Justin Patrin wrote:
Jochem Maas wrote:
...
Smarty does force that at all; you have to make the distinction and
apply liberal self-restraint.
I meant 'does NOT force' - thinko!
...
PLEASE WORLD: GET BEHIND CSS, AND FREE CONTENT FROM STYLE ON THE CLIENT.
why because it allows the structrully ma
Jochem Maas wrote:
Chris de Vidal wrote:
Jochem Maas said:
1. 'Template Engine' - you can justifyably call PHP a template engine
Correct. Seems that Smarty is, for the most part, redundant (see my last
post called "PHP makes a great templating engine (Was: smarty)").
I was not intending to pr
Chris de Vidal wrote:
Jochem Maas said:
1. 'Template Engine' - you can justifyably call PHP a template engine
Correct. Seems that Smarty is, for the most part, redundant (see my last
post called "PHP makes a great templating engine (Was: smarty)").
I was not intending to pronounce Smarty redun
Jochem Maas said:
> 1. 'Template Engine' - you can justifyably call PHP a template engine
Correct. Seems that Smarty is, for the most part, redundant (see my last
post called "PHP makes a great templating engine (Was: smarty)").
> but I think calling Smarty a template engine confuses the issue -
I have been following this thread closely and thought I'd summarize a
few points:
1. 'Template Engine' - you can justifyably call PHP a template engine,
but I think calling Smarty a template engine confuses the issue - it
would be clearer call it something like 'Presentation Component' which
e
5 matches
Mail list logo
