RE: [PHP] Re: oo question

Apr 19 at 11:06am, Chris W. Parker wrote: > Torsten Roehr > > One personal suggestion: you could directly put the code from > > initialize_customer() into the constructor. > > but i'm thinking that i might, at some point, want to use that method > after the object has be

RE: [PHP] Re: oo question

> > One personal suggestion: you could directly put the code from > > initialize_customer() into the constructor. > > but i'm thinking that i might, at some point, want to use that method > after the object has been instantiated. i can't think of a specific > case, but i'm only imagining that it's

Re: [PHP] Re: oo question

>"Chris W. Parker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Torsten Roehr on Monday, April 19, 2004 10:46 AM said: >> the second approach is definitely much, much better and the right way >> to go. But what exactly is your QUESTION? >oh yeah.. um

RE: [PHP] Re: oo question

the same thing with php. Eddie -Original Message- From: Chris W. Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 2:07 PM To: Torsten Roehr; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [PHP] Re: oo question Torsten Roehr <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Monday, April 19, 2004 10

RE: [PHP] Re: oo question

Torsten Roehr on Monday, April 19, 2004 10:46 AM said: > the second approach is definitely much, much better and the right way > to go. But what exactly is your QUESTION? oh yeah.. umm... i guess at this point it would be "which is better?"... as i was writing the