On Saturday 09 August 2003 00:54, Dan Phiffer wrote:
> Thanks for all the feedback, guys. Is there an errata page somewhere that
> lists known bugs in the PHP interpretter?
google > php bugs
--
Jason Wong -> Gremlins Associates -> www.gremlins.biz
Open Source Software Systems Integrators
* Web D
On Friday 08 August 2003 09:43, Justin French wrote:
> i think the best reason to keep up-to-date on the versions is that each
> new release is "better, more stable, etc etc"... i haven't ever heard
> anyone on this list say "i prefer 4.2.3 over 4.2.4" :)
But each new release brings new problems
On Saturday 09 August 2003 01:46, Dan Phiffer wrote:
> I appreciate the (rather indirect) pointer to the PHP bug tracking site - I
> didn't know about that. Errata, it seems to me anyway, perform a different
> purpose. I don't mind RTFM-style responses, but please at least read my
> question more c
On 08 August 2003 19:00, Jason Wong wrote:
> Whereas changelog, history, release notes will summarise what bugs
> were fixed between versions. None of these resources are called
> errata although some linux distros may present these as erratum
> (plural?).
Well, since you ask, erratum is the sin
long. The first
time you pressure them into an upgrade that breaks 20 other customers, they
will be wiser and you won't get much help from them anymore. Most likely,
your current ISP has been here.
thx,
Neil
"behaviour is caused, and the causes are many"
- Original Message -----
actually u can explicitly turn on registered globals with a setting in
a .htaccess file
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Friday, August 8, 2003, at 10:28 AM, Neil Davis wrote:
Fellas,
can't see how this should be an issue.
It is a security issue. Most ISP's don't allow register_globals to be
turned
on. Read the php docs about register_globals. Zeev and company explain
it
better than I can.
http://www.php.net/r
k on the PHP website a bit misleading since
that page serves more purposes than simply reporting bugs.
Okay enough of my bitching,
-Dan
- Original Message -
From: "Jason Wong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: php.general
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, Augus
> > > Thanks for all the feedback, guys. Is there an errata page somewhere
> > > lists known bugs in the PHP interpretter?
> >
> > google > php bugs
>
> I appreciate the (rather indirect) pointer to the PHP bug tracking site - I
> didn't know about that. Errata, it seems to me anyway, perform a dif
On Friday, August 8, 2003, at 09:21 AM, Dan Phiffer wrote:
I'm working on an ongoing project that depends on a shared webserver
running
an old version of PHP (4.1.2 I believe). Is there any good reason to
stick
with an older version of PHP, or might it be a valid suggestion to
have it
upgraded
Thanks for all the feedback, guys. Is there an errata page somewhere that
lists known bugs in the PHP interpretter?
Thanks,
-Dan
"Jason Wong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Friday 08 August 2003 09:43, Justin French wrote:
>
> > i think the best reason to keep up
* Thus wrote Ford, Mike [LSS] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> (There are also words in English derived from Greek which have singular ending -on
> and plural ending -a -- notably criterion/criteria. Microsoft doesn't understand
> this, and gets it tooth-jarringly wrong all over Excel and
12 matches
Mail list logo
