you can with myODBC
Mike R wrote:
You can't interface MySQL with ODBC?
-Mike
I agree. I've found MS SQL (and MS Access databases) to be extremely fast
when well optimised, even with massive databases. As you can
interface with
them using ODBC I prefer to use MS database backends when my
cl
but still keep HTTP open... and that's running the notorius IIS :-)
Jason Wong wrote:
>On Tuesday 18 November 2003 00:27, Mike R wrote:
>
>
>>Actually, their claim is that Microsoft environments are secure - you just
>>need the proper firewall (that, basically, the problems with Windows boxes
>
Dan Joseph wrote:
Hi,
From my experiences, your coworkers are somewhat correct. I found MySQL to
be as fast in most cases, however in databases with millions of records,
MySQL started slowing down before the MS SQL did.
This is true for inserts but retrievals mysql would still be faster.
I have a friend who is has MCDBA, MCSE and MCSD he had 100% scores for
a couple of exams!
was a die hard fan of ASP.NET until recently when he discovered PHP.
hasn't written any ASP.NET code since. That should tell us something :-)
Mike R wrote:
I have someone here at my desk arguing that Micr
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 11:06:37AM -0500, Mike R wrote:
:
: I have someone here at my desk arguing that Microsoft's .NET is better
: than PHP - faster to process, easier and quicker to program, etc.
:
: They also (claim) that Microsoft's SQL is much faster and such vs. MySQL.
Without real benchm
Mike R wrote:
I have someone here at my desk arguing that Microsoft's .NET is better than
PHP - faster to process, easier and quicker to program, etc.
I've never coded anything for .NET, so I can't speak to that. However,
in all the test my company has ever done, php on Linux/Apache blew the
doo
Jay Blanchard wrote:
> [snip]
> I have someone here at my desk arguing that Microsoft's .NET
> is better than PHP - faster to process, easier and quicker to
> program, etc.
>
> They also (claim) that Microsoft's SQL is much faster and such vs.
> MySQL.
>
> Any comments to help me defend PHP or
On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 11:27, Mike R wrote:
> Actually, their claim is that Microsoft environments are secure - you just
> need the proper firewall (that, basically, the problems with Windows boxes
> has to do with the firewall, not the OS).
>
> That one I laughed at.
>
See how deep seeded the br
Hi,
> > Actually, their claim is that Microsoft environments are secure
> - you just
> > need the proper firewall (that, basically, the problems with
> Windows boxes
> > has to do with the firewall, not the OS).
> >
> > That one I laughed at.
>
> But it's true, you can solve most of the security p
You can't interface MySQL with ODBC?
-Mike
>
> I agree. I've found MS SQL (and MS Access databases) to be extremely fast
> when well optimised, even with massive databases. As you can
> interface with
> them using ODBC I prefer to use MS database backends when my
> clients already
> have the
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 00:27, Mike R wrote:
> Actually, their claim is that Microsoft environments are secure - you just
> need the proper firewall (that, basically, the problems with Windows boxes
> has to do with the firewall, not the OS).
>
> That one I laughed at.
But it's true, you can s
ginal Message-
From: Dan Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 November 2003 16:26
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [PHP] Microsoft .NET arguement
Hi,
From my experiences, your coworkers are somewhat correct. I found
MySQL to
be as fast in most cases, however in databases with millio
TED]
> Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 11:28 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [PHP] Microsoft .NET arguement
>
>
>
> Actually, their claim is that Microsoft environments are secure - you just
> need the proper firewall (that, basically, th
Actually, their claim is that Microsoft environments are secure - you just
need the proper firewall (that, basically, the problems with Windows boxes
has to do with the firewall, not the OS).
That one I laughed at.
-Mike
> and next they will no doubt claim that IIS (and windowz in general) is
[snip]
...
[/snip]
http://www.sitepoint.com/article/870
GIS for Microsoft NET vs. PHP
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hi,
From my experiences, your coworkers are somewhat correct. I found MySQL to
be as fast in most cases, however in databases with millions of records,
MySQL started slowing down before the MS SQL did.
As for PHP being slower to program, I disagree. Its about the same, and in
so
[snip]
I have someone here at my desk arguing that Microsoft's .NET is better
than
PHP - faster to process, easier and quicker to program, etc.
They also (claim) that Microsoft's SQL is much faster and such vs.
MySQL.
Any comments to help me defend PHP or to educate me?
[/snip]
Both 'arguments'
17 matches
Mail list logo
