>By "no attachment" I assume you mean you can't get the attachment
>through the user
>interface. But, I bet the attachment is there if you look at the
>source code of the
>message itself. Right? That indicates the attachment was sent and
>received. The
>trick is then getting Lookout to properl
Hi Dave:
On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 05:45:17PM -0400, Dave wrote:
>
> Email appears with text portion and attachment icon, but no attachment (Outlook
> 2000).
By "no attachment" I assume you mean you can't get the attachment through the user
interface. But, I bet the attachment is there if you lo
On Wednesday 05 June 2002 21:36, Dave wrote:
> anyone on this...
>
> a few have suggested "install this class" and so forth. That is not the
> point. the goal is to correctly format and encode the simple message with
> attachment so we can customize things from there. The classes available
> for
anyone on this...
a few have suggested "install this class" and so forth. That is not the point.
the goal is to correctly format and encode the simple message with attachment so
we can customize things from there. The classes available for this are great,
but defeat the purpose of understanding
4 matches
Mail list logo
