Re: [PHP]{so far OT it boggles} BTML 2.0 released!!!

Robert Cummings wrote: OK, I've decided to be sucked back in for one more response... If something as trivial as this is where you want to make your big stand in life, please do it offlist. This went from bas' off topic introduction of his crap, to the current flaming about posting crap. You're

RE: [PHP]{so far OT it boggles} BTML 2.0 released!!!

On Fri, 2003-11-07 at 17:33, Craig Lonsbury wrote: > > > > Personally, these emails don't help me at all in my search > > for help, or > > helping people with php problems. Could I suggest that you guys maybe > > put a forum up for anybody who wants to bitch about this > > topic? OR maybe > > someo

RE: [PHP]{so far OT it boggles} BTML 2.0 released!!!

> > Personally, these emails don't help me at all in my search > for help, or > helping people with php problems. Could I suggest that you guys maybe > put a forum up for anybody who wants to bitch about this > topic? OR maybe > someone could setup a php-arguments list for topics such as these! >

Re: [PHP]{so far OT it boggles} BTML 2.0 released!!!

Chris W. Parker wrote: Robert Cummings on Friday, November 07, 2003 1:12 PM said: Yes you're re-iterating your circular arguments. Here's how I see your point of view: Everyone must do it because the majority are doing it (AKA the sheep follows the sheep follows...

RE: [PHP]{so far OT it boggles} BTML 2.0 released!!!

Robert Cummings on Friday, November 07, 2003 1:12 PM said: > Yes you're re-iterating your circular arguments. Here's how I see your > point of view: > > Everyone must do it because the majority are doing it (AKA the sheep > follows the sheep follows... who's leading

RE: [PHP]{so far OT it boggles} BTML 2.0 released!!!

OK, I've decided to be sucked back in for one more response... On Fri, 2003-11-07 at 15:50, Mike Migurski wrote: > > Here's an argument: the correlation between intelligent, active members of Subjective evaluation based on no empirical data and probaby not even on any kind of professional experie

RE: [PHP]{so far OT it boggles} BTML 2.0 released!!!

>> There is evolution and then there is etiquette. Top-posting is not on >> par with proving a theory (flat-earth v spherical-earth) or evolution >> of systems. In as much as it is proper etiquette to trim and >> bottom-post it is rude to be diametric, just as it is rude to fart on >> purpose at a

RE: [PHP]{so far OT it boggles} BTML 2.0 released!!!

On Fri, 2003-11-07 at 15:16, Jay Blanchard wrote: > [snip] > ...evolving systems... > [/snip] > > There is evolution and then there is etiquette. Top-posting is not on > par with proving a theory (flat-earth v spherical-earth) or evolution of > systems. In as much as it is proper etiquette to trim

RE: [PHP]{so far OT it boggles} BTML 2.0 released!!!

[snip] ...evolving systems... [/snip] There is evolution and then there is etiquette. Top-posting is not on par with proving a theory (flat-earth v spherical-earth) or evolution of systems. In as much as it is proper etiquette to trim and bottom-post it is rude to be diametric, just as it is rude