On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 06:46, derby wrote:
>
> http://www.talkderby2me.com
Heh. I like the domain name, Derby. Welcome to the list.
--
daniel.br...@parasane.net || danbr...@php.net
http://www.parasane.net/ || http://www.pilotpig.net/
Unadvertised dedicated server deals, too low to print
Like many others, you also described exactly how I work.
with one exception... php is my only choice for server side scripting
/ programming. Sure there are others, perhaps better for some things,
languages, but I am sticking with PHP through snow, mud, earthquakes,
tsunamis, and solar radiation.
At 1:25 PM -0500 1/20/09, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 13:14 -0500, tedd wrote:
> I didn't pick at random, but rather what I thought -- my type: ENTJ
I think you're confused... I picked the test at random,
I've experienced a lot of that recently.
---
I've been INTP
since I
"Robert Cummings" wrote in message
news:1232447313.30838.5.ca...@localhost...
> On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 22:06 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
>> Robert Cummings wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:53 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
>> >
>> >> Robert Cummings wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:2
On Jan 20, 2009, at 9:54 AM, Jason Pruim wrote:
On Jan 20, 2009, at 9:18 AM, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 08:16 -0500, Jason Pruim wrote:
On Jan 19, 2009, at 10:12 PM, Paul M Foster wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:23:49PM -, c...@l-i-e.com wrote:
ESTJ
Me too.
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 13:14 -0500, tedd wrote:
> At 4:35 PM -0500 1/19/09, Robert Cummings wrote:
> >Are you an INTP?
> >
> >http://www.personalitytest.net/cgi-bin/q.pl
> >
> >(I don't know how good the test is, I picked one at random)
> >
> >Cheers,
> >Rob.
>
> I didn't pick at random, but rather
At 4:35 PM -0500 1/19/09, Robert Cummings wrote:
Are you an INTP?
http://www.personalitytest.net/cgi-bin/q.pl
(I don't know how good the test is, I picked one at random)
Cheers,
Rob.
I didn't pick at random, but rather what I thought -- my type: ENTJ
Interesting that the top related job pos
> catch-all?
Yes, with lots of spam filtering, including a custom one in PHP.
Got tired of waiting for webmail to run its filters.
PHP cron job on the server with IMAP.
Comes in handy for web sign-ups and the following spam -- And for identifying
spammers. I don't work with spammers.
On Jan 20, 2009, at 9:18 AM, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 08:16 -0500, Jason Pruim wrote:
On Jan 19, 2009, at 10:12 PM, Paul M Foster wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:23:49PM -, c...@l-i-e.com wrote:
ESTJ
Me too.
After answering 68 questions (All that displayed)
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 08:16 -0500, Jason Pruim wrote:
> On Jan 19, 2009, at 10:12 PM, Paul M Foster wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:23:49PM -, c...@l-i-e.com wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> ESTJ
> >>
> >
> > Me too.
>
> After answering 68 questions (All that displayed) it told me I didn't
> an
On Jan 19, 2009, at 10:12 PM, Paul M Foster wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:23:49PM -, c...@l-i-e.com wrote:
ESTJ
Me too.
After answering 68 questions (All that displayed) it told me I didn't
answer them all... So if I want to go in rewrite the stupid thing so
that it works pr
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 22:06 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> Robert Cummings wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:53 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> >
> >> Robert Cummings wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:28 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> >>>
> well just for the hell of it; a
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:23:49PM -, c...@l-i-e.com wrote:
>
> ESTJ
>
Me too.
Paul
--
Paul M. Foster
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
c...@l-i-e.com wrote:
Apparently, it's time for me to take on a project manager job and quit
coding...
Oddly enough, I've been thinking I might like to do that, though more
of an architect/manager role, really...
didn't you already make that change when you became ceo of an
intergalactic enter
>> Apparently, it's time for me to take on a project manager job and quit
>> coding...
>>
>> Oddly enough, I've been thinking I might like to do that, though more
>> of an architect/manager role, really...
>>
>
>didn't you already make that change when you became ceo of an
> intergalactic
ESTJ
Apparently, it's time for me to take on a project manager job and quit coding...
