Ok. I think I got it. Now I have to look at my code again to see if I
can implement it.
Thanks for your time.
jck
Maxim Maletsky wrote:
Well, if, say, one class has this function:
function inherit($class_name, $pointer) {
$this->objects[$class_name] = $pointer;
}
then you end up knowing that
Well, if, say, one class has this function:
function inherit($class_name, $pointer) {
$this->objects[$class_name] = $pointer;
}
then you end up knowing that, whenever you need to access an instance
for a class, you can use $this->objects['that_class']->that_array.
What I picked on, was
I am not really sure I understand what you are saying here, and I would
like to. Let me first say that I think the syntax you came up with
earlier will solve my immediate problem, but if I could design this in a
better way I'd like to know. Let me give you a few more details:
I have a large cla
You pass it the name of the element, and whatever the data inside. You
do not need to add other sub-elements to it automatically, as you would
need to be "searching" through the elements later for the right data.
Whatever your need is - it's a good idea using arrays, and add other
arrays into it.
See below:
MM> class Example {
MM> var $array = array();
MM> function add2array($element_name, $val){
MM> $this->$array[$element_name] = $val;
MM> }
MM> }
MM> $t = new Example();
$t->>add2array('array1',25);
$t->>add2array('array2',26);
$t->>add2array('array3',"Hello");
Tom Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote... :
> Hi,
>
> Thursday, November 7, 2002, 3:45:34 AM, you wrote:
>
> MM> Yet, this is not a such elegant way doing it. It can be helpful in a lot
> MM> of cases, but most often, element key is enough. Try rethinking your
> MM> logic:
>
>
> MM> class Exam
Hi,
Thursday, November 7, 2002, 3:45:34 AM, you wrote:
MM> Yet, this is not a such elegant way doing it. It can be helpful in a lot
MM> of cases, but most often, element key is enough. Try rethinking your
MM> logic:
MM> class Example {
MM> var $array = array();
MM> function add
Tom Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote... :
>
> Amazing what you learn on this list :)
> This works:
>
> class Example
> {
>var $array1 = array();
>var $array2 = array();
>var $array3 = array();
>
> function add2array($array_name,$val){
> $this->{"$array_name"}[] = $val;
> }
Hi,
Thursday, November 7, 2002, 3:11:12 AM, you wrote:
MM> You can do:
${"this->>$passed_in_array_name"}
MM> not sure right now of the correct syntaxing, I never do that - normally
MM> I'd pass the element key.
MM> --
MM> Maxim Maletsky
MM> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MM> John Kenyon <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Thanks, that may be what I was looking for.
jck
Maxim Maletsky wrote:
You can do:
${"this->$passed_in_array_name"}
not sure right now of the correct syntaxing, I never do that - normally
I'd pass the element key.
--
Maxim Maletsky
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
John Kenyon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote..
You can do:
${"this->$passed_in_array_name"}
not sure right now of the correct syntaxing, I never do that - normally
I'd pass the element key.
--
Maxim Maletsky
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
John Kenyon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote... :
> Thank you for replying, but I don't think I've made my problem clea
Thank you for replying, but I don't think I've made my problem clear
enough. Let me give it another shot.
What I want is a function that takes the name of an array as a parameter
so that it can be popped into any class that has arrays in it and work
without modification. The problem I am having
If I understand you, you need to have a basic class with the
one function and subclass it. Then you can reference the array
as $this->$passed_in_array_name
John Kenyon wrote:
I'm trying to write a function I can plop in a bunch of different
classes without having to modify it.
Basically I have
I'm trying to write a function I can plop in a bunch of different
classes without having to modify it.
Basically I have classes like:
class Example
{
var $array1;
var $array2;
var $array3;
etc.
}
and I want to have a function in that class that looks something like
this:
function do_
14 matches
Mail list logo
