Re: [PHP] Enterprise

2008-05-20 Thread Nikola Stjelja
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 11:39 AM, Richard Heyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ray Hauge wrote: > >> I just read an interesting article about enterprise software. One of the >> most common arguments against PHP tends to be "It's not enterprise ready." >> This article talks more about ruby, but it

Re: [PHP] Enterprise

2008-05-20 Thread Richard Heyes
Ray Hauge wrote: I just read an interesting article about enterprise software. One of the most common arguments against PHP tends to be "It's not enterprise ready." This article talks more about ruby, but it could be about any "non-enterprise" language as well. http://lists.canonical.org/pi

Re: [PHP] Enterprise

2008-05-20 Thread Zoltán Németh
Ray Hauge írta: I just read an interesting article about enterprise software. One of the most common arguments against PHP tends to be "It's not enterprise ready." This article talks more about ruby, but it could be about any "non-enterprise" language as well. http://lists.canonical.org/pip

Re: [PHP] Enterprise

2008-05-20 Thread Wolf
Ray Hauge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just read an interesting article about enterprise software. One of > the most common arguments against PHP tends to be "It's not enterprise > ready." This article talks more about ruby, but it could be about any > "non-enterprise" language as wel

Re: [PHP] Enterprise

2008-05-20 Thread Dan Joseph
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Ray Hauge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just read an interesting article about enterprise software. One of the > most common arguments against PHP tends to be "It's not enterprise ready." > This article talks more about ruby, but it could be about any > "non-ent

RE: [PHP] Enterprise grade CMS+Ecomm

2006-07-21 Thread Chris W. Parker
Larry Garfield on Thursday, July 20, 2006 6:36 PM said: > On Thursday 20 July 2006 11:30, Chris W. Parker wrote: > > Drupal has its own ecommerce suite that is reasonably robust all on > its own. Yeah I saw that module. I think today I am going to try to set them b

Re: [PHP] Enterprise grade CMS+Ecomm

2006-07-20 Thread Larry Garfield
On Thursday 20 July 2006 11:30, Chris W. Parker wrote: > The answer doesn't even have to be specifically one way or the other. It > could be a mixture of the two. Perhaps I use something like Drupal > (which I have no experience with) for the CMS part and write my own > ecommerce application. Or p

RE: [PHP] Enterprise grade CMS+Ecomm

2006-07-20 Thread Chris W. Parker
Brady Mitchell on Thursday, July 20, 2006 12:25 PM said: > The answer to this question depends heavily on your needs. What kind > of functionality do you need to get out of your website? If you are > looking for a website that is similar to others in function, than

RE: [PHP] Enterprise grade CMS+Ecomm

2006-07-20 Thread Brady Mitchell
> -Original Message- > The question I have to answer is "Do I write everything by myself from scratch > and spend 3-6 months doing it? Or do I spend that same amount of money on a prebuilt system > and spend 1 month integrating our new branding?" The answer to this question depends heavi

Re: [PHP] Enterprise grade CMS+Ecomm

2006-07-20 Thread Paul Scott
On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 09:30 -0700, Chris W. Parker wrote: > As for a CMS, I just watched a video on Drupal 4.7 and it looks quite > interesting. Opinions? > How about having a look at http://avoir.uwc.ac.za/ ? Its Free, very easy to learn and has a very active user and developer community. Its

Re: [PHP] enterprise patterns headache

2005-04-14 Thread Robert Janeczek
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, Richard Lynch wrote: On Wed, April 13, 2005 2:01 pm, Robert Janeczek said: I can't claim a detailed understanding of what you are doing, and, frankly, it sounds like you are creating a BUNCH of over-engineered headache-inducing code without a good, proven need for it. YMVV. Th

Re: [PHP] enterprise patterns headache

2005-04-13 Thread Richard Lynch
On Wed, April 13, 2005 2:01 pm, Robert Janeczek said: I can't claim a detailed understanding of what you are doing, and, frankly, it sounds like you are creating a BUNCH of over-engineered headache-inducing code without a good, proven need for it. YMVV. That said, one thing I *did* understand an

Re: [PHP] enterprise php application automated testing

2004-10-23 Thread Ramil Sagum
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 20:00:48 -0400, blackwater dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello all, > > I know I can use simpletest to test my application at the class level > but I need a tool to test it at a much higher level. I need something > to enter data in forms, click links, etc. I have played s

Re: [PHP] enterprise php application automated testing

2004-10-23 Thread Bruno B B Magalhães
Well, we call it pre-testing, the only way, and the better one, is doing it with the future users of your system! Regards, Bruno B B Magalhães On Oct 23, 2004, at 10:00 PM, blackwater dev wrote: Hello all, I know I can use simpletest to test my application at the class level but I need a tool to