> > Next thing, please add a reply-to header that has the lists mailing
> > address.
>
> This is a topic of debate, and many people (including myself) would urge people
> to ignore this advice. Mangling mail headers can have bad consequences, and
> there is very little reason to do so.
Yeah, but
I would like to also say that if one follows some sort of guideline that
person is likely to recieve more help (responses).
I know that if there are subjects that are vague and emails that contain
little information, i tend to delete them. Whereas, if someone takes the
time to address the issue, g
"Chris Shiflett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --- Burhan Khalid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Next thing, please add a reply-to header that has the lists mailing
> > address.
>
> This is a topic of debate, and many people (including myself) would urge
people
> to
Burhan Khalid wrote:
Listees,
Personally, I'm getting a little annoyed by this, and rather than
flame any thread in general, I would like to post this note
regarding some guidelines that I believe constitute responsible list
posting.
Here is a another resource on mailing list etiquette tha
--- Burhan Khalid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Next thing, please add a reply-to header that has the lists mailing
> address.
This is a topic of debate, and many people (including myself) would urge people
to ignore this advice. Mangling mail headers can have bad consequences, and
there is very li
5 matches
Mail list logo