Re: [PHP] OT A public apology to Larry Garfield

2007-08-07 Thread tedd
At 11:35 AM -0400 8/7/07, Robert Cummings wrote: On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 11:28 -0400, Daniel Brown wrote: On 8/7/07, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 11:15 -0400, Daniel Brown wrote: > > > > Bah just busting your balls anyway, old man! ;-P > > > >

RE: [PHP] OT A public apology to Larry Garfield

2007-08-07 Thread Robert Cummings
On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 18:42 +0100, Ford, Mike wrote: > On 07 August 2007 16:15, Daniel Brown wrote: > > > On 8/7/07, tedd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi gang: > > There should be a comma prior to the addressee(s). > > > > > > > > In the long winded debate over copyright infringement vs thie

RE: [PHP] OT A public apology to Larry Garfield

2007-08-07 Thread Ford, Mike
On 07 August 2007 16:15, Daniel Brown wrote: > On 8/7/07, tedd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi gang: > There should be a comma prior to the addressee(s). > > > > > In the long winded debate over copyright infringement vs thievery, I > > made an unkind and untrue inference re Larry Garfield. >

Re: [PHP] OT A public apology to Larry Garfield

2007-08-07 Thread Daniel Brown
On 8/7/07, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 11:15 -0400, Daniel Brown wrote: > > > > Bah just busting your balls anyway, old man! ;-P > > > > An ellipsis should be comprised of 3 dots. > > :B > > Cheers, > Rob. > -- > ..

Re: [PHP] OT A public apology to Larry Garfield

2007-08-07 Thread Daniel Brown
On 8/7/07, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 11:28 -0400, Daniel Brown wrote: > > On 8/7/07, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 11:15 -0400, Daniel Brown wrote: > > > > > > > > Bah just busting your balls anyway, old man!

Re: [PHP] OT A public apology to Larry Garfield

2007-08-07 Thread Robert Cummings
On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 11:28 -0400, Daniel Brown wrote: > On 8/7/07, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 11:15 -0400, Daniel Brown wrote: > > > > > > Bah just busting your balls anyway, old man! ;-P > > > > > > > An ellipsis should be comprised of 3 dots. >

Re: [PHP] OT A public apology to Larry Garfield

2007-08-07 Thread Robert Cummings
On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 11:15 -0400, Daniel Brown wrote: > > Bah just busting your balls anyway, old man! ;-P > An ellipsis should be comprised of 3 dots. :B Cheers, Rob. -- ... SwarmBuy.com - http://www.swarmbuy.com Leveragin

Re: [PHP] OT A public apology to Larry Garfield

2007-08-07 Thread Daniel Brown
On 8/7/07, tedd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi gang: There should be a comma prior to the addressee(s). > > In the long winded debate over copyright infringement vs thievery, I > made an unkind and untrue inference re Larry Garfield. You forgot to hyphenate "long-winded"; "Copyright" is a title a

Re: [PHP] OT A public apology to Larry Garfield

2007-08-07 Thread Borokov Smith
Personally, I think Garfield is the worst comic in existence no matter how Larry Garfield feels about it ! greetz, boro tedd schreef: Hi gang: In the long winded debate over copyright infringement vs thievery, I made an unkind and untrue inference re Larry Garfield. So, as a matter of pub

Re: [PHP] OT A public apology to Larry Garfield

2007-08-07 Thread Robert Cummings
On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 10:50 -0400, tedd wrote: > At 10:31 AM -0400 8/7/07, Robert Cummings wrote: > >On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 10:23 -0400, tedd wrote: > >> Hi gang: > >> > >> In the long winded debate over copyright infringement vs thievery, I > >> made an unkind and untrue inference re Larry Garfi

Re: [PHP] OT A public apology to Larry Garfield

2007-08-07 Thread David Giragosian
On 8/7/07, tedd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > At 10:36 AM -0400 8/7/07, Daniel Brown wrote: > > > > As a matter of public record, I hereby move that we reject Tedd's > >formal apology due to grammatical errors in construct. ;-P > > > >-- > >Daniel P. Brown > > You know you guys are going to k

Re: [PHP] OT A public apology to Larry Garfield

2007-08-07 Thread tedd
At 10:36 AM -0400 8/7/07, Daniel Brown wrote: As a matter of public record, I hereby move that we reject Tedd's formal apology due to grammatical errors in construct. ;-P -- Daniel P. Brown You know you guys are going to keep this up until I have to apologize to everyone for the things

Re: [PHP] OT A public apology to Larry Garfield

2007-08-07 Thread tedd
At 10:31 AM -0400 8/7/07, Robert Cummings wrote: On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 10:23 -0400, tedd wrote: Hi gang: In the long winded debate over copyright infringement vs thievery, I made an unkind and untrue inference re Larry Garfield. So, as a matter of public apology, I hereby apologize to Larr

Re: [PHP] OT A public apology to Larry Garfield

2007-08-07 Thread Daniel Brown
On 8/7/07, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 10:23 -0400, tedd wrote: > > Hi gang: > > > > In the long winded debate over copyright infringement vs thievery, I > > made an unkind and untrue inference re Larry Garfield. > > > > So, as a matter of public apology, I he

Re: [PHP] OT A public apology to Larry Garfield

2007-08-07 Thread Robert Cummings
On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 10:23 -0400, tedd wrote: > Hi gang: > > In the long winded debate over copyright infringement vs thievery, I > made an unkind and untrue inference re Larry Garfield. > > So, as a matter of public apology, I hereby apologize to Larry > publicly for my heated remark. I'm sor