On Sep 9, 2011, at 2:36 PM, Daniel Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 14:30, Robert Cummings wrote:
>>
>> Oblig: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sUntx0pe_qI
>
>I didn't know it was possible to fill almost four minutes with a
> single note, outside of a test pattern. That's got to be the w
On Sep 9, 2011, at 1:30 PM, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
> On 09/09/2011 12:04 PM, Joshua Stoutenburg wrote:
>> NOTE: There could be lag caused by network and server technologies.
>> Perhaps answers arrive during the time it takes a person to prepare an
>> answer. These are forgivable.
>
> This is the
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 13:04, Joshua Stoutenburg wrote:
> I'm new to this email list . . .
>
> But is it customary to answer a question after it's already been adequately
> answered?
[snip!]
> NOTE: There could be lag caused by network and server technologies.
> Perhaps answers arrive during the
I'm new to this email list . . .
But is it customary to answer a question after it's already been adequately
answered?
Not trying to step on any toes. I just think if I were asking the question,
it would be unpleasant to continue receiving answers, especially the same
answer, after receiving one
4 matches
Mail list logo
