TED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Kurth
Bemis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 10:49 AM
Subject: Re: [PHP] Best browser
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Kurth Bemis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Jason Jacobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Original Message -
From: Kurth Bemis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Jason Jacobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 9:43 AM
Subject: Re: [PHP] Best browser
> At 10:39 AM 2/27/2001, Jason Jacobs wrote:
>
> he's probabl
At 10:39 AM 2/27/2001, Jason Jacobs wrote:
he's probably referring to the SSL code that the browser uses. In that
aspect - it doesn't matter. i'd personally choose netscape because of
their good track record and conformity to standards. M$ does things their
way or the hiway. Both browsers
J-,
I have tested netscape communicator 4.76 with ssl extensively. no problems
what so ever.
Take a look at www.modssl.org for some of the common problems that are
associated with Internet Explorer
and ssl.
>The users all have MS Win 95, 98, or NT. The
> quality (ie. the 'bug-free-ness") of t
It's been my experience that Netscape doesn't support mistakes as well as IE
(example...forgetting a close td tag or close table, stuff like that), so
usually if I build a page, I use Netscape to check it and it almost always
works the same in IE. As far as php and ssl goes, isn't that all server
5 matches
Mail list logo
