On 5/25/07, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 18:20 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
> On 5/25/07, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 18:04 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
> > > On 5/25/07, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2007
On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 18:20 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
> On 5/25/07, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 18:04 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
> > > On 5/25/07, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 17:07 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
> > > > > I like to
On 5/25/07, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 18:04 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
> On 5/25/07, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 17:07 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
> > > I like to keep it simple, just like this:
> > > /
> > > /data
> > > /
On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 18:04 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
> On 5/25/07, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 17:07 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
> > > I like to keep it simple, just like this:
> > > /
> > > /data
> > > /http
> > > /project1
> > > /includes
> > >
On 5/25/07, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 17:07 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
> On 5/25/07, Edward Kay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Tijnema [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >
> > > > > It's just the way you write script, m
On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 17:07 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
> On 5/25/07, Edward Kay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Tijnema [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >
> > > > > It's just the way you write script, my included files contain only
> > > > > functions & varia
On 5/25/07, Edward Kay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Tijnema [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > It's just the way you write script, my included files contain only
> > > functions & variables, no executing code. 99% I have a class around
> > > it.
> > > If you
> -Original Message-
> From: Tijnema [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > It's just the way you write script, my included files contain only
> > > functions & variables, no executing code. 99% I have a class around
> > > it.
> > > If you write it like that, than there's no problem with ex
On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 16:17 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
> On 5/25/07, Edward Kay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why are your include files in your web root in the first place? Move them
> > elsewhere on your filesystem and then it's not even possible to access them
> > via the web.
> >
> > Edward
> >
> O
On 5/25/07, Edward Kay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Tijnema [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 25 May 2007 15:00
> To: tedd
> Cc: Kevin Murphy; Stephen; php
> Subject: Re: [PHP] Include file questions
>
>
> On 5/25/07, tedd &l
> -Original Message-
> From: Tijnema [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 25 May 2007 15:00
> To: tedd
> Cc: Kevin Murphy; Stephen; php
> Subject: Re: [PHP] Include file questions
>
>
> On 5/25/07, tedd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > At 1:55 PM -0700
On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 16:00 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
> On 5/25/07, tedd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > At 1:55 PM -0700 5/23/07, Kevin Murphy wrote:
> > >.inc files have a disadvantage in that if you view the file:
> > >
> > >http://www.yoursite.com/file.inc
> > >
> > >you can see the php code. I pref
On 5/25/07, tedd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 1:55 PM -0700 5/23/07, Kevin Murphy wrote:
>.inc files have a disadvantage in that if you view the file:
>
>http://www.yoursite.com/file.inc
>
>you can see the php code. I prefer not to use those just on the off
>chance that someone can see my code a
At 1:55 PM -0700 5/23/07, Kevin Murphy wrote:
.inc files have a disadvantage in that if you view the file:
http://www.yoursite.com/file.inc
you can see the php code. I prefer not to use those just on the off
chance that someone can see my code and use that as the basis for
figuring out a way
On Wed, May 23, 2007 3:48 pm, Stephen wrote:
> 1) Does the filename extension matter? I prefer *.inc? It seems to
> work fine, but I only see others using *.php
>From a strictly "will it work" stand-point, the extension can be
anything you want or none at all.
HOWEVER, there are various security
Stephen escribió:
1) Does the filename extension matter? I prefer *.inc? It seems to work fine,
but I only see others using *.php
2) Does the include file need an opening ?
Not big issues, but I am curious.
Thanks
Stephen
If you use .inc extension you will have to modi
Kevin Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: .inc files have a disadvantage in that
if you view the file:
http://www.yoursite.com/file.inc
you can see the php code. I prefer not to use those just on the off chance
that someone can see my code and use that as the basis for figuring out a wa
.inc files have a disadvantage in that if you view the file:
http://www.yoursite.com/file.inc
you can see the php code. I prefer not to use those just on the off
chance that someone can see my code and use that as the basis for
figuring out a way to exploit it (especially true of password fi
18 matches
Mail list logo