>> > tecnically whats the diffrance if I do:
>> >
>> > require("http://localhost/image.gif";);
>> > or
>> > require("http://www.domain.com/image.gif";); ?
>>
>> The first one requires the file at "localhost/image.gif", and the
>second
>> one requires the file at "www.domain.com/image.gif".
In
Isn't this an example of using require in the wrong context, since you don't
typically load a gif file and attempt to process it as a PHP file?
http://www.php.net/manual/en/function.require.php
The require() statement includes and evaluates the specific file.
-Original Message-
I think
I think thats more than obvious Erik.. I asked for the tecnical
diffrance. Anybody?
>
> On Wednesday, June 26, 2002, at 03:19 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > tecnically whats the diffrance if I do:
> >
> > require("http://localhost/image.gif";);
> > or
> > require("http://www.domain.co
On Wednesday, June 26, 2002, at 03:19 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> tecnically whats the diffrance if I do:
>
> require("http://localhost/image.gif";);
> or
> require("http://www.domain.com/image.gif";); ?
The first one requires the file at "localhost/image.gif", and the second
one requir
4 matches
Mail list logo