Oddly enough, I've been thinking I might like to do that, though more of an
architect/manager role, really...
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.ne
c...@l-i-e.com wrote:
ESTJ
Apparently, it's time for me to take on a project manager job and quit coding...
Oddly enough, I've been thinking I might like to do that, though more of an
architect/manager role, really...
didn't you already make that change when you became ceo of an
intergala
Bastien Koert wrote:
always, flex & php at the moment
ahh great to read, flex is amazing, the best product to hit the
developers market in years IMHO, coupled with XMPP (say openfire) it's
great as well - there's something about flex and xmpp.. say if you were
to implement a kind of http ove
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:53 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> Robert Cummings wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:28 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> >> well just for the hell of it; and because I'm feeling worn..
> >>
> >> anybody else find the following true when you're a developer?
> >>
> >> - frequent
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:53 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:28 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
well just for the hell of it; and because I'm feeling worn..
anybody else find the following true when you're a develope
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> well just for the hell of it; and because I'm feeling worn..
>
> anybody else find the following true when you're a developer?
>
> - frequent bursts of side-tracking onto more interesting subjects
of course
>
> - vast amount of inhuman f
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:53 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:28 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
well just for the hell of it; and because I'm feeling worn..
anybody else find the following true when you're a develope
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:53 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> Robert Cummings wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:28 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> >> well just for the hell of it; and because I'm feeling worn..
> >>
> >> anybody else find the following true when you're a developer?
> >>
> >> - frequent
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:46 +, Luke Slater wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Robert Cummings wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:28 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> >> well just for the hell of it; and because I'm feeling worn..
> >>
> >> anybody else find the following true when you're a developer
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:28 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
well just for the hell of it; and because I'm feeling worn..
anybody else find the following true when you're a developer?
- frequent bursts of side-tracking onto more interesting subjects
- vast amount of inhuman f
2009/1/19 Ashley Sheridan
> On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:28 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> > well just for the hell of it; and because I'm feeling worn..
> >
> > anybody else find the following true when you're a developer?
> >
> > - frequent bursts of side-tracking onto more interesting subjects
> ye
I'm not alone then (didn't think so :p)
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:28 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
well just for the hell of it; and because I'm feeling worn..
anybody else find the following true when you're a developer?
- frequent bursts of side-tracking onto more intere
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:28 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
well just for the hell of it; and because I'm feeling worn..
anybody else find the following true when you're a developer?
- frequent bursts of side-tracking onto more interesting subjects
- v
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Afan Pasalic wrote:
>
> Nathan Rixham wrote:
>
>> well just for the hell of it; and because I'm feeling worn..
>>
>> anybody else find the following true when you're a developer?
>>
>> - frequent bursts of side-tracking onto more interesting subjects
>> - vast amo
Nathan Rixham wrote:
well just for the hell of it; and because I'm feeling worn..
anybody else find the following true when you're a developer?
- frequent bursts of side-tracking onto more interesting subjects
- vast amount of inhuman focus, followed by inability to remain focussed
- general t
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Kyle Terry wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Nathan Rixham wrote:
well just for the hell of it; and because I'm feeling worn..
anybody else find the following true when you're a developer?
- frequent bursts of side-tracking onto more interesting subjects
- vast
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:28 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> well just for the hell of it; and because I'm feeling worn..
>
> anybody else find the following true when you're a developer?
>
> - frequent bursts of side-tracking onto more interesting subjects
yes, but it tends to be side-tracking to w
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:28 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> well just for the hell of it; and because I'm feeling worn..
>
> anybody else find the following true when you're a developer?
>
> - frequent bursts of side-tracking onto more interesting subjects
> - vast amount of inhuman focus, followed
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> well just for the hell of it; and because I'm feeling worn..
>
> anybody else find the following true when you're a developer?
>
> - frequent bursts of side-tracking onto more interesting subjects
> - vast amount of inhuman focus, followed b
well just for the hell of it; and because I'm feeling worn..
anybody else find the following true when you're a developer?
- frequent bursts of side-tracking onto more interesting subjects
- vast amount of inhuman focus, followed by inability to remain focussed
- general tendancy to keep taking
35 matches
Mail list logo