On Oct 30, 2006, at 9:20 PM, Børge Holen wrote:
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 02:27, Ed Lazor wrote:
Someone asked what it was to be used for.
It's for combining 4 forums into one witch shows the latest
movement among
them. More like an introduction sort of...
Sounds cool. Are you using a pre-
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 02:27, Ed Lazor wrote:
> > Someone asked what it was to be used for.
> > It's for combining 4 forums into one witch shows the latest
> > movement among
> > them. More like an introduction sort of...
>
> Sounds cool. Are you using a pre-made forum package?
No
Maby it'd
Someone asked what it was to be used for.
It's for combining 4 forums into one witch shows the latest
movement among
them. More like an introduction sort of...
Sounds cool. Are you using a pre-made forum package?
-Ed
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: h
On Monday 30 October 2006 05:46, Richard Lynch wrote:
> On Sun, October 29, 2006 3:34 pm, Børge Holen wrote:
> > Hi.
> > I got this working (almost)
> > How do I decide (inside?) the whileloop the table_nr, 1 to 4 witch the
> > link is
> > echo'ed from.
> >
> > I could add another field in each tab
Sorry, Ed, I had intended my reply to be friendly as well. I'm
allergic to smiley-face icons, but I should have tried harder to
convey my tone. Dang this poker-faced email!
No worries. It's all good :)
-Ed
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://
At 10/29/2006 08:04 PM, Ed Lazor wrote:
That seems unreasonably harsh.
I can see what you mean, but don't take it that way. I was trying to
help.
Sorry, Ed, I had intended my reply to be friendly as well. I'm
allergic to smiley-face icons, but I should have tried harder to
convey my tone
On Sun, October 29, 2006 3:34 pm, Børge Holen wrote:
> Hi.
> I got this working (almost)
> How do I decide (inside?) the whileloop the table_nr, 1 to 4 witch the
> link is
> echo'ed from.
>
> I could add another field in each table telling witch table it is.
> Easy
> solution, but feels like pollut
That seems unreasonably harsh.
I can see what you mean, but don't take it that way. I was trying to
help.
What in your view is wrong with a union query that preserves an
indicator of which component table a particular record comes from?
Read earlier in the thread. He's talking about
On Oct 29, 2006, at 2:00 PM, Børge Holen wrote:
Would you suggest to use a extra field to hold the table name as
default?
At 10/29/2006 04:16 PM, Ed Lazor wrote:
Definitely not. Review your design. If you need to know which table
data comes from, then perform table specific queries. If y
Definitely not. Review your design. If you need to know which table
data comes from, then perform table specific queries. If you need to
combine data from more than one table, code your application to
respond accordingly. You may also need to review your database
schema design in order
Børge Holen wrote:
Ok.
Would you suggest to use a extra field to hold the table name as default?
Why do you need to know which table it's in? What are you going to use
it for in the next step? I see you're passing it in:
echo "page";
but what are you going to do with it?
I think if you ex
Ok.
Would you suggest to use a extra field to hold the table name as default?
On Sunday 29 October 2006 22:59, Ed Lazor wrote:
> PHP can't tell what table the data came from.
>
> On Oct 29, 2006, at 1:34 PM, Børge Holen wrote:
> > Hi.
> > I got this working (almost)
> > How do I decide (inside?)
PHP can't tell what table the data came from.
On Oct 29, 2006, at 1:34 PM, Børge Holen wrote:
Hi.
I got this working (almost)
How do I decide (inside?) the whileloop the table_nr, 1 to 4 witch
the link is
echo'ed from.
I could add another field in each table telling witch table it is.
Ea
13 matches
Mail list logo
