Re: [PHP] Somewhat OT - Stored Procedures

2011-03-09 Thread Nathan Nobbe
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 3:18 AM, Richard Quadling wrote: > On 7 March 2011 23:37, Nathan Nobbe wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Richard Quadling > > wrote: > >> > >> On 3 March 2011 18:30, Nathan Nobbe wrote: > >> > Hey gang, > >> > > >> > (Yes Tedd, I like your style, when it pertains

Re: [PHP] Somewhat OT - Stored Procedures

2011-03-09 Thread Richard Quadling
On 7 March 2011 23:37, Nathan Nobbe wrote: > On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Richard Quadling > wrote: >> >> On 3 March 2011 18:30, Nathan Nobbe wrote: >> > Hey gang, >> > >> > (Yes Tedd, I like your style, when it pertains to how you address the >> > list >> > :)) >> > >> > I have a new curiosi

Re: [PHP] Somewhat OT - Stored Procedures

2011-03-07 Thread Nathan Nobbe
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Richard Quadling wrote: > On 3 March 2011 18:30, Nathan Nobbe wrote: > > Hey gang, > > > > (Yes Tedd, I like your style, when it pertains to how you address the > list > > :)) > > > > I have a new curiosity that's arisen as a result of a new contract I'm > > workin

Re: [PHP] Somewhat OT - Stored Procedures

2011-03-04 Thread Nathan Rixham
Richard Quadling wrote: At a fundamental level, my PHP code isn't concerning itself with any physical data structures. As much as possible my PHP code treats the sql data source as a processor ready to supply data in a standardized form (even hierarchical) and to accept data for storage (again hi

Re: [PHP] Somewhat OT - Stored Procedures

2011-03-04 Thread Richard Quadling
On 3 March 2011 18:30, Nathan Nobbe wrote: > Hey gang, > > (Yes Tedd, I like your style, when it pertains to how you address the list > :)) > > I have a new curiosity that's arisen as a result of a new contract I'm > working on, I'd like to bounce around some thoughts off the list and see > what y

Re: [PHP] Somewhat OT - Stored Procedures

2011-03-03 Thread Nathan Nobbe
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Paul M Foster wrote: > On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 11:30:49AM -0700, Nathan Nobbe wrote: > > > Hey gang, > > > > (Yes Tedd, I like your style, when it pertains to how you address the > list > > :)) > > > > I have a new curiosity that's arisen as a result of a new contr

Re: [PHP] Somewhat OT - Stored Procedures

2011-03-03 Thread Nathan Nobbe
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Steve Staples wrote: > On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 11:30 -0700, Nathan Nobbe wrote: > > Hey gang, > > > > (Yes Tedd, I like your style, when it pertains to how you address the > list > > :)) > > > > I have a new curiosity that's arisen as a result of a new contract I'm

Re: [PHP] Somewhat OT - Stored Procedures

2011-03-03 Thread Paul M Foster
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 11:30:49AM -0700, Nathan Nobbe wrote: > Hey gang, > > (Yes Tedd, I like your style, when it pertains to how you address the list > :)) > > I have a new curiosity that's arisen as a result of a new contract I'm > working on, I'd like to bounce around some thoughts off the

Re: [PHP] Somewhat OT - Stored Procedures

2011-03-03 Thread Steve Staples
On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 11:30 -0700, Nathan Nobbe wrote: > Hey gang, > > (Yes Tedd, I like your style, when it pertains to how you address the list > :)) > > I have a new curiosity that's arisen as a result of a new contract I'm > working on, I'd like to bounce around some thoughts off the list and

[PHP] Somewhat OT - Stored Procedures

2011-03-03 Thread Nathan Nobbe
Hey gang, (Yes Tedd, I like your style, when it pertains to how you address the list :)) I have a new curiosity that's arisen as a result of a new contract I'm working on, I'd like to bounce around some thoughts off the list and see what you folks think if interested. The topic at hand is stored