuing the struggle against bad code
*/
?>
> From: pub <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
7 matches
Mail list logo