Re: [PHP] Disk IO performance

2010-11-29 Thread Daniel Molina Wegener
On Monday 29 November 2010, Per Jessen wrote: > Daniel Molina Wegener wrote: > > On Sunday 28 November 2010, > > > > Larry Garfield wrote: > >> There are many things that everybody "knows" about optimizing PHP > >> code. One of them is that one of the most expensive parts of the > >> process is

Re: [PHP] Disk IO performance

2010-11-29 Thread Per Jessen
Daniel Molina Wegener wrote: > On Sunday 28 November 2010, > Larry Garfield wrote: > >> There are many things that everybody "knows" about optimizing PHP >> code. One of them is that one of the most expensive parts of the >> process is loading code off of disk and compiling it, which is why >> o

Re: [PHP] Disk IO performance

2010-11-29 Thread Daniel Molina Wegener
On Sunday 28 November 2010, Larry Garfield wrote: > There are many things that everybody "knows" about optimizing PHP code. > One of them is that one of the most expensive parts of the process is > loading code off of disk and compiling it, which is why opcode caches > are such a bit performance

Re: [PHP] Disk IO performance

2010-11-28 Thread Per Jessen
Larry Garfield wrote: > There are many things that everybody "knows" about optimizing PHP > code. One of them is that one of the most expensive parts of the > process is loading code off of disk and compiling it, which is why > opcode caches are such a bit performance boost. The corollary to > t

Re: [PHP] Disk IO performance

2010-11-28 Thread Andrew Mason
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Larry Garfield wrote: > There are many things that everybody "knows" about optimizing PHP code.  One > of them is that one of the most expensive parts of the process is loading code > off of disk and compiling it, which is why opcode caches are such a bit > perfor