Nathan Nobbe wrote:
On 10/18/07, Nathan Nobbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/18/07, Joshua Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
thats the solution for the wrong problem. it's not up to me to change
the API. the API is designed like i noted and i need a way to get around
this behaviour.
thanks f
> [snip]
> to be honest i meanwhile have a workaround.
> [/snip]
>
> How about extending the API class and putting the function within the
> extended class that you need?
it's only partially a solution since the API will change. therefore the
expressions in the if statement maybe will change.
[snip]
to be honest i meanwhile have a workaround.
[/snip]
How about extending the API class and putting the function within the
extended class that you need?
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> >>>I can't touch the API.
> >>>
> >>>i have never use static variables inside of functions and likely
> >>>never will.
> >>>go for static class variables instead :)
> >>>
> >>> >>>class foo{
> >>>public static $foobar = false;
> >>>public function bar(){
> >>>
Stut wrote:
Joshua Bacher wrote:
I can't touch the API.
i have never use static variables inside of functions and likely
never will.
go for static class variables instead :)
bar();
$f->bar();
foo::$foobar=false;
$f->bar();
?>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/working/www/siuConference $ php testScrip
On 10/18/07, Nathan Nobbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 10/18/07, Joshua Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > thats the solution for the wrong problem. it's not up to me to change
> > the API. the API is designed like i noted and i need a way to get around
> > this behaviour.
> >
> > thank
On 10/18/07, Stut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Joshua Bacher wrote:
> >> I can't touch the API.
> >>
> >> i have never use static variables inside of functions and likely never
> will.
> >> go for static class variables instead :)
> >>
> >> >> class foo{
> >> public static $foobar =
On 10/18/07, Joshua Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> thats the solution for the wrong problem. it's not up to me to change
> the API. the API is designed like i noted and i need a way to get around
> this behaviour.
>
> thanks for your idea any further suggestions?
>
> josh
>
unfortunately i
Joshua Bacher wrote:
I can't touch the API.
i have never use static variables inside of functions and likely never will.
go for static class variables instead :)
bar();
$f->bar();
foo::$foobar=false;
$f->bar();
?>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/working/www/siuConference $ php testScript.php
FUBeyondA
> I can't touch the API.
>
> i have never use static variables inside of functions and likely never will.
> go for static class variables instead :)
>
> class foo{
> public static $foobar = false;
> public function bar(){
> static $foobar=false;
>
On 10/18/07, Joshua Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> i faced the following problem.
>
> i am using a API. This API has a class that looks like following:
>
> class foo{
> public function bar(){
> static $foobar=false;
> if ($foobar === False
Hi all,
i faced the following problem.
i am using a API. This API has a class that looks like following:
class foo{
public function bar(){
static $foobar=false;
if ($foobar === False){
$foobar='FUBeyondAllR';
12 matches
Mail list logo
