On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Gabe wrote:
What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
application development? There seems to be a number of them out there, but
I'm not sure which one's are the most robust, actively developed, secure, etc
etc.
Thoughts?
I echo others in th
--=neXtPaRt_1154507404
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Personally, I think that the community at the Zend Framework is doing a
> pretty good job. Everything is coded very well, with a lot of
> possibilities to extend things to your personal needs (if nessecary).
Hidayet Dogan schreef:
What about CakePHP and Code Igniter?
I know working with Code Igniter easier than CakePHP, but CakePHP is
more capable than Code Igniter.
Hi,
Lately frameworks have become a real *hype*. Currently, there are more
than 40 frameworks out there, and new ones are being re
What about CakePHP and Code Igniter?
I know working with Code Igniter easier than CakePHP, but CakePHP is more
capable than Code Igniter.
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 04:15 +0200, rich gray wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
[chop]
An IDE is not a framework,
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 04:15 +0200, rich gray wrote:
> Robert Cummings wrote:
> > [chop]
> > An IDE is not a framework, it's an IDE :)
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Rob.
> >
> I think Rob is being unduly modest - correct me if I am wrong but he is
> the core developer of the InterJinn php framework ->
>
Robert Cummings wrote:
[chop]
An IDE is not a framework, it's an IDE :)
Cheers,
Rob.
I think Rob is being unduly modest - correct me if I am wrong but he is
the core developer of the InterJinn php framework ->
http://interjinn.com - it's been out there for a while now (read:
robust, fully
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 23:40 +0100, Steve Turnbull wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 12:35 -0400, Gabe wrote:
> > What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
> > application development? There seems to be a number of them out there,
> > but I'm not sure which one's are the mos
Steve Turnbull wrote:
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 12:35 -0400, Gabe wrote:
What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
application development? There seems to be a number of them out there,
but I'm not sure which one's are the most robust, actively developed,
secure, etc etc.
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 12:35 -0400, Gabe wrote:
> What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
> application development? There seems to be a number of them out there,
> but I'm not sure which one's are the most robust, actively developed,
> secure, etc etc.
>
> Thoughts?
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006 19:44:28 +0200
"Satyam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is no 'common consensus' but I am sure you'll be getting lots and
> lots, I would even say LOTS, of sugestions.
I would be very skeptical of any "suggestions" because only someone
who tried multiple frameworks would b
There is no 'common consensus' but I am sure you'll be getting lots and
lots, I would even say LOTS, of sugestions.
Satyam
- Original Message -
From: "Gabe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 6:35 PM
Subject: [PHP] PHP Frameworks - Opinion
What's the common co
I like what I've been seeing from Solar at solarphp.com. And Paul Jones,
the maintainer, is extremely active on the project and the community
seems to be very much in love with the framework. Community is a little
small but going pretty strong.
James Kilbride
> -Original Message-
> From:
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 12:35 -0400, Gabe wrote:
> What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
> application development? There seems to be a number of them out there,
> but I'm not sure which one's are the most robust, actively developed,
> secure, etc etc.
>
OK, from m
This one time, at band camp, Gabe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
> application development? There seems to be a number of them out there,
> but I'm not sure which one's are the most robust, actively developed,
> secure, etc etc.
14 matches
Mail list logo