On Aug 13, 2007, at 2:16 PM, Richard Lynch wrote:
Of course, the question of whether it's a Good Idea to show something
different for a manual Refresh versus META refresh springs to mind...
I can't see why you'd want to do this for anything other than
educational purposes...
Well, as the OP,
On Sat, August 11, 2007 9:39 pm, Robert Cummings wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-08-11 at 19:36 -0700, Geoff Nicol wrote:
>> Rob,
>>
>> What you suggested, which matches the theory of what I and others
>> suggested, would certainly work as an ID that changes is involved.
>>
>> If you read the specific postin
On Sun, 2007-08-12 at 13:47 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
> On 8/12/07, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, 2007-08-11 at 22:11 -0500, Richard Lynch wrote:
> > > You don't do it there.
> > >
> > > You do whatever it is you have to do in the URL before you re-direct.
> > >
> > > Though I
On 8/12/07, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-08-11 at 22:11 -0500, Richard Lynch wrote:
> > You don't do it there.
> >
> > You do whatever it is you have to do in the URL before you re-direct.
> >
> > Though I guess if you want different output on that page, you would
> > n
On Sat, 2007-08-11 at 22:11 -0500, Richard Lynch wrote:
> You don't do it there.
>
> You do whatever it is you have to do in the URL before you re-direct.
>
> Though I guess if you want different output on that page, you would
> need to set something somewhere, be it session, database, or a cooki
You don't do it there.
You do whatever it is you have to do in the URL before you re-direct.
Though I guess if you want different output on that page, you would
need to set something somewhere, be it session, database, or a cookie.
On Sat, August 11, 2007 8:25 pm, Geoff Nicol wrote:
> And if the
On Sat, 2007-08-11 at 19:36 -0700, Geoff Nicol wrote:
> Rob,
>
> What you suggested, which matches the theory of what I and others
> suggested, would certainly work as an ID that changes is involved.
>
> If you read the specific posting by Richard Lynch, which is what I was
> replying to, you wil
Rob,
What you suggested, which matches the theory of what I and others suggested,
would certainly work as an ID that changes is involved.
If you read the specific posting by Richard Lynch, which is what I was
replying to, you will note he suggest refreshing to a static
'was_meta_refresh_before' l
On Sat, 2007-08-11 at 18:26 -0700, Geoff Nicol wrote:
> And if they do a manual refresh on the page you re-directed to, the
> "was_meta_refresh_before" flag will be set.
> How will you tell it from a meta-refresh redirect?
I already explained this in previous email. Go read the history of this
thr
And if they do a manual refresh on the page you re-directed to, the
"was_meta_refresh_before" flag will be set.
How will you tell it from a meta-refresh redirect?
You need to use a cookie or session id. Regardless, by reading the whole
thread and 'cheating off the other students' this has been pre
On Fri, August 10, 2007 6:51 pm, Geoff Nicol wrote:
> That was my first thought as well but you will still have to use a
> session
> variable or cookie for the page following redirect to know it was a
> meta-refresh.
No.
For the page following, you can use some other GET parameter, such as
"was_m
At 2:10 AM +0200 8/11/07, Tijnema wrote:
On 8/11/07, Richard Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, August 10, 2007 1:26 pm, Kevin Murphy wrote:
> I doubt this, but is there any way to determine via PHP if a browser
> was refreshed automatically via a META tag vs the person clicking the
>
On Sat, 2007-08-11 at 02:10 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
> On 8/11/07, Richard Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, August 10, 2007 1:26 pm, Kevin Murphy wrote:
> > > I doubt this, but is there any way to determine via PHP if a browser
> > > was refreshed automatically via a META tag vs the person
On 8/11/07, Richard Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, August 10, 2007 1:26 pm, Kevin Murphy wrote:
> > I doubt this, but is there any way to determine via PHP if a browser
> > was refreshed automatically via a META tag vs the person clicking the
> > refresh button?
>
> You could embed some
On Fri, August 10, 2007 1:26 pm, Kevin Murphy wrote:
> I doubt this, but is there any way to determine via PHP if a browser
> was refreshed automatically via a META tag vs the person clicking the
> refresh button?
You could embed something in the META tag's URL such as:
http://example.com?from_me
On 8/10/07, Stut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kevin Murphy wrote:
> > I doubt this, but is there any way to determine via PHP if a browser was
> > refreshed automatically via a META tag vs the person clicking the
> > refresh button?
>
> Add a GET variable to the URL you put in the meta tag to tell
Hi Kevin,
Friday, August 10, 2007, 7:26:30 PM, you wrote:
> I doubt this, but is there any way to determine via PHP if a browser
> was refreshed automatically via a META tag vs the person clicking the
> refresh button?
You could dynamically generate the meta tag, so it refreshes to your
page w
On 8/10/07, Kevin Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I doubt this, but is there any way to determine via PHP if a browser
> was refreshed automatically via a META tag vs the person clicking the
> refresh button?
>
> --
> Kevin Murphy
Normally not, unless you add an extra GET item to the META tag,
Kevin Murphy wrote:
I doubt this, but is there any way to determine via PHP if a browser was
refreshed automatically via a META tag vs the person clicking the
refresh button?
Add a GET variable to the URL you put in the meta tag to tell you it
came from the meta tag.
P.S. Please note that m
I doubt this, but is there any way to determine via PHP if a browser
was refreshed automatically via a META tag vs the person clicking the
refresh button?
--
Kevin Murphy
Webmaster: Information and Marketing Services
Western Nevada College
www.wnc.edu
775-445-3326
P.S. Please note that my e-
20 matches
Mail list logo